Nieman Foundation at Harvard
Prism aims to make wellness stories more accessible, less cringe
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 1, 2013, 2:33 p.m.
LINK:  ➚   |   Posted by: Caroline O'Donovan   |   March 1, 2013

Citing an historic shift in business model and otherwise impending doom, Reuters’ Jack Shafer has some provocative advice for The New York Times:

Even given all that, the Times Co. crisis isn’t immediate — thanks to the asset-sell-off — merely pending. It has only two alternatives I can imagine, neither of them savory for the Ochs-Sulzberger family, which has owned the controlling shares in the company since 1896. It can continue to divest, downsize, and retrench its way to profitability or it can pass the newspaper on to a billionaire who possesses the desire to sustain it, a goal even Times haters must support on some level. The obvious billionaire, who has expressed such an interest in the past, is Michael Bloomberg, the brilliant entrepreneur behind Bloomberg LP., the mayor of New York City, and the self-appointed Caesar of America. Bloomberg could swallow the Times for breakfast and not be hungry for another acquisition until lunch.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Prism aims to make wellness stories more accessible, less cringe
“It’s not pictures of beautiful women doing handstands on surfboards.”
Votebeat will cover local election administration as a permanent newsroom
“How do you produce journalism that strengthens elections? That’s the question that runs through my mind every day.”
Hype is a weaponized form of optimism
Want to know the true value of AI, NFTs, and other much-touted technologies? Ignore the news and look at the harsh judgment of the market.