Fixing journalism’s credit score to earn back audience trust

“As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default on it before readers begin to lose trust.”

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

Anita Varma

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Chase Davis

Rachel Glickhouse

Stephen Fowler

Jim Friedlich

Mike Rispoli

Joe Amditis

S. Mitra Kalita

Chicas Poderosas

Burt Herman

Julia Munslow

Kerri Hoffman

Stefanie Murray

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Sam Guzik

Errin Haines

Victor Pickard

Janelle Salanga

Jennifer Coogan

Cherian George

An Xiao Mina

Tom Trewinnard

Kristen Muller

Juleyka Lantigua

Doris Truong

Matt Karolian

Francesco Zaffarano

Sarah Marshall

Megan McCarthy

Zizi Papacharissi

Alice Antheaume

Cindy Royal

Anthony Nadler

Richard Tofel

Christina Shih

Paul Cheung

Sarah Stonbely

Cristina Tardáguila

Gabe Schneider

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Joanne McNeil

Julia Angwin

Joy Mayer

Parker Molloy

Mary Walter-Brown

Wilson Liévano

Matthew Pressman

Jesse Holcomb

Ståle Grut

Eric Nuzum

Jennifer Brandel

Robert Hernandez

Simon Allison

Andrew Freedman

Joshua P. Darr

Simon Galperin

Catalina Albeanu

Natalia Viana

Brian Moritz

Izabella Kaminska

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Shalabh Upadhyay

James Green

Don Day

Anika Anand

Whitney Phillips

A.J. Bauer

Michael W. Wagner

Tony Baranowski

Moreno Cruz Osório

Gordon Crovitz

Kristen Jeffers

Candace Amos

Daniel Eilemberg

Jody Brannon

Nikki Usher

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Gonzalo del Peon

Raney Aronson-Rath

Millie Tran

Amara Aguilar

Christoph Mergerson

j. Siguru Wahutu

Tamar Charney

Mandy Jenkins

Meena Thiruvengadam

Mario García

David Cohn

Joni Deutsch

Larry Ryckman

David Skok

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Jonas Kaiser

Melody Kramer

John Davidow

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Matt DeRienzo

Jessica Clark

Ariel Zirulnick