Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 20, 2016, 9:52 a.m.
Audience & Social
Mobile & Apps

Many more people consume news via browsers than via native apps — but those who do use apps spend much more time using them each month, according to a new study out today from the University of Texas’ Engaging News Project.

EngagingNewsStudy1The study analyzed comScore data (from September 2015) for 25 different news organizations. On average, people accessing sites via a mobile browser spent 3.4 minutes a month; via a desktop browser, 11.7 minutes a month. But people using a news organization’s mobile app, time spent soared to 95.7 minutes — and for tablet app users, a remarkable 111.7 minutes.

The flip side of this, though, is that there are many fewer of those app users. The study found roughly 18 desktop browser uniques and 12 mobile browser uniques for every 1 mobile app unique. It’s only logical that people with a strong enough connection to an outlet to download and use its app are more likely to be core, repeat readers than someone who sees a stray link on Facebook. (Nearly half of American adults get news on Facebook, according to a Pew study released earlier this year, and this analysis supports the idea that many visit a news site and then return quickly back to their feeds.)

“Our analysis shows that while questions may still remain about news apps, there’s no denying that users spend a significant amount of time on them,” Engaging News Project director Talia Stroud said in a release.

That question of building loyalty gains importance as Facebook takes steps to bring more content within its walls via Instant Articles, Facebook Live, and the preference it gives its native video player.

The study, meant to be a snapshot of the current digital performance of top news organizations, highlights a number of other trends in news consumption and presentation:

— More ads appear on desktop homepages than on mobile and tablet devices.

— Mobile and tablet apps are more likely to use “hamburger” navigation menus, indicated by a three-line graphic, than desktop versions.

— Apps offer a different news experience than browser-based news sites; they are more likely to give people the option to save content for later, less likely to require users to sign in, less likely to have comment sections, and less likely to include social media buttons.

— Those with low incomes and those who are Black / African-American tend to be underrepresented as news users, particularly on desktop and tablet browsers.

The full study is available here.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
“It has never been my expectation that every piece the New York Times publishes will confirm my personal worldview, but it was also never my expectation The Times would run an op-ed calling for state violence.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer’s journalists of color are taking a “sick and tired day” after “Buildings Matter, Too” headline
“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.”
VizPol takes a cue from bird-watching apps to help journalists identify unfamiliar political symbols
Built by researchers at Columbia University’s journalism and engineering schools and launched as an invite-only beta this week, VizPol can currently recognize 52 symbols.