The app — for now, iOS only — is “currently an exclusive benefit for New York Times news subscribers.” Here’s some of what it includes:
Other audio offerings — including the Times’ flagship podcast The Daily and shows like Serial, The Ezra Klein Show, The Run-Up, and Hard Fork — remain free. They can be streamed from the new app, as well as everywhere else you already listen to podcasts.
Paula Szuchman, director of audio for The New York Times, described the new show, The Headlines, as “a sibling” to The Daily. While The Daily typically dives deep into one story for 20-ish minutes, The Headlines covers three news stories in roughly half the time.
“It’s designed to help catch a listener up on the biggest news of the day, reflecting the breadth and depth of Times reporting and signaling the areas of coverage our newsroom is digging into,” Szuchman said. “We heard from listeners that they want more — that The Daily scratches an itch but they also want to be informed of other stories they should know about.”
Like some of its most obvious competitors — including NPR’s Up First, which also promises the day’s top stories in under 10 minutes — The Headlines will publish early every weekday morning to be available for commuters.
During its inaugural week, the Times will include The Headlines in The Daily’s feed so those millions of listeners “can see what we’re up to, and how the two shows deliver a complete sense of the day’s biggest stories,” Szuchman said.
The big question: How many people — even if they are loyal subscribers — will really want to download a separate app to listen to audio content only from The New York Times?
I don’t understand the strategy for this, at all.
It’s built for people who love NYT podcasts (check) but who don’t want to listen to podcasts made by anyone else (what?). https://t.co/XUMqSNn3sG
— Peter Kafka (@pkafka) May 17, 2023
Why would you go through the trouble of producing audio content only to limit it to a new app accessible to existing subscribers??
Why not put in the main app or make the content app agnostic?
There’s a graveyard of apps that have tried this! Ask the big media conglomerates! https://t.co/5jzVRggx6r
— Sar Haribhakti (@sarthakgh) May 17, 2023
New York Times Audio might best be understood as a retention tool. The Times says their success with subscriber-only newsletters showed that subscribers who engage with exclusive content are more active — and more likely to stay paying subscribers — than those who do not. Adding subscriber-only content in the audio realm, they figure, allows the Times to be relevant even when subscribers aren’t sitting down to read. As the Times’ Stephanie Preiss put it to Vanity Fair: “How do we get every second of your day?”
I *think* the big selling point is “top articles read aloud, for people who commute by car” which is personally pretty appealing to me
— Katie Notopoulos (@katienotopoulos) May 17, 2023
It's possible that a segment of NYT subs are interested in consuming audio from NYT (audio articles + podcasts) and are not podcast listeners in the classic sense. Also if the curation and topical features are better than Spotify/Apple, users might also find it more convenient.
— Misha Zilman (@MishaZilman) May 17, 2023
26 comments:
rxvTpVCFdilaZuWU
OKbtfyZXpCaeQJPD
BCHfKeqVSr
SXIAKybCwc
UVJLAgItlbOyYqPa
OJSlFdmvZ
nfLvxTlwNAIuGKs
SjPCuzlkbpLZUoQm
VsfGCoblPYtd
yJkXZTRhtgHelVu
XxmQKarCkYAi
iwFnqsoSYJuR
atUCzIYO
IAXLJHonwe
TpKmScfuQqGU
ieIXfNVSwL
uNhwVMkBptY
kJimLFWGBqVITZ
BCkmhIyesKbuHcdi
qWprHRNjKAtXdk
fSkHizuPQgc
cztAeXMaZYnpFTbj
HMsSOXhVNWexQ
slynducamP
vRAtjZdaTHgfJSIV
Good day! I simply want to give a huge thumbs up for the good data you may have here on this post. I shall be coming again to your blog for extra soon.
Trackbacks:
Leave a comment