Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Would you pay to be able to quit TikTok and Instagram? You’d be surprised how many would
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
May 29, 2018, 10:26 a.m.
LINK: blog.chartbeat.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Christine Schmidt   |   May 29, 2018

Traditionally — as much of a tradition as there can be in the online analytics world — people accessing sites via mobile has mostly meant people arriving from social media. But now, post-Facebook algorithm changes, the number of mobile readers visiting news sites directly has surpassed the number visiting from Facebook.

(Reminder: Starting in mid-October, Facebook began tweaking the News Feed algorithm away from Page content — a.k.a. many publishers — and toward “meaningful interactions.” Some publishers have experienced such a significant drop in traffic that it contributed to the shuttering of the site or layoffs. But many of those in those affected buckets relied on Facebook’s algorithm as the core of their business model. Not the sturdiest choice.)

New data from Chartbeat shows that, while Facebook traffic has been (unsurprisingly) declining since the October 2017 change, both Google Search and direct traffic have been steadily climbing. (Note: we should clarify that this is in regards to mobile readers “arriving to a site (website or app) directly to the homepage or section front” more frequently than social platforms like Facebook.)

This less-traffic-from-Facebook trend goes beyond mobile, though. Facebook’s referral traffic across all devices has dipped below direct traffic only on mobile.

Google Chrome recommendations on mobile have been growing significantly, as Chartbeat’s CEO explained earlier this spring. It’s now the fourth largest referrer in Chartbeat’s data, after only Google Search, Facebook, and Twitter, ballooning 2,100 percent in 2017.

Basically, mobile traffic to news sites doesn’t have to dry up because Facebook is shifting its users’ attention elsewhere. But now the stakes of taming multiple algorithmic beasts at once is even higher.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Would you pay to be able to quit TikTok and Instagram? You’d be surprised how many would
“The relationship he has uncovered is more like the co-dependence seen in a destructive relationship, or the way we relate to addictive products such as tobacco that we know are doing us harm.”
BREAKING: The ways people hear about big news these days; “into a million pieces,” says source
The New York Times and the Washington Post compete with meme accounts for the chance to be first with a big headline.
In 1924, a magazine ran a contest: “Who is to pay for broadcasting and how?” A century later, we’re still asking the same question
Radio Broadcast received close to a thousand entries to its contest — but ultimately rejected them all.