Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“Some hard and important lessons”: One of the most promising local news nonprofits looks back — and ahead
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 3, 2013, 12:10 p.m.

It’s been three months since Andrew Sullivan left The Daily Beast and tested the loyalty of his readership with a $19.99 annual subscription fee. In an interview with Business Insider, Sullivan explains why he can’t quite stomach sponsored content and how he decided to make the leap into independence. At heart, he says he’s a journalist not altogether comfortable with functioning as a businessman:

I think things have shifted a little bit. One likes to think one is above all this and say “I’m a writer, I only produce what comes from the purist of my intentions and none of this affects me.” And, it doesn’t really affect me. I’m not going to change my views on a subject because it’s more popular. I’m not going to stop writing about circumcision even though readers roll their eyes when I do. I’m not going to stop shitting on New York, simply because it’s hilarious to do so. None of that will change.

But I found that there had previously been a subtle incentive to create pageviews…Our incentive now is to get the guy or the woman who read it today to subscribe and get the guy or woman who subscribed yesterday to re-subscribe in a year’s time. That’s what we need. We need to make he experience worth what they’re paying for it and worth renewing.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“Some hard and important lessons”: One of the most promising local news nonprofits looks back — and ahead
The National Trust for Local News is a nonprofit organization with a mission so important even its harshest critics want it to succeed.
Jeffrey Goldberg got the push notification of all push notifications — and a hell of a story
His inclusion on a high-level Signal chat about American war plans highlights how the Trump administration is operating — and how much of a threat it is to a free press.
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
At a time of increasing polarization and rigid ideologies, the L.A. Times has decided it wants to make its opinion pieces less persuasive to readers by increasing the cost of changing your mind.