More news is the problem, not the solution

“Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.”

At the beginning of the pandemic, way back in early 2020, World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that the world was facing not one but two major crises: the pandemic, yes, but also what he called the “infodemic” — a deluge of information so overwhelming that it becomes impossible for ordinary people to figure out what is or isn’t credible information.

The symptoms of the infodemic are all too obvious: the rise of conspiracy theories like QAnon, the vast numbers of people who refuse to get vaccinated for Covid-19, and the persistent untruths which fuel so much of today’s politics, no matter how often they are dutifully debunked.

As journalists, we’re on the frontlines of the infodemic. But instead of coming up with solutions, too many of us are part of the problem, dumping vast amounts of information on our audiences, across multiple platforms, and expecting them to have the tools — and the time — to process it all.

This is a function, perhaps, of the infinite nature of the internet: There are no limits on how many stories we can publish, or how long those stories should be. It doesn’t help that the algorithms that define our online existence are set up to reward more pages and more clicks.

But this approach fails to recognize that the nature of journalism has fundamentally changed in the 21st century. In an information-scarce environment, such as the pre-internet age, journalism existed to find and distribute news to an audience, because they couldn’t get that news anywhere else.

Today, everyone with access to the internet lives in an information-rich environment, and the primary role of effective journalism is different. Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.

Ironically, the news product that does this best is an old-fashioned print newspaper, where stories are carefully ordered and, because space is at a premium, ruthlessly cut to fit. The hard work is done in the newsroom by people whose job it is to process information; all readers have to do is to keep turning the pages.

The news product that does this worst is a news website, where readers are faced on every page with a dizzying array of stories, each of which might link to a dozen other stories on a dozen other websites. It’s simply too much information to take in at once, and the decision fatigue sets in immediately. Many readers switch off, or they go somewhere else that makes it much easier to access information — even if that information is less reliable.

As journalists, we need to think a lot more carefully about how much information we are putting out into the world and how we present it. Are we countering the infodemic or contributing to it? What we do publish needs to be meaningful, high quality, and respectful of our audience’s time. (For example, if the editing is good enough, most stories can run at half the word count without losing meaning or style — including, no doubt, this one.)

Anything else and the infodemic wins.

Simon Allison is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Continent, Africa’s most widely distributed newspaper.

At the beginning of the pandemic, way back in early 2020, World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that the world was facing not one but two major crises: the pandemic, yes, but also what he called the “infodemic” — a deluge of information so overwhelming that it becomes impossible for ordinary people to figure out what is or isn’t credible information.

The symptoms of the infodemic are all too obvious: the rise of conspiracy theories like QAnon, the vast numbers of people who refuse to get vaccinated for Covid-19, and the persistent untruths which fuel so much of today’s politics, no matter how often they are dutifully debunked.

As journalists, we’re on the frontlines of the infodemic. But instead of coming up with solutions, too many of us are part of the problem, dumping vast amounts of information on our audiences, across multiple platforms, and expecting them to have the tools — and the time — to process it all.

This is a function, perhaps, of the infinite nature of the internet: There are no limits on how many stories we can publish, or how long those stories should be. It doesn’t help that the algorithms that define our online existence are set up to reward more pages and more clicks.

But this approach fails to recognize that the nature of journalism has fundamentally changed in the 21st century. In an information-scarce environment, such as the pre-internet age, journalism existed to find and distribute news to an audience, because they couldn’t get that news anywhere else.

Today, everyone with access to the internet lives in an information-rich environment, and the primary role of effective journalism is different. Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.

Ironically, the news product that does this best is an old-fashioned print newspaper, where stories are carefully ordered and, because space is at a premium, ruthlessly cut to fit. The hard work is done in the newsroom by people whose job it is to process information; all readers have to do is to keep turning the pages.

The news product that does this worst is a news website, where readers are faced on every page with a dizzying array of stories, each of which might link to a dozen other stories on a dozen other websites. It’s simply too much information to take in at once, and the decision fatigue sets in immediately. Many readers switch off, or they go somewhere else that makes it much easier to access information — even if that information is less reliable.

As journalists, we need to think a lot more carefully about how much information we are putting out into the world and how we present it. Are we countering the infodemic or contributing to it? What we do publish needs to be meaningful, high quality, and respectful of our audience’s time. (For example, if the editing is good enough, most stories can run at half the word count without losing meaning or style — including, no doubt, this one.)

Anything else and the infodemic wins.

Simon Allison is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Continent, Africa’s most widely distributed newspaper.

Matt Karolian

Mario García

j. Siguru Wahutu

Mary Walter-Brown

Don Day

Robert Hernandez

Mike Rispoli

Larry Ryckman

Cristina Tardáguila

Gonzalo del Peon

Chase Davis

Joe Amditis

Jennifer Brandel

S. Mitra Kalita

Kerri Hoffman

Candace Amos

Richard Tofel

Shalabh Upadhyay

Raney Aronson-Rath

Mandy Jenkins

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Julia Angwin

Cherian George

Joanne McNeil

Alice Antheaume

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Parker Molloy

Janelle Salanga

Tamar Charney

Simon Allison

Julia Munslow

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Sam Guzik

Matthew Pressman

Sarah Stonbely

Izabella Kaminska

An Xiao Mina

Gordon Crovitz

Ståle Grut

Anita Varma

Christoph Mergerson

Simon Galperin

Ariel Zirulnick

Tony Baranowski

Victor Pickard

Jennifer Coogan

John Davidow

Amy Schmitz Weiss

James Green

Zizi Papacharissi

Joy Mayer

Brian Moritz

Gabe Schneider

David Skok

Cindy Royal

Whitney Phillips

Andrew Freedman

Joni Deutsch

Kristen Jeffers

Stephen Fowler

Anika Anand

Meena Thiruvengadam

Jessica Clark

Juleyka Lantigua

Jesse Holcomb

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Christina Shih

Millie Tran

Francesco Zaffarano

Rachel Glickhouse

Tom Trewinnard

Sarah Marshall

Burt Herman

Michael W. Wagner

Jim Friedlich

Nikki Usher

Joshua P. Darr

Matt DeRienzo

A.J. Bauer

Jonas Kaiser

Kristen Muller

Moreno Cruz Osório

Paul Cheung

Chicas Poderosas

Daniel Eilemberg

Catalina Albeanu

Anthony Nadler

David Cohn

Amara Aguilar

Natalia Viana

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Melody Kramer

Errin Haines

Stefanie Murray

Megan McCarthy

Jody Brannon

Wilson Liévano

Doris Truong

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Eric Nuzum