Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Jan. 30, 2020, 1:56 p.m.
LINK: www.politico.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Sarah Scire   |   January 30, 2020

There’s misinformation that can impact elections indirectly by changing political opinions: “Hillary kills FBI agents,” “Pope Francis endorsed Trump,” “Macron is funded by the Saudis,” “Bolsonaro’s opponent wants to ban churches and turn your kids gay,” that sort of thing.

Then there’s misinformation that can impact elections directly by lying about the electoral process itself: flyers that say “Don’t forget to vote Wednesday!” when the election’s on Tuesday, text messages that intentionally direct people to the wrong polling place, or Facebook posts that spread bogus absentee ballot deadlines.

That second kind has gotten more attention this week, including Twitter’s announcement that U.S. users will now be able to report tweets with misleading information about voting.

Tweets that seek to suppress turnout or mislead voters violate Twitter’s rules and, for the first time, users can flag tweets using the same drop-down menu previously available for reporting abusive material or spam.

While it’s the first time the tool is being offered in the U.S., users in India were given a similar option last April as the country’s national elections — the largest in the world — approached. Twitter also rolled out a version for the European Union election that took place that same month.

The announcement from Twitter came shortly after Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren shared a plan to impose civil and criminal penalties on those who intentionally share election-related misinformation for the purpose of voter suppression.

(Ironically enough, Warren’s proposal was subject to its own quasi-misinformation yesterday when CNBC published a story that implied she was trying to criminalize all misinformation — which was then shared across Twitter in shocked tones. CNBC eventually updated the headline.)

The reporting tool may be a step in the right direction for Twitter as it seeks to address concerns from policy makers and the public about whether they’ve done enough to counter campaigns that seek to influence elections by spreading false information on their platform. According to a new study by the Pew Research Center, nearly half of Americans say they don’t trust Twitter as a source for political news. (Only Facebook was distrusted by a higher proportion — 59 percent — among the major social media sites.)

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
“It has never been my expectation that every piece the New York Times publishes will confirm my personal worldview, but it was also never my expectation The Times would run an op-ed calling for state violence.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer’s journalists of color are taking a “sick and tired day” after “Buildings Matter, Too” headline
“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.”
VizPol takes a cue from bird-watching apps to help journalists identify unfamiliar political symbols
Built by researchers at Columbia University’s journalism and engineering schools and launched as an invite-only beta this week, VizPol can currently recognize 52 symbols.