Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Newsonomics: In Memphis’ unexpected news war, The Daily Memphian’s model demands attention
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Sept. 4, 2015, 1:35 p.m.
Audience & Social
LINK: www.accessnow.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Joseph Lichterman   |   September 4, 2015

A collection of advocacy groups from around the world on Friday released an open letter to Twitter, calling on the company to restore API access to Politwoops, a site that archived politicians’ deleted tweets.

In May, Twitter pulled the American version of Politwoops’ API access, and followed suit with the international editions last month. In a statement to my colleague Laura Hazard Owen, a Twitter spokesman rationalized the decision by saying, “The ability to delete one’s Tweets — for whatever reason — has been a long-standing feature of Twitter for all users.”

In the letter, the groups argued that public figures should be held to a higher standard because their constituencies have a direct interest in what they post online:

Twitter’s reasoning conflates transparency and accountability with privacy. We agree that when users decide to delete tweets they are engaging in expression — but add that the public has a compelling interest in the expression of public officials. Recognizing this public interest, courts have long held that public officials do not receive the same treatment for privacy. Further, when public officials use Twitter to amplify their political views, they invite greater scrutiny of their expression. Journalists and civil society utilize tools like Politwoops to understand the views and commitments of the people these politicians represent—and the politician or candidate’s own intents and perspective. In this case, the citizen’s right to freedom of expression — which includes access to information — outweighs the official’s right to a retroactive edit.

The groups signing the letter include Politwoops’ original developer, the Open State Foundation; Human Rights Watch; the Sunlight Foundation; Free Press; the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and others.

In the letter, the groups recommended that Twitter restore Politwoops’ API access while also developing API policies that allow groups to “effectively promote accountability and transparency for the public interest.” The letter also invites Twitter to participate in meetings with various constituencies to work on these policies.

“The right to information, free speech, and privacy protect people and enable them to hold the powerful to account,” Open State Foundation executive director Arjan El Fassed said in a statement. “By blocking Politwoops, Twitter has decided to forsake these values, and the only people who will benefit are the powerful.”

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Newsonomics: In Memphis’ unexpected news war, The Daily Memphian’s model demands attention
It’s generated controversy over its fundraising, its paywall, and its staffing. But it’s also about as close as a major American city has gotten to a digital news site that can go toe-to-toe with the local daily newspaper.
The New Yorker’s new weekly newsletter on climate change will try to break through the daily noise
“Climate is one of those big, overarching topics that feels essential to understand and also very overwhelming. The newsletter form seems like the right way to approach it because it narrows the focus.”
Spotify is gaining a podcast audience quickly. But is it an audience that isn’t as interested in news?
Data from Germany finds that Apple Podcasts users devote about 23 percent of their podcast listening to news shows — versus just 8 percent for Spotify users.