Nieman Foundation at Harvard
With new widgets, The Philadelphia Inquirer wants to be readers’ favorite “second-screen experience”
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 1, 2013, 2:33 p.m.
LINK:  ➚   |   Posted by: Caroline O'Donovan   |   March 1, 2013

Citing an historic shift in business model and otherwise impending doom, Reuters’ Jack Shafer has some provocative advice for The New York Times:

Even given all that, the Times Co. crisis isn’t immediate — thanks to the asset-sell-off — merely pending. It has only two alternatives I can imagine, neither of them savory for the Ochs-Sulzberger family, which has owned the controlling shares in the company since 1896. It can continue to divest, downsize, and retrench its way to profitability or it can pass the newspaper on to a billionaire who possesses the desire to sustain it, a goal even Times haters must support on some level. The obvious billionaire, who has expressed such an interest in the past, is Michael Bloomberg, the brilliant entrepreneur behind Bloomberg LP., the mayor of New York City, and the self-appointed Caesar of America. Bloomberg could swallow the Times for breakfast and not be hungry for another acquisition until lunch.

Show tags
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
With new widgets, The Philadelphia Inquirer wants to be readers’ favorite “second-screen experience”
The news org is catering to the readers who spend a lot of time on their phones during live events like sports games and election returns.
How ProPublica reached workers while reporting on dairy farm conditions
“We plan to do more than simply expect that readers will find the story and find us. We plan to take the story to them.”
Last Night at School Committee distills hours-long public meetings into half-hour podcast episodes
“We have created this podcast as an easy way for any parent, citizen, or interested party to get the highlights, and our take, on what happened last night at School Committee.”