Fixing journalism’s credit score to earn back audience trust

“As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default on it before readers begin to lose trust.”

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

This will be the year the mainstream media complex — specifically managers and editors — finally begins to understand the ramifications of losing their audience’s trust.

It’s a loss that transcends the Trump and fake news phenomena. Rather, it’s about corrupting forces to which journalists themselves are largely oblivious. Most of the blame, I think, lies with structural, economic, and bureaucratic forces that have come to underestimate editorial risks and misallocate resources in a bid to maximize returns from reach, digitalization, and standardization.

Such forces unwittingly favor — even in the most upstanding organizations — predictable clicks drawn from knee-jerk, and often erroneous, takes that ride the consensus wave, while sensationalizing content and narrowing the public debate spectrum. The result is an eschewing of contrarian quality reads that might be slower to come to market but are much harder to discredit over time because they have been properly researched, considered, and tested. It is simply safer to ride the consensus wave, even in the supposedly high-quality and deeply researched section of the media.

As in banking, there are only so many times a journalistic outlet can misprice a story and suffer a proverbial default before readers begin to lose trust in the publisher in question (such as when the story you’ve been pushing turns out not to be true or badly misinformed). In terms of abuse of public trust, today is analogous to the post-2008 era in banking. Eventually, eyeballs and subscriptions will flow to more credible competition. Indeed, the biggest reason they haven’t yet abandoned the mainstream in sizable volume is that a credible competitor that addresses most of these issues on an economically scaled basis doesn’t yet exist.

To date, most challengers have focused on addressing the symptoms — and not underlying causes — of media discontent. And so, challengers orient themselves towards ever more partisan offerings or those focused on giving a platform to voices rejected by the incumbent system.

Substack is the most prominent of these challengers. It’s carved out a reputation for itself as a neutral platform that is largely indifferent to the politics of any particular writer. Instead, it is happy to give shelter to mainstream journalistic defectors of all shapes, flavors, sizes, and inclinations.

While this is a step forward, it is not a long-lasting solution. This is because Substack’s platform fails to address the credit risk at the heart of the modern-day journalistic quagmire in an economically viable way. The platform’s gated nature and dependence on super-star names, meanwhile, poses editorial scaling challenges.

If journalistic reputations are to be salvaged in the age of disinformation, I believe an entirely new and open model of journalism must be created. It’s a model that will have to address the mispricing of credit at the heart of the trust issue in journalism. In order to work effectively, it will have to reorganize how information is distributed and valued across the internet. Only then can trust be rebuilt in the media system, and can journalism once again be turned into a force for positive-sum growth rather than division, polarization, and distrust.

In 2022, I hope to play a small role in bringing such a system about.

Izabella Kaminska is the outgoing editor of the Financial Times’ Alphaville blog.

Larry Ryckman

Laxmi Parthasarathy

j. Siguru Wahutu

Andrew Freedman

Parker Molloy

Anita Varma

Gabe Schneider

Brian Moritz

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Errin Haines

Meena Thiruvengadam

Mary Walter-Brown

Cindy Royal

Melody Kramer

Natalia Viana

Raney Aronson-Rath

Shalabh Upadhyay

Jim Friedlich

Richard Tofel

Jesse Holcomb

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Gonzalo del Peon

Joni Deutsch

Daniel Eilemberg

Tamar Charney

A.J. Bauer

Stephen Fowler

Megan McCarthy

Jessica Clark

Matt Karolian

Kerri Hoffman

Stefanie Murray

Wilson Liévano

Anika Anand

Burt Herman

Don Day

James Green

Chase Davis

Sarah Marshall

Jody Brannon

Paul Cheung

Mandy Jenkins

Sam Guzik

Joshua P. Darr

Kristen Jeffers

Cristina Tardáguila

Michael W. Wagner

Tony Baranowski

Jennifer Brandel

Amara Aguilar

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Izabella Kaminska

John Davidow

Nikki Usher

David Skok

Joe Amditis

Christoph Mergerson

Robert Hernandez

Julia Angwin

Amy Schmitz Weiss

David Cohn

Christina Shih

Mike Rispoli

Chicas Poderosas

S. Mitra Kalita

Rachel Glickhouse

Jennifer Coogan

Joanne McNeil

Gordon Crovitz

Eric Nuzum

Cherian George

Millie Tran

Matthew Pressman

Simon Galperin

Tom Trewinnard

An Xiao Mina

Moreno Cruz Osório

Simon Allison

Victor Pickard

Whitney Phillips

Zizi Papacharissi

Ariel Zirulnick

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Joy Mayer

Janelle Salanga

Alice Antheaume

Juleyka Lantigua

Sarah Stonbely

Julia Munslow

Matt DeRienzo

Mario García

Candace Amos

Kristen Muller

Jonas Kaiser

Catalina Albeanu

Ståle Grut

Anthony Nadler

Francesco Zaffarano

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Doris Truong