Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
The Marshall Project, an early model for single-subject nonprofit news sites, turns five today (and got a shoutout on Jeopardy last night)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 18, 2015, 11:35 a.m.
LINK: www.pewglobal.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   November 18, 2015

A new Pew report finds that beliefs in the freedom of the press vary substantially by country, with support for both free speech and a free press “contingent on the topic.” In general, while “large majorities across the globe” believe that the people should be able to criticize the government publicly, there’s less consensus on “things that are offensive either to minorities or religious groups…that is sexually explicit or that calls for violent protests.”

People are also divided on whether the press should “freely publish on sensitive issues related to national security,” according to the report. And there are differences in how younger and older people look at these issues.

The report’s authors surveyed people in 38 countries. Among the findings:

— There’s widespread support for a free press, but “roughly half or more in 27 of the 38 countries surveyed say the government should be able to prevent the media from publishing information about sensitive issues related to national security.” There are demographic divides on this issue:

Screen Shot 2015-11-18 at 11.01.36 AMIn 16 of the 38 countries surveyed, people ages 18 to 29 are more likely than those ages 50 and older to say that people should be able to make sexually explicit statements in public. And young people in Europe, Canada, the U.S., Australia, South Korea, Russia and Senegal are more supportive than their elders of the press being able to publish sensitive information about national security issues.

— Americans and Canadians are more tolerant of “being able to say things in public that are offensive to minorities,” but in many other countries, “majorities say the government should be able to prevent speech that is offensive to minority groups.” Members of minority groups are less likely to support this, however:

For example, in the U.S., non-whites (57%), including Hispanics, are much less likely to agree that people should be able to say these types of statements in public than are whites (72%). Similarly, Arabs in Israel (15%) are less supportive of this form of speech than Jews (39%).

You can look at a sortable table here, and read the full report here.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The Marshall Project, an early model for single-subject nonprofit news sites, turns five today (and got a shoutout on Jeopardy last night)
“As a former journalist, I was mindful of the power of honest storytelling. As an idealist, I felt that if only Americans knew the truth, changes would soon follow.”
News portals like Yahoo still bring Democrats and Republicans together for political news, but they’re fading fast
Plus: Hello “lifestyle misinformation,” hundreds of dead newspapers “revived” online to support Indian interests, and all of the fact-checking discussion you could possibly want.
Doing more with less: Seven practical tips for local newsrooms to strrrrretch their resources
Content doesn’t need to be perfect to be valuable; share resources within a city, not just a company; and other ideas.