More news is the problem, not the solution

“Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.”

At the beginning of the pandemic, way back in early 2020, World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that the world was facing not one but two major crises: the pandemic, yes, but also what he called the “infodemic” — a deluge of information so overwhelming that it becomes impossible for ordinary people to figure out what is or isn’t credible information.

The symptoms of the infodemic are all too obvious: the rise of conspiracy theories like QAnon, the vast numbers of people who refuse to get vaccinated for Covid-19, and the persistent untruths which fuel so much of today’s politics, no matter how often they are dutifully debunked.

As journalists, we’re on the frontlines of the infodemic. But instead of coming up with solutions, too many of us are part of the problem, dumping vast amounts of information on our audiences, across multiple platforms, and expecting them to have the tools — and the time — to process it all.

This is a function, perhaps, of the infinite nature of the internet: There are no limits on how many stories we can publish, or how long those stories should be. It doesn’t help that the algorithms that define our online existence are set up to reward more pages and more clicks.

But this approach fails to recognize that the nature of journalism has fundamentally changed in the 21st century. In an information-scarce environment, such as the pre-internet age, journalism existed to find and distribute news to an audience, because they couldn’t get that news anywhere else.

Today, everyone with access to the internet lives in an information-rich environment, and the primary role of effective journalism is different. Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.

Ironically, the news product that does this best is an old-fashioned print newspaper, where stories are carefully ordered and, because space is at a premium, ruthlessly cut to fit. The hard work is done in the newsroom by people whose job it is to process information; all readers have to do is to keep turning the pages.

The news product that does this worst is a news website, where readers are faced on every page with a dizzying array of stories, each of which might link to a dozen other stories on a dozen other websites. It’s simply too much information to take in at once, and the decision fatigue sets in immediately. Many readers switch off, or they go somewhere else that makes it much easier to access information — even if that information is less reliable.

As journalists, we need to think a lot more carefully about how much information we are putting out into the world and how we present it. Are we countering the infodemic or contributing to it? What we do publish needs to be meaningful, high quality, and respectful of our audience’s time. (For example, if the editing is good enough, most stories can run at half the word count without losing meaning or style — including, no doubt, this one.)

Anything else and the infodemic wins.

Simon Allison is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Continent, Africa’s most widely distributed newspaper.

At the beginning of the pandemic, way back in early 2020, World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that the world was facing not one but two major crises: the pandemic, yes, but also what he called the “infodemic” — a deluge of information so overwhelming that it becomes impossible for ordinary people to figure out what is or isn’t credible information.

The symptoms of the infodemic are all too obvious: the rise of conspiracy theories like QAnon, the vast numbers of people who refuse to get vaccinated for Covid-19, and the persistent untruths which fuel so much of today’s politics, no matter how often they are dutifully debunked.

As journalists, we’re on the frontlines of the infodemic. But instead of coming up with solutions, too many of us are part of the problem, dumping vast amounts of information on our audiences, across multiple platforms, and expecting them to have the tools — and the time — to process it all.

This is a function, perhaps, of the infinite nature of the internet: There are no limits on how many stories we can publish, or how long those stories should be. It doesn’t help that the algorithms that define our online existence are set up to reward more pages and more clicks.

But this approach fails to recognize that the nature of journalism has fundamentally changed in the 21st century. In an information-scarce environment, such as the pre-internet age, journalism existed to find and distribute news to an audience, because they couldn’t get that news anywhere else.

Today, everyone with access to the internet lives in an information-rich environment, and the primary role of effective journalism is different. Journalism now functions to condense, contextualize, and curate the sheer volume of information that is out there and accessible to all — to stand between readers and the abyss of the infodemic.

Ironically, the news product that does this best is an old-fashioned print newspaper, where stories are carefully ordered and, because space is at a premium, ruthlessly cut to fit. The hard work is done in the newsroom by people whose job it is to process information; all readers have to do is to keep turning the pages.

The news product that does this worst is a news website, where readers are faced on every page with a dizzying array of stories, each of which might link to a dozen other stories on a dozen other websites. It’s simply too much information to take in at once, and the decision fatigue sets in immediately. Many readers switch off, or they go somewhere else that makes it much easier to access information — even if that information is less reliable.

As journalists, we need to think a lot more carefully about how much information we are putting out into the world and how we present it. Are we countering the infodemic or contributing to it? What we do publish needs to be meaningful, high quality, and respectful of our audience’s time. (For example, if the editing is good enough, most stories can run at half the word count without losing meaning or style — including, no doubt, this one.)

Anything else and the infodemic wins.

Simon Allison is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Continent, Africa’s most widely distributed newspaper.

Kristen Jeffers

Jonas Kaiser

Simon Allison

S. Mitra Kalita

Matt Karolian

Joshua P. Darr

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Millie Tran

David Cohn

Jennifer Brandel

j. Siguru Wahutu

Joe Amditis

Megan McCarthy

Tamar Charney

James Green

Zizi Papacharissi

Ariel Zirulnick

A.J. Bauer

Gonzalo del Peon

Chase Davis

Kerri Hoffman

Joni Deutsch

John Davidow

Errin Haines

Paul Cheung

Daniel Eilemberg

Julia Munslow

Cherian George

David Skok

Jody Brannon

Christoph Mergerson

Shalabh Upadhyay

Chicas Poderosas

Burt Herman

Joy Mayer

Natalia Viana

Sam Guzik

Mario García

Eric Nuzum

Brian Moritz

Nikki Usher

Amara Aguilar

Sarah Marshall

Catalina Albeanu

Janelle Salanga

Joanne McNeil

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Cristina Tardáguila

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Matt DeRienzo

Parker Molloy

Izabella Kaminska

Cindy Royal

Rachel Glickhouse

Tony Baranowski

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Richard Tofel

Sarah Stonbely

Candace Amos

Jessica Clark

Raney Aronson-Rath

Moreno Cruz Osório

Wilson Liévano

Andrew Freedman

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Stephen Fowler

Jim Friedlich

Julia Angwin

Stefanie Murray

Christina Shih

Francesco Zaffarano

Juleyka Lantigua

Matthew Pressman

Mike Rispoli

Jennifer Coogan

Jesse Holcomb

Victor Pickard

Don Day

Tom Trewinnard

Ståle Grut

AX Mina

Simon Galperin

Anika Anand

Anita Varma

Melody Kramer

Whitney Phillips

Mandy Jenkins

Larry Ryckman

Anthony Nadler

Kristen Muller

Alice Antheaume

Mary Walter-Brown

Doris Truong

Robert Hernandez

Meena Thiruvengadam

Gabe Schneider

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Michael W. Wagner

Gordon Crovitz