Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
The Conversation is trying to make its academia-fueled model work for local news
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 1, 2013, 2:33 p.m.
LINK: blogs.reuters.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Caroline O'Donovan   |   March 1, 2013

Citing an historic shift in business model and otherwise impending doom, Reuters’ Jack Shafer has some provocative advice for The New York Times:

Even given all that, the Times Co. crisis isn’t immediate — thanks to the asset-sell-off — merely pending. It has only two alternatives I can imagine, neither of them savory for the Ochs-Sulzberger family, which has owned the controlling shares in the company since 1896. It can continue to divest, downsize, and retrench its way to profitability or it can pass the newspaper on to a billionaire who possesses the desire to sustain it, a goal even Times haters must support on some level. The obvious billionaire, who has expressed such an interest in the past, is Michael Bloomberg, the brilliant entrepreneur behind Bloomberg LP., the mayor of New York City, and the self-appointed Caesar of America. Bloomberg could swallow the Times for breakfast and not be hungry for another acquisition until lunch.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The Conversation is trying to make its academia-fueled model work for local news
“I get the challenges small startups face trying to fill this void of local news. So this is our little attempt to support them in our Conversation way.”
Is statehouse reporting set for a revival?
For decades, the narrative about state government reporting has been almost entirely negative — but our new research suggests a turnaround.
Beehiiv is the latest platform to try to lure independent journalists with perks
These types of programs are likely to continue to come and go, as the needs of journalists and the platforms’ businesses evolve.