Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
The California Journalism Preservation Act would do more harm than good. Here’s how the state might better help news
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 10, 2015, 10:43 a.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK: www.theguardian.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   July 10, 2015

If you’d like to read the first chapter of Harper Lee’s controversially long-lost novel, Go Set a Watchman, you have a few choices this morning: You could head over to The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal, or The Sydney Morning Herald and other Fairfax-owned Australian newspapers.

The book will be published July 14; in the meantime, the sites are left trying to attract the most visitors to the same content.

Go Set a Watchman will be published by the News Corp-owned HarperCollins in the U.S., which is why the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal has the excerpt here. In the U.K. and other English-language territories, the book will be published by Penguin Random House UK. Different publication territories means publishers can sell different first serial rights to the same content.

Each site also has the same audio: the chapter read by Reese Witherspoon. From there, it’s up to them to add the trimmings. The Guardian does it best: The chapter begins on a train, and you can listen to ambient sound of the train running over the tracks as you read and see gentle animations of the landscape passing by outside the train window.

The Wall Street Journal illustrates the excerpt with black-and-white photos and links to a whole lot of previous coverage. The Sydney Morning Herald has a quiz about how well you know To Kill a Mockingbird, since a quiz about how well you know the first chapter of Go Set a Watchman might be a little much.

Both The Guardian and The Sydney Morning Herald also have reviews of the first chapter — as does The Telegraph, whose reviewer must have read the chapter on one of the other sites, though they don’t say which one.

And then, of course, there are so, so many places to discuss the chapter: Facebook groups, Twitter groups, on-site comments, and an actual live blog at The Guardian, including people’s negative Twitter reactions to said live blog.

HarperCollins has printed more than two million copies of the book in the U.S. — full-length books, meaning that the sites running the first chapter don’t have that long to hold readers’ attention before there’s a much better option. No wonder they’re trying to milk it while they can, though it’s not clear how much readers care when they know they are going to be able to read the entire book in four days. The title was the #1 book on Amazon — among all books, not just among pre-orders — on Friday morning.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The California Journalism Preservation Act would do more harm than good. Here’s how the state might better help news
“If there are resources to be put to work, we must ask where those resources should come from, who should receive them, and on what basis they should be distributed.”
“Fake news” legislation risks doing more harm than good amid a record number of elections in 2024
“Whether intentional or not, the legislation we examined created potential opportunities to diminish opposing voices and decrease media freedom — both of which are particularly important in countries holding elections.”
Dateline Totality: How local news outlets in the eclipse’s path are covering the covering
“Celestial events tend to draw highly engaged audiences, and this one is no exception.”