Nieman Foundation at Harvard
What’s with the rise of “fact-based journalism”?
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 19, 2013, 2:39 p.m.
LINK:  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   July 19, 2013

Laura Hazard Owen notes that Slate isn’t sending an article’s headline to tweets generated by its tweet button. Instead, it’s setting a different, more social friendly string — “This Is a Terrible Way to Commemorate a Major Civil Rights Victory” becomes “The New Yorker’s Bert and Ernie Cover Is a Terrible Way to Commemorate a Major Civil Rights Victory,” for instance.

As she points out, nothing new — it’s as simple as changing the language in your tweet button template — but worthwhile anyway. (In WordPress, you’d be replacing a call to get_the_title() with whatever custom field you set up on your backend.) And as Slate’s Katherine Goldstein says:

One of our bloggers said that he used to spend time doing custom headlines for Twitter and then he started making those custom headlines his regular headlines. Those are the kinds of conversations and thought processes we’re really encouraging our editors to have.

Show tags
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
What’s with the rise of “fact-based journalism”?
“To describe one form of journalism as ‘fact-based’ is to tacitly acknowledge that there is also such a thing as ‘non-fact-based journalism.’ And there isn’t.”
Britney Spears and the generational shift in celebrity coverage
“There was just this nastiness that emerged in the way celebrities were covered in the 2000s.”
How to b-e-e of use: Signal Cleveland hosts second annual community spelling contest
“Listening is great, and talking to community members is great, but we also have to figure out how to be of use.”