Nieman Foundation at Harvard
Journalists are burned out. Some newsrooms are fighting back.
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 16, 2015, 2:49 p.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK:  ➚   |   Posted by: Shan Wang   |   November 16, 2015

Hot (financial) takes are coming to Bloomberg. Its newest editorial initiative, Gadfly, launched over the weekend as an extension of the existing Bloomberg View opinions section, with a sizable roster of editors and columnists drawn from other news organizations as well as from within Bloomberg.


“Our goal is to provide rapid, smart takeaways on the day’s most important news on markets, finance, companies, and technology,” Bloomberg editor-in-chief John Micklethwait wrote in a note introducing the new section on Sunday.

“We think of our audience as including both the sophisticated Bloomberg terminal user and the deeply curious general interest reader,” Gadfly executive editor Timothy O’Brien wrote in an email to the Lab. “We respect that both of those audiences have limited amounts of valuable time, and we want to be their first stop for understanding how to think about the most important business news of the moment.”

The sleek new site was designed with mobile audiences and social sharing in mind, with a focus on easily digestible charts to illustrate each piece of analysis. It looks a bit like Quartz’s homepage, with stories presented one after the other in an endless scroll.

Gadfly is the first major editorial project to debut under the former Economist editor-in-chief Micklethwait’s leadership, Politico notes. It was described back in July as being reminiscent of Lex from The Financial Times, Heard on the Street from The Wall Street Journal, and Breakingviews from Reuters (Gadfly’s current staff includes journalists whose previous credits include those very sites). As for what differentiates it from these potential financial commentary competitors, O’Brien highlighted the following:

— We see insightful analysis wedded to great writing and the unique, data-mining power of the Bloomberg Terminal as a differentiator in and of itself.

— We’ll cover a broader range of corporate, financial and market topics than many of our competitors, and we’ll cover those topics with dozens of columnists on the ground globally.

— We’re doubling down in regions like the Asia-Pacific when some of our competitors are pulling back. Great columnists aren’t commodities and we plan to continue stocking up on the best. Quality is a differentiator in a noisy, unfiltered news world.

— We’ll try to be closer to the news, and write more promptly off the news, than many of our competitors — though we’ll never sacrifice quality for speed. The “sweet spot” is finding a balance between speed and quality and then targeting the right subject matter. Those are Gadfly’s twin goals.

— We take mobile, social, platform development and design seriously and are using those as competitive advantages on the web.

Some weren’t quite sure what to make of Gadfly’s approach, or felt it was entering a crowded field.

Regardless, Gadfly writers have a major leg up — they can draw on the enormous benefit that is the Terminal (in case you forget, a little tag at the end of those Bloomberg stories reads “Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal.”) At the moment, all the site’s content is free (and ad-free), but Terminal subscribers get it 15 minutes early.

Show tags
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Journalists are burned out. Some newsrooms are fighting back.
Keeping reporters healthy over the long term often requires both systemic and behavioral changes, and getting buy-in often isn’t easy.
Disinformation often gets blamed for swaying elections, but the research isn’t so clear
“Our belief in free will is ultimately a reason so many of us back democracy in the first place. Denying it can arguably be more damaging than a few fake news posts lurking on social media.”
After LA Times layoffs, questions about diversity and seniority swirl
Disagreements between the LA Times and its Guild over seniority protections ended in more than 60 journalists of color being laid off.