Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Feb. 22, 2018, 1:07 p.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK: reporterslab.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Shan Wang   |   February 22, 2018

23 years ago, there was Snopes.com. Now there are at least 149 dedicated fact-checking projects around the world currently active, according to the latest census from the Duke Reporters’ Lab, released Thursday.

That’s up from 114 at the 2017 count, and up from 44 in the spring of 2014, when the Reporters’ Lab did a global tally for the first time.

21 fact-checking efforts have launched just this past year, including a brand new Indonesian fact-checking effort from Tempo.co launched last month, the Reporters’ Lab census found. Election cycles in countries such as Norway, Germany, and South Korea have spurred fact-checking projects that have honed in on candidates and their campaigns (Indonesia’s general elections are next year).

This global boom is no fad:

Based on the 143 projects whose launch dates we know for certain, 41 (29 percent) have been in business for more than five years. And a diverse group of six have already celebrated 10 years of nearly continuous operation — from 23-year-old Snopes.com, the grandparent of hoax-busting, to locally focused “Reality Checks” from WISC-TV (News 3) in Madison, Wisconsin, which started fact-checking political statements in 2004. Some long-term projects have occasionally shuttered between election cycles before resuming their work. And some overcame significant funding gaps to come back from the dead. On average, fact-checking organizations have been around four years.

Who’s actually behind each of these efforts varies. In the U.S., 41 of 47 projects counted were arms of established news outlets like WISC-TV in Wisconsin or the Associated Press (a partner in Facebook’s own fact-checking initiative). Outside the U.S., only about half of the fact-checkers are affiliated with an already established news organization (54 of 102).

There’s also more competition among fact-checking projects in many parts of the world:

Last year there were 11 countries with more than one active fact-checker. This year, we counted more than one fact-checker in 22 countries and more than two in 11 countries.

Countries With More Than Two Fact-Checkers:

United States: 47
Brazil: 8
France: 7
United Kingdom: 6
South Korea: 5
India: 4
Germany: 4
Ukraine: 4
Canada: 4
Italy: 3
Spain: 3

You can browse the (regularly updated) world map of all these projects compiled by the Reporters’ Lab here.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
“It has never been my expectation that every piece the New York Times publishes will confirm my personal worldview, but it was also never my expectation The Times would run an op-ed calling for state violence.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer’s journalists of color are taking a “sick and tired day” after “Buildings Matter, Too” headline
“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.”
VizPol takes a cue from bird-watching apps to help journalists identify unfamiliar political symbols
Built by researchers at Columbia University’s journalism and engineering schools and launched as an invite-only beta this week, VizPol can currently recognize 52 symbols.