Fixing journalism’s credit score to earn back audience trust

“As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default on it before readers begin to lose trust.”

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

Meena Thiruvengadam

Amara Aguilar

Juleyka Lantigua

Raney Aronson-Rath

Michael W. Wagner

j. Siguru Wahutu

Francesco Zaffarano

Matthew Pressman

Matt Karolian

Zizi Papacharissi

Julia Angwin

Natalia Viana

Simon Allison

Kristen Muller

Ståle Grut

James Green

Tom Trewinnard

Tamar Charney

Laxmi Parthasarathy

John Davidow

Joanne McNeil

Cherian George

Jim Friedlich

Kerri Hoffman

Chicas Poderosas

Anita Varma

Don Day

Tony Baranowski

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Ariel Zirulnick

Gordon Crovitz

Jennifer Brandel

David Cohn

Cindy Royal

An Xiao Mina

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Victor Pickard

Mary Walter-Brown

Jonas Kaiser

Daniel Eilemberg

Robert Hernandez

Jessica Clark

A.J. Bauer

Cristina Tardáguila

Janelle Salanga

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Rachel Glickhouse

Catalina Albeanu

Anthony Nadler

Joe Amditis

Gonzalo del Peon

Jesse Holcomb

Christina Shih

Chase Davis

Errin Haines

Paul Cheung

David Skok

Stephen Fowler

Sarah Marshall

Andrew Freedman

Megan McCarthy

Mandy Jenkins

Doris Truong

Sarah Stonbely

Sam Guzik

Anika Anand

Wilson Liévano

Alice Antheaume

Nikki Usher

Jody Brannon

Richard Tofel

Shalabh Upadhyay

Matt DeRienzo

Melody Kramer

Gabe Schneider

Izabella Kaminska

Christoph Mergerson

Joshua P. Darr

Simon Galperin

Larry Ryckman

Whitney Phillips

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Burt Herman

Stefanie Murray

Joni Deutsch

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Eric Nuzum

Moreno Cruz Osório

S. Mitra Kalita

Julia Munslow

Mario García

Candace Amos

Joy Mayer

Parker Molloy

Millie Tran

Mike Rispoli

Brian Moritz

Jennifer Coogan

Kristen Jeffers