Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Evoking empathy or seeking solidarity: Which is preferable when covering people without homes?
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 17, 2014, 11:56 a.m.
Business Models
LINK: digiday.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   June 17, 2014

One theme for paywalls in 2014 is added complexity — complexity in the service of hitting a wider array of price points. The New York Times is the leading example; Sam Kirkland had a piece Friday exploring the various fares available. Eventually, the number of paying customers for an all-access model will plateau; smaller products, featuring sectioned-off portions of Times content, make sense as a Phase 2.

nytimes-cookingWith NYT Now launched at $2 a week, NYT Opinion at $1.50, and Times Premier at $2.50 over whatever else you’re paying, the final expected new Times paid product is its Cooking app, which has debuted in beta, but without a public pricing model. It’s a lovely recipe site, but there are lots of recipe sites, at least some of them lovely, and it’s been unclear (to me, at least) what a premium strategy might look like.

Digiday’s Lucia Moses has some clues:

A survey sent to subscribers hints at how that might change once the full site launches. Access to the recipe archive and features like the recipe box would continue to be free, according to the survey.

Subscribers, meanwhile, would get “premium healthy cooking” features: nutritional information for all recipes, healthy meal plans picked by Times editors, interactive grocery lists, and the ability to sort recipes saved to the recipe box based on healthy ingredients.

That’s a pretty clear upsell — and that’s before you get to the Mark-Bittman-will-be-my-friend-for-a-few-dollars-a-month angle.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Evoking empathy or seeking solidarity: Which is preferable when covering people without homes?
Plus: How journalists cover global infectious disease, how audiences think news organizations should improve trust, and “news minimalists and omnivores.”
Lots of visible likes and shares on social lead people to spread more misinformation
When people saw that a questionable piece of content had been liked and shared lots of times, they were more likely to share it themselves
How much does fake coronavirus news affect people’s real-life health behavior?
And what about Trump’s hydroxychloroquine and bleach proclamations?