• Fellowships
  • Reports
  • Lab
  • Storyboard
    • Nieman Foundation at Harvard
    HOME
    About
    Subscribe
    Archives
              
    Foundation
    Reports
    Storyboard
    LATEST STORY
    The former host of S-Town has a new subject to investigate: Journalism
    Business Models Mobile & Apps Audience & Social Aggregation & Discovery Reporting & Production
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    March 14, 2016, 12:12 p.m.
    Reporting & Production
    Who is posting comments on news stories, and why do they do it?
    LINK: engagingnewsproject.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Shan Wang   |   March 14, 2016

    RELATED ARTICLE
    What happened after 7 news sites got rid of reader comments
    September 16, 2015
    Who’s actually adding to the civil discourse/garbage fire that is the comments section of news sites (the sites that still keep open a place for such reader contributions, at least)?

    Fifty-five percent of Americans have posted an online comment and 78 percent have read comments, according to a report released Monday at SXSW by the Engaging News Project out of the University of Texas at Austin. The report also suggests, however, that over half of Americans have never read news-related comments or commented anywhere (dedicated apps, social media, the news sites themselves) about the news. Fourteen percent have left any sort of comments on news stories:

    engaging-news-report-news-sites

    Of those leaving news comments, the majority posted via social media (77.9 percent), and most (53 percent) posted on a monthly basis or even less frequently.

    The report pulls out a few other findings about the demographics of news commenters:

    — Compared to those who read news comments but did not themselves comment, those commenting on the news “tend[ed] to be more male, have lower levels of education, and have lower incomes.”

    — Compared to those who posted comments on the news infrequently, those who posted comments on the news on a weekly basis (or even more frequently) were similarly “more male, have lower levels of education, and have lower incomes. They [were] are less white and more Hispanic.”

    RELATED ARTICLE
    New Pew survey: Not all Twitter users tweet news, but those who do tweet a lot of it
    August 19, 2015
    Respondents were asked why they left comments. Responses ran the gamut, but the top reason was “to express an emotion or an opinion,” followed by “adding information,” “correcting inaccuracies or misinformation,” and “taking part in the debate.” These responses varied based on the topic people commented on most frequently:

    — Those who commented most on U.S. politics did so to express an emotion or opinion, to take part in the debate, to educate others, and to balance the discussion, compared to those who commented most on stories about their neighborhood or community.

    — Those who commented most frequently on news about their neighborhood or community were more likely to comment to share an experience, be part of the community, or show sympathy to others, compared to those who commented most on U.S. politics.

    RELATED ARTICLE
    After deciding to charge for comments, Tablet’s conversation moves…to Facebook
    June 3, 2015
    Not surprisingly, the report also found that those who avoided commenting on the news or avoided reading comments on the news felt that comment sections were uncivil and argumentative. But when it came to policing comment sections, the report found an even split between people who believed news organizations should remove offensive comments (42 percent) and those who believed comments constitute free speech (41.6 percent).

    The responses to the survey were collected between November and December 2015 by market research group GfK from a “representative sample” of Americans, with complete data from 1,471 respondents. The report breaks out a number of other tidbits around online news commenting, including whether commenters would like journalists/experts to weigh in on facts (yes) and whether they’d be willing to pay for comments (no). The full report is available here.

    Show tags
     
    What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
    Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
    Prefer a once-a-week email? »
    The latest from Nieman Lab
    The former host of S-Town has a new subject to investigate: Journalism
    Neel Dhanesha
    What’s the journalism we can make for people who don’t trust journalism?
    Neel Dhanesha
    Journalism scholars want to make journalism better. They’re not quite sure how.
    Jacob L. Nelson
    Congress fights to keep AM radio in cars
    Matthew Jordan
    Going back to the well: CNN.com, the most popular news site in the U.S., is putting up a paywall
    Joshua Benton
    Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    The former host of S-Town has a new subject to investigate: Journalism
    After more than a decade in the industry, Brian Reed is Question(ing) Everything about it.
    What’s the journalism we can make for people who don’t trust journalism?
    “You just need somebody with enough charisma that they would carry people over the line. And it wouldn’t be a traditional journalist.”
    Journalism scholars want to make journalism better. They’re not quite sure how.
    Does any of this work actually matter?
    Help advance the Nieman Foundation’s mission “to promote and elevate the standards of journalism” by making a donation.

    To promote and elevate the standards of journalism

    Covering thought leadership in journalism

    Pushing to the future of journalism

    Exploring the art and craft of story
    © 2024 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College  /  Some rights reserved
    Harvard Trademark Privacy Digital Accessibility
    Walter Lippmann House    One Francis Ave.    Cambridge, MA 02138    617 495 2237