As if there wasn’t enough Facebook news to digest already, another deep dive from The Washington Post this morning revealed that Facebook engineers changed the company’s algorithm to prioritize and elevate posts that elicited emoji reactions — many of which were rolled out in 2017. More specifically, the ranking algorithm treated reactions such as “angry,” “love,” “sad,” and “wow” as five times more valuable than traditional “likes” on the social media platform.
The problem with this plan for engagement: Other posts also likely to yield similar reactions were more likely to show up, only these posts were likely to also contain misinformation, spam, or forms of clickbait. One Facebook staffer, whose name was redacted in a dump of documents shared with the Securities and Exchange Commission by whistleblower and former Facebook employee Frances Haugen, had warned that this might happen; they were proven right.
According to the Post, “The company’s data scientists confirmed in 2019 that posts that sparked angry reaction emoji were disproportionately likely to include misinformation, toxicity and low-quality news.”
More on that:
That means Facebook for three years systematically amped up some of the worst of its platform, making it more prominent in users’ feeds and spreading it to a much wider audience. The power of the algorithmic promotion undermined the efforts of Facebook’s content moderators and integrity teams, who were fighting an uphill battle against toxic and harmful content.
This isn’t the first time that “anger” has reared its ugly head as a useful metric. Back in 2017, a report found that hyper-political publishers were especially adept at provoking the anger of their readers. And in 2019, another report found some of the effects of Facebook’s change to prioritizing meaningful interactions:
- It has pushed up articles on divisive topics like abortion, religion, and guns;
- politics rules; and
- the “angry” reaction (😡) dominates many pages, with “Fox News driving the most angry reactions of anyone, with nearly double that of anyone else.”
Facebook introduced the suite of “reaction” emojis in response to a decline in people talking to each other on the social platform, according to the report. Giving the reactions five times the value of a single like was Facebook’s effort to signal that “the post had made a greater emotional impression than a like; reacting with an emoji took an extra step beyond the single click or tap of the like button.”
Members of Facebook’s integrity teams raised concerns about the amplification of “anger” as a societal emotion, the documents reviewed by the Post show, but managers had a mixed record when it came to responding to these concerns.
According to the latest documents, even efforts to counteract this effect — when they were actually implemented — produced less-than-desirable results. For instance, even if Facebook employees tried to manipulate the score of a high-ranking post to get it to show up less often things often didn’t work out as planned.
If Facebook’s algorithms thought a post was bad, Facebook could cut its score in half, pushing most of instances of the post way down in users’ feeds. But a few posts could get scores as high as a billion, according to the documents. Cutting an astronomical score in half to “demote” it would still leave it with a score high enough to appear at the top of the user’s feed.
“Scary thought: civic demotions not working,” one Facebook employee noted.
The Post’s story details Facebook’s different attempts at dialing down this effect of amplifying reaction-driven posts.
When Facebook finally set the weight on the angry reaction to zero, users began to get less misinformation, less “disturbing” content and less “graphic violence,” company data scientists found. As it turned out, after years of advocacy and pushback, there wasn’t a trade-off after all. According to one of the documents, users’ level of activity on Facebook was unaffected.
Facebook’s reaction to this latest finding linking its algorithm and the prioritizing “anger” and posts that tend to invoke that emotion in users: “We continue to work to understand what content creates negative experiences, so we can reduce its distribution. This includes content that has a disproportionate amount of angry reactions, for example,” Facebook spokesperson Dani Lever told the Post.
119 comments:
It’s really a great and helpful piece of information. I’m happy that you simply shared this
helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this.
Thank you for sharing.
What’s up it’s me, I am also visiting this site daily,
this site is really fastidious and the people are genuinely sharing good thoughts.
Right away I am going to do my breakfast, when having my breakfast coming over again to read further news.
What’s up everyone, it’s my first go to see at this web page, and article is really fruitful in support of me, keep up posting such articles.
I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here.
The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish. nonetheless,
you command get bought an shakiness over
that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.
I’ve been exploring for a little bit for any
high quality articles or blog posts in this sort of area .
Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this web site.
Reading this information So i’m happy to exhibit that
I have a very just right uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed.
I most indisputably will make certain to do not forget this website and provides
it a glance on a constant basis.
I think that what you said made a ton of sense. However, what about this?
suppose you were to create a awesome title? I ain’t saying your information is not good.,
but what if you added a post title to possibly get people’s attention? I mean blog topic is kinda boring.
You might peek at Yahoo’s front page and see how they create post headlines to
get viewers to click. You might add a related video or a picture
or two to get people interested about everything’ve written. Just my opinion, it could make your blog a
little bit more interesting.
Asking questions are in fact nice thing if you are not
understanding something completely, but this piece of writing gives good understanding
even.
First of all I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to
ask if you don’t mind. I was curious to know how you center yourself
and clear your mind prior to writing. I have had trouble clearing my
thoughts in getting my ideas out there. I truly
do enjoy writing however it just seems like
the first 10 to 15 minutes are lost simply just trying to figure
out how to begin. Any recommendations or hints?
Appreciate it!
These are actually wonderful ideas in on the topic of blogging.
You have touched some pleasant points here.
Any way keep up wrinting.
This post is worth everyone’s attention. When can I find out more?
Hello there! This post could not be written much better!
Looking through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
He constantly kept preaching about this. I
will forward this information to him. Fairly certain he’ll have a very good read.
Thanks for sharing!
It is in point of fact a nice and helpful piece of info.
I’m glad that you simply shared this useful information with us.
Please stay us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.
Hi there to all, how is the whole thing, I think every one
is getting more from this site, and your views are nice in favor of new
users.
I do trust all the ideas you’ve introduced to your post.
They’re really convincing and can definitely work. Still, the posts are too
brief for starters. Could you please extend them a little from subsequent time?
Thanks for the post.
For most recent news you have to visit internet and
on world-wide-web I found this web site as a most excellent website for latest updates.
Thanks , I have recently been searching for information approximately this topic for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out till
now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?
Thanks , I have recently been searching for information approximately this topic for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out till
now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?
Thanks , I have recently been searching for information approximately this topic for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out till
now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?
Thanks , I have recently been searching for information approximately this topic for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out till
now. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?
Trackbacks:
Leave a comment