Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
On a rough day for American newspapers, investors aren’t buying Gannett’s story and Tribune’s not done chopping
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 17, 2014, 11:56 a.m.
Business Models
LINK: digiday.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   June 17, 2014

One theme for paywalls in 2014 is added complexity — complexity in the service of hitting a wider array of price points. The New York Times is the leading example; Sam Kirkland had a piece Friday exploring the various fares available. Eventually, the number of paying customers for an all-access model will plateau; smaller products, featuring sectioned-off portions of Times content, make sense as a Phase 2.

nytimes-cookingWith NYT Now launched at $2 a week, NYT Opinion at $1.50, and Times Premier at $2.50 over whatever else you’re paying, the final expected new Times paid product is its Cooking app, which has debuted in beta, but without a public pricing model. It’s a lovely recipe site, but there are lots of recipe sites, at least some of them lovely, and it’s been unclear (to me, at least) what a premium strategy might look like.

Digiday’s Lucia Moses has some clues:

A survey sent to subscribers hints at how that might change once the full site launches. Access to the recipe archive and features like the recipe box would continue to be free, according to the survey.

Subscribers, meanwhile, would get “premium healthy cooking” features: nutritional information for all recipes, healthy meal plans picked by Times editors, interactive grocery lists, and the ability to sort recipes saved to the recipe box based on healthy ingredients.

That’s a pretty clear upsell — and that’s before you get to the Mark-Bittman-will-be-my-friend-for-a-few-dollars-a-month angle.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
On a rough day for American newspapers, investors aren’t buying Gannett’s story and Tribune’s not done chopping
“I just don’t believe where the stock is trading” is not a thing you want to hear from one of your biggest investors. And in Chicago, some of the most prestigious positions in journalism are now either eliminated or part-time gigs.
No one cares that you were editor of your college newspaper: Reporter bios don’t improve readers’ trust in your news outlet
Crave the smell of barbecue? Love your kids? Won a Pulitzer? None of it seems to move the needle on how your readers perceive your work.
Maybe publisher cooperation is a path forward for news, but it shouldn’t be at the expense of public media
In Norway and Sweden, a survey finds some people won’t pay for online news because the news from their free public broadcaster is good enough. That’s a feature, not a bug.