Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
In a corner of Brazil, local reporters are switching to government jobs and the state is achieving “media capture”
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 19, 2016, 11:23 a.m.
Audience & Social
LINK: www.recode.net  ➚   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   October 19, 2016

Snapchat is planning to switch up the payment terms of its Discover section, Recode reports — but that might not be a bad thing if it provides publishers with a little more certainty about their revenue from the platform.

From Recode:

Instead of sharing ad revenue that section produces, Snapchat wants to pay content partners a flat license fee up front and keep the ad money for itself. It’s the same model that TV networks use when they buy programming.

That’s a switch from the terms Snapchat has offered since it launched Discover in 2015. Up until now, it has let publishers sell ads against their own content, and Snapchat has also sold ads against the same content using its own sales team. Splits have varied depending on the deal and who sold the ads.

Snapchat Discover is only open to around 20 publishers, including BuzzFeed, Cosmopolitan, The Wall Street Journal, Food Network, and the NFL. While numbers have ebbed and flowed, publishers have generally raved about the amount of traffic they get from Snapchat: In September 2015, for instance, Snapchat was BuzzFeed’s third biggest traffic source, and the company said in June that its Discover video views were up 33 percent this year. Vox has a deal with Snapchat to feature content from all eight of its publishing brands on its Discover channel, and created a “Snapchat Studio” this year.

Snapchat has already tweaked its Discover payment model: The Information reported in May that Snapchat was already requiring some publishers with Discover channels “to pay Snapchat a guaranteed minimum amount of money over a specific time period.” Then, earlier this month, Snapchat updated its app to make publisher content much less prominent. It’s unclear whether the publisher payments reported by The Information would go away with a new flat licensing fee, and different publishers might be able to negotiate different deals. But if Snapchat is already making Discover content less visible on its platform, then a flat license fee could conceivably be a steadier source of income than ad revenue.

Still, the move raises the same old concerns about giving platforms too much control over publishers’ content; this isn’t a fight that’s going away any time soon.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
In a corner of Brazil, local reporters are switching to government jobs and the state is achieving “media capture”
A strategy of “capturing the main professionals from the newspapers, in their respective fields of work, and thus reduce the tensions of being disturbed by the journalists every single day.” “Memory is crucial for journalism, and we are losing it.”
Focus here, not there: These are the gaps in political misinformation research
“Persistent debates about what constitutes ‘fake news’ and distinctions between other types of false information are mostly distracting.” Plus: A guide to covering misinformation without burning your news org or your readers, and a discussion of filter bubbles as not-really-a-thing.
How are paywalled news outlets preparing to serve residents in California’s mega-power shutoffs?
“If we’re going to have news that is paid for by audiences, we have to talk about the news that should never be behind paywalls.”