Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“Lightning in a bottle”: Meredith Clark on Black Twitter’s journalistic impact, legacy — and writing its “obituary”
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 1, 2022, 11:31 a.m.
Aggregation & Discovery
LINK: correctiv.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Laura Hazard Owen   |   March 1, 2022

The German investigative nonprofit Correctiv just launched a tracker to monitor worldwide sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine. It’s available in English and German and updated several times a day.

“This creates transparency around the most important tool the West has in the current crisis,” Justus von Daniels, editor-in-chief of Correctiv, told me.

Data for the Sanctions Tracker comes from the Open Sanctions database. Correctiv is filtering it for sanctions against Russian targets from 2014 to the present.

Users can view sanctions by country and date and track how many there are against Russian people, companies, and other individual targets.

The Technology and Social Change Project at Harvard’s Shorenstein Center is “tracking moves by major technology companies and governments to limit the flow of misinformation. This includes state sponsored misinformation and content removed at the behest of governments, as people worldwide flock to social media to receive updates of the rapidly unfolding violence.” That project, updated daily, is here.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“Lightning in a bottle”: Meredith Clark on Black Twitter’s journalistic impact, legacy — and writing its “obituary”
“No matter what the technology is, we’re going to be using it.”
Less is more, and discounts work: A new study looks at the minutiae of paywall strategy
“Reducing the information density of teaser elements on paywalled articles and offering discounts may help newspapers increase their online subscriber numbers.”
How DeepSeek stacks up when citing news publishers
The DeepSeek hype cycle is in full force, but can the chatbot attribute sources more accurately than its competitors?