Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
May 6, 2020, 1:35 p.m.
LINK: medianut.substack.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   May 6, 2020

Our old friend Josh Sternberg — he’s a good media/advertising reporter/editor, you should hire him! — is writing a newsletter called The Media Nut that’s worth a subscribe. Today he noted a new study that showed the extent to which obscure, inscrutable ad tech companies have been able to take advertisers’ money before it gets to the publisher.

Ad tech. Two little words that cause so much headache, heartache, and according to a report published today by the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers (ISBA) and the Association of Online Publishers (AOP) and PwC, bewilderment. (If not a little anger.)

Tracing the advertising spend supply chain — from 15 brands, eight agencies, five DSPs, six SSPs and 12 publishers — the report found:

  • “publishers receive 51% of advertiser spend on average; and
  • “taking other visible costs such as DSP/SSP fees and other technology costs, 15% of advertiser spend — an ‘unknown delta,’ representing around one-third of supply chain costs — could not be attributed.”
  • The industry, both the buy- and sell-side, has long known of the existence of the ad-tech black hole. Now, with this report, and with this fancy visual, we can put some kind of number behind the old Wannamaker quote: “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is, I don’t know which half.”

Here’s that fancy visual:

(DSP = demand-side platform, SSP = supply-side platform.)

Josh goes on to have some good analysis that’ll primarily be of interest to advertisers and the ad industry. But for publishers, the mere fact that half of the cash vanishes before it reaches them — 15 percent of it to, I dunno, werewolves? — should be enough to prompt some evening brown liquor. Google and Facebook have built giant businesses serving as middlemen between publisher and audience. But don’t forget about the anonymous ad tech firms who profit as middlemen between publisher and advertiser.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
“It has never been my expectation that every piece the New York Times publishes will confirm my personal worldview, but it was also never my expectation The Times would run an op-ed calling for state violence.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer’s journalists of color are taking a “sick and tired day” after “Buildings Matter, Too” headline
“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.”
VizPol takes a cue from bird-watching apps to help journalists identify unfamiliar political symbols
Built by researchers at Columbia University’s journalism and engineering schools and launched as an invite-only beta this week, VizPol can currently recognize 52 symbols.