More news is the problem, not the solution

“Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.”

At the beginning of the pandemic, way back in early 2020, World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that the world was facing not one but two major crises: the pandemic, yes, but also what he called the “infodemic” — a deluge of information so overwhelming that it becomes impossible for ordinary people to figure out what is or isn’t credible information.

The symptoms of the infodemic are all too obvious: the rise of conspiracy theories like QAnon, the vast numbers of people who refuse to get vaccinated for Covid-19, and the persistent untruths which fuel so much of today’s politics, no matter how often they are dutifully debunked.

As journalists, we’re on the frontlines of the infodemic. But instead of coming up with solutions, too many of us are part of the problem, dumping vast amounts of information on our audiences, across multiple platforms, and expecting them to have the tools — and the time — to process it all.

This is a function, perhaps, of the infinite nature of the internet: There are no limits on how many stories we can publish, or how long those stories should be. It doesn’t help that the algorithms that define our online existence are set up to reward more pages and more clicks.

But this approach fails to recognize that the nature of journalism has fundamentally changed in the 21st century. In an information-scarce environment, such as the pre-internet age, journalism existed to find and distribute news to an audience, because they couldn’t get that news anywhere else.

Today, everyone with access to the internet lives in an information-rich environment, and the primary role of effective journalism is different. Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.

Ironically, the news product that does this best is an old-fashioned print newspaper, where stories are carefully ordered and, because space is at a premium, ruthlessly cut to fit. The hard work is done in the newsroom by people whose job it is to process information; all readers have to do is to keep turning the pages.

The news product that does this worst is a news website, where readers are faced on every page with a dizzying array of stories, each of which might link to a dozen other stories on a dozen other websites. It’s simply too much information to take in at once, and the decision fatigue sets in immediately. Many readers switch off, or they go somewhere else that makes it much easier to access information — even if that information is less reliable.

As journalists, we need to think a lot more carefully about how much information we are putting out into the world and how we present it. Are we countering the infodemic or contributing to it? What we do publish needs to be meaningful, high quality, and respectful of our audience’s time. (For example, if the editing is good enough, most stories can run at half the word count without losing meaning or style — including, no doubt, this one.)

Anything else and the infodemic wins.

Simon Allison is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Continent, Africa’s most widely distributed newspaper.

At the beginning of the pandemic, way back in early 2020, World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that the world was facing not one but two major crises: the pandemic, yes, but also what he called the “infodemic” — a deluge of information so overwhelming that it becomes impossible for ordinary people to figure out what is or isn’t credible information.

The symptoms of the infodemic are all too obvious: the rise of conspiracy theories like QAnon, the vast numbers of people who refuse to get vaccinated for Covid-19, and the persistent untruths which fuel so much of today’s politics, no matter how often they are dutifully debunked.

As journalists, we’re on the frontlines of the infodemic. But instead of coming up with solutions, too many of us are part of the problem, dumping vast amounts of information on our audiences, across multiple platforms, and expecting them to have the tools — and the time — to process it all.

This is a function, perhaps, of the infinite nature of the internet: There are no limits on how many stories we can publish, or how long those stories should be. It doesn’t help that the algorithms that define our online existence are set up to reward more pages and more clicks.

But this approach fails to recognize that the nature of journalism has fundamentally changed in the 21st century. In an information-scarce environment, such as the pre-internet age, journalism existed to find and distribute news to an audience, because they couldn’t get that news anywhere else.

Today, everyone with access to the internet lives in an information-rich environment, and the primary role of effective journalism is different. Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.

Ironically, the news product that does this best is an old-fashioned print newspaper, where stories are carefully ordered and, because space is at a premium, ruthlessly cut to fit. The hard work is done in the newsroom by people whose job it is to process information; all readers have to do is to keep turning the pages.

The news product that does this worst is a news website, where readers are faced on every page with a dizzying array of stories, each of which might link to a dozen other stories on a dozen other websites. It’s simply too much information to take in at once, and the decision fatigue sets in immediately. Many readers switch off, or they go somewhere else that makes it much easier to access information — even if that information is less reliable.

As journalists, we need to think a lot more carefully about how much information we are putting out into the world and how we present it. Are we countering the infodemic or contributing to it? What we do publish needs to be meaningful, high quality, and respectful of our audience’s time. (For example, if the editing is good enough, most stories can run at half the word count without losing meaning or style — including, no doubt, this one.)

Anything else and the infodemic wins.

Simon Allison is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Continent, Africa’s most widely distributed newspaper.

Millie Tran

Joanne McNeil

Tony Baranowski

Sam Guzik

Chase Davis

Christina Shih

j. Siguru Wahutu

Kristen Jeffers

Jennifer Brandel

Errin Haines

Christoph Mergerson

S. Mitra Kalita

Joni Deutsch

Gabe Schneider

Whitney Phillips

Stephen Fowler

Chicas Poderosas

Catalina Albeanu

Anika Anand

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Jim Friedlich

Nikki Usher

Cindy Royal

Matt DeRienzo

Larry Ryckman

Cherian George

Sarah Stonbely

Jennifer Coogan

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Mary Walter-Brown

Julia Angwin

Victor Pickard

Jesse Holcomb

David Cohn

Zizi Papacharissi

Kristen Muller

Meena Thiruvengadam

Burt Herman

An Xiao Mina

Don Day

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Mario García

Paul Cheung

Michael W. Wagner

Richard Tofel

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Anita Varma

Tom Trewinnard

Ariel Zirulnick

Simon Galperin

Daniel Eilemberg

Joy Mayer

Candace Amos

John Davidow

Rachel Glickhouse

Tamar Charney

Wilson Liévano

Gonzalo del Peon

Raney Aronson-Rath

Ståle Grut

Kerri Hoffman

James Green

Natalia Viana

Parker Molloy

Mandy Jenkins

Jody Brannon

Alice Antheaume

Jessica Clark

Sarah Marshall

Joe Amditis

Julia Munslow

Cristina Tardáguila

Gordon Crovitz

Eric Nuzum

Simon Allison

Janelle Salanga

Doris Truong

Matt Karolian

Stefanie Murray

Anthony Nadler

Moreno Cruz Osório

Shalabh Upadhyay

Matthew Pressman

Melody Kramer

Joshua P. Darr

Robert Hernandez

Jonas Kaiser

Izabella Kaminska

Juleyka Lantigua

Megan McCarthy

David Skok

Amara Aguilar

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Brian Moritz

Andrew Freedman

A.J. Bauer

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Francesco Zaffarano

Mike Rispoli

Amy Schmitz Weiss