What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
Simon Galperin
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Richard Tofel
David Skok
Nikki Usher
Stefanie Murray
Cindy Royal
S. Mitra Kalita
Mike Rispoli
Paul Cheung
Ariel Zirulnick
Megan McCarthy
Tony Baranowski
Joanne McNeil
Matthew Pressman
Gordon Crovitz
Errin Haines
Parker Molloy
Sam Guzik
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Victor Pickard
Jessica Clark
Kristen Muller
Mary Walter-Brown
Ståle Grut
Stephen Fowler
Gabe Schneider
Joy Mayer
Julia Munslow
Kristen Jeffers
Chicas Poderosas
Cherian George
Whitney Phillips
Amara Aguilar
Joshua P. Darr
Matt DeRienzo
Christina Shih
Simon Allison
Larry Ryckman
Burt Herman
Jennifer Coogan
Catalina Albeanu
Wilson Liévano
Christoph Mergerson
Alice Antheaume
Don Day
Gonzalo del Peon
Anthony Nadler
Tom Trewinnard
Jesse Holcomb
Kerri Hoffman
James Green
Sarah Stonbely
Brian Moritz
Rachel Glickhouse
AX Mina
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Anita Varma
Chase Davis
Robert Hernandez
Meena Thiruvengadam
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Andrew Freedman
Shalabh Upadhyay
Melody Kramer
Jim Friedlich
Mario García
John Davidow
Millie Tran
Anika Anand
Raney Aronson-Rath
Eric Nuzum
Joni Deutsch
Sarah Marshall
Natalia Viana
Daniel Eilemberg
Francesco Zaffarano
Cristina Tardáguila
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Jonas Kaiser
Tamar Charney
Jody Brannon
David Cohn
Julia Angwin
Michael W. Wagner
Juleyka Lantigua
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Mandy Jenkins
Jennifer Brandel
Joe Amditis
Matt Karolian
Izabella Kaminska
Zizi Papacharissi
Moreno Cruz Osório
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Janelle Salanga
Doris Truong
Candace Amos
A.J. Bauer
j. Siguru Wahutu