Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
May 22, 2017, 1:31 p.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK: gannett-my.sharepoint.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   May 22, 2017

When it comes to metrics and measurement, digital publishing has brought both the good and the bad. While news organizations are now able to see, with increasingly accuracy and depth, exactly which stories resonate with readers, metrics have also taken an outsize role in determining which stories reporters are encouraged to chase. That’s often bad news for important investigative stories that are unlikely to draw big audiences.

The effect, however, might be less significant than many assume, according to a small study. Paul D’Ambrosio, director of news and investigations at New Jersey’s Asbury Park Press, recently polled almost 100 reporters (many of them active in IRE and NICAR) to study the relationship between metrics pressures and watchdog journalism across newsrooms. The results? Metrics matter, but less than you might think. Nearly 54 percent of reporters agree or strongly agreed with the notion that watchdog stories do well, metrics-wise. Only about 15 percent disagreed or strongly disagreed (with the remainder neither agreeing or disagreeing).

Most reporters (76 percent) also disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement “I always seek stories that will boost my web metrics”; 53 percent disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement “I only feel my manager is only concerned about me growing my web metrics” (versus 23 percent who agreed or strongly agreed).

Other questions, which D’Ambrosio’s compiled into a variable to measure reporters’ overall concern about metrics, included “I rely on web-based audience feedback to help me make editorial decisions in my stories,” “I avoid stories that I feel will not perform well on the web, even though I think they may be important for the public to know about,” and “I have seen my story web metrics grow over the last 12 months.”

Of course, it’s a small survey, and a group of reporters drawn heavily from IRE and NICAR is likely to be unrepresentative in ways that skew in the direction of investigative reporting. But the takeaway, said D’Ambrosio, is straightforward: “Reporters may feel empowered to pursue watchdog stories, perhaps out of a sense of duty and because the idea of being a journalist attracts community-minded people to the business,” he wrote in the report.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
“It has never been my expectation that every piece the New York Times publishes will confirm my personal worldview, but it was also never my expectation The Times would run an op-ed calling for state violence.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer’s journalists of color are taking a “sick and tired day” after “Buildings Matter, Too” headline
“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.”
VizPol takes a cue from bird-watching apps to help journalists identify unfamiliar political symbols
Built by researchers at Columbia University’s journalism and engineering schools and launched as an invite-only beta this week, VizPol can currently recognize 52 symbols.