Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Local news takes flight in South Dakota’s largest city
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 14, 2013, 2:15 p.m.

Last week, we wrote about winners of the latest round of grantees of the Knight Prototype Fund. One of them was Open Gender Tracking, a team that’s working to figure out the best way to automatically analyze gender bias in news outlets, both in terms of who is writing the news, and who the news is being written about. This week, Source gets into the details of how they built the GenderTracker and how it works.

Under the hood, OGT is a ruby application (we use JRuby), which schedules batch jobs to process data from news APIs and static files. Jobs are queued using Redis. Text processing is done with Apache OpenNLP, but it really could be anything. Jobs don’t even have to be written in Ruby.

Outputs can be incredibly diverse. For our Global Voices study, we imported Open Gender Tracker into the R statistical software. The Boston Globe project is more interactive, storing results in MongoDB and serving them out to a Backbone.js app that visualizes the results.

Our new Global Name Data repository is another exciting part of this project. We have collected names from the US, UK, and Ireland and are hoping to add Chinese names from my colleague Huan Sun’s research on gender on Sina Weibo. We’re actively looking for name gender datasets from other cultures and would love to add more to this growing list.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Local news takes flight in South Dakota’s largest city
Pigeon 605 is delivering personalized local news to residents in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Are readers’ biases to blame for gender disparities in sports reporting? This study says no
The study looked at sports articles in a German newspaper and found that the byline’s gender didn’t have a significant effect on readers’ perception of the writer’s expertise.
Do countries with better-funded public media also have healthier democracies? Of course they do
But the direction of causality is tricky. Do a democracy’s flaws lead it to starve public media, or does starving public media lead to a democracy’s flaws?