Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Who needs deepfakes? Simple out-of-context photos can be a powerfully low-tech form of misinformation
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 21, 2016, noon
Business Models
LINK: www.ft.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   October 21, 2016

Hope isn’t lost for media organizations trying to get readers to stop blocking their ads. Maybe all they have to do is ask.

In July, The Financial Times ran a 30-day experiment to see what it would take to get people to whitelist the site in their adblocking software. Fifteen thousand of its registered users were split into three groups, each of which had access restricted in different ways. One group, for example, was presented with FT stories that had some of their words removed, a metaphor for the share of revenue that comes from advertising. Other readers weren’t able to access the site at all unless they opted in to ads. Readers were also given a message: “We understand your decision to use an ad blocker. However, FT journalism takes time and funding…”

The Financial Times says readers responded well to the experiment. Forty-seven percent of those who had to read stories with missing words agreed to whitelist the site, while 69 percent of users barred from the site entirely agreed to let ads through. And 40 percent of those whose access wasn’t restricted at all opted out of blocking ads.

The experiment shows that, in many case, the most effective anti-adblocking technique is also the most simple: talking directly to readers. The relationship between media organizations and readers online operates via an implicit contract: Publishers offer readers content for free, and in exchange, readers see those publishers’ ads. Making that implicit contract more explicit reminds readers of that dynamic and encourages them to support the sites they read.

Other publishers have tried variations on the idea, erring on the site of politeness and perhaps even repentance. In a recent campaign, Wired acknowledged why its users want to run adblockers (“We get it: ads aren’t what you’re here for) but reminds readers that “ads help us keep the lights on.”

Beyond asking people to whitelist, Slate (“We noticed you’re using an ad blocker”) and The New York Times (“The best things in life aren’t free. You currently have an ad blocker installed”) have used the messages to encourage people to sign up for their paid products. The Atlantic has also recently applied this idea.

The success of the efforts “show that FT readers accept advertising as part of the reader/publisher value exchange,” argued Dominic Good, The Financial Times’ global advertising sales and strategy director, in a press release announcing the results of the newspaper’s experiment.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Who needs deepfakes? Simple out-of-context photos can be a powerfully low-tech form of misinformation
A bogus headline seems both more true and more familiar to people when it’s accompanied by a photo of any kind.
Newsonomics: In Memphis’ unexpected news war, The Daily Memphian’s model demands attention
It’s generated controversy over its fundraising, its paywall, and its staffing. But it’s also about as close as a major American city has gotten to a digital news site that can go toe-to-toe with the local daily newspaper.
The New Yorker’s new weekly newsletter on climate change will try to break through the daily noise
“Climate is one of those big, overarching topics that feels essential to understand and also very overwhelming. The newsletter form seems like the right way to approach it because it narrows the focus.”