Fixing journalism’s credit score to earn back audience trust

“As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default on it before readers begin to lose trust.”

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

Alice Antheaume

Jonas Kaiser

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Joanne McNeil

Catalina Albeanu

Tom Trewinnard

Megan McCarthy

Raney Aronson-Rath

Jesse Holcomb

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Sam Guzik

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Mario García

Jesenia De Moya Correa

David Skok

Joe Amditis

Stefanie Murray

Mike Rispoli

Laxmi Parthasarathy

j. Siguru Wahutu

Paul Cheung

Whitney Phillips

Burt Herman

Millie Tran

Gordon Crovitz

Stephen Fowler

Matt Karolian

Michael W. Wagner

Anthony Nadler

Ariel Zirulnick

Simon Galperin

Jessica Clark

Francesco Zaffarano

Sarah Stonbely

An Xiao Mina

Chase Davis

Nikki Usher

Julia Munslow

Matt DeRienzo

Simon Allison

Tamar Charney

Jennifer Coogan

Anita Varma

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Amara Aguilar

Chicas Poderosas

Andrew Freedman

Jennifer Brandel

Larry Ryckman

A.J. Bauer

Joshua P. Darr

Kerri Hoffman

Candace Amos

David Cohn

Kristen Muller

Cherian George

Natalia Viana

Mary Walter-Brown

Richard Tofel

Melody Kramer

Juleyka Lantigua

Eric Nuzum

Jim Friedlich

Errin Haines

Rachel Glickhouse

Meena Thiruvengadam

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Sarah Marshall

Brian Moritz

Cindy Royal

Gonzalo del Peon

Mandy Jenkins

Joni Deutsch

Shalabh Upadhyay

Kristen Jeffers

Gabe Schneider

Janelle Salanga

Izabella Kaminska

Robert Hernandez

Victor Pickard

Christina Shih

Wilson Liévano

Tony Baranowski

Doris Truong

Jody Brannon

John Davidow

Zizi Papacharissi

Don Day

Matthew Pressman

S. Mitra Kalita

Cristina Tardáguila

Anika Anand

Parker Molloy

James Green

Moreno Cruz Osório

Christoph Mergerson

Julia Angwin

Joy Mayer

Ståle Grut

Daniel Eilemberg