We remember the importance of face-to-face reporting

“It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.”

What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,

Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.

Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.

It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.

“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.

Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”

In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.

Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.

What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,

Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.

Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.

It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.

“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.

Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”

In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.

Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.

Meena Thiruvengadam

Mike Rispoli

Ståle Grut

Burt Herman

Chicas Poderosas

Tamar Charney

Daniel Eilemberg

Don Day

Julia Angwin

Joanne McNeil

Matt Karolian

Candace Amos

Jonas Kaiser

Natalia Viana

Larry Ryckman

Simon Allison

Cherian George

Kristen Jeffers

S. Mitra Kalita

Anika Anand

Stefanie Murray

Ariel Zirulnick

Simon Galperin

James Green

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Jennifer Brandel

Alice Antheaume

Whitney Phillips

Joe Amditis

Anita Varma

Megan McCarthy

Moreno Cruz Osório

Joy Mayer

Joni Deutsch

Victor Pickard

Michael W. Wagner

Jody Brannon

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Sam Guzik

Francesco Zaffarano

j. Siguru Wahutu

Cristina Tardáguila

John Davidow

A.J. Bauer

Raney Aronson-Rath

Zizi Papacharissi

Nikki Usher

Cindy Royal

Janelle Salanga

Sarah Marshall

Juleyka Lantigua

Jennifer Coogan

Stephen Fowler

David Skok

Wilson Liévano

Gabe Schneider

Christina Shih

Jim Friedlich

Errin Haines

Tony Baranowski

Kerri Hoffman

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Richard Tofel

Robert Hernandez

Jesse Holcomb

Anthony Nadler

Izabella Kaminska

An Xiao Mina

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Matthew Pressman

Kristen Muller

Catalina Albeanu

Andrew Freedman

Christoph Mergerson

Shalabh Upadhyay

Jessica Clark

Parker Molloy

Gonzalo del Peon

Mario García

Rachel Glickhouse

Sarah Stonbely

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Paul Cheung

Mary Walter-Brown

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Tom Trewinnard

Brian Moritz

Julia Munslow

Chase Davis

Millie Tran

David Cohn

Matt DeRienzo

Amara Aguilar

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Eric Nuzum

Mandy Jenkins

Gordon Crovitz

Doris Truong

Melody Kramer

Joshua P. Darr