What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
Tamar Charney
Megan McCarthy
j. Siguru Wahutu
Jesse Holcomb
Julia Angwin
James Salanga
John Davidow
Ariel Zirulnick
Catalina Albeanu
Millie Tran
Joe Amditis
Kristen Jeffers
James Green
Sarah Marshall
Errin Haines
Gonzalo del Peon
Stephen Fowler
Burt Herman
Cindy Royal
Jonas Kaiser
Raney Aronson-Rath
Moreno Cruz Osório
Gabe Schneider
Kristen Muller
Juleyka Lantigua
Anika Anand
Joni Deutsch
Gordon Crovitz
Alice Antheaume
Andrew Freedman
Jim Friedlich
Matthew Pressman
AX Mina
Jennifer Coogan
Matt DeRienzo
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Tony Baranowski
Christoph Mergerson
Francesco Zaffarano
Tom Trewinnard
Mary Walter-Brown
Natalia Viana
Kendra Pierre-Louis
David Skok
Whitney Phillips
Meena Thiruvengadam
Sam Guzik
Mike Rispoli
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Cristina Tardáguila
Simon Galperin
Sarah Stonbely
Kerri Hoffman
Melody Kramer
Mario García
Matt Karolian
Christina Shih
Parker Molloy
Cherian George
Michael W. Wagner
S. Mitra Kalita
Anita Varma
Jessica Clark
Victor Pickard
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Julia Munslow
Anthony Nadler
Stefanie Murray
Joshua P. Darr
Don Day
Chicas Poderosas
Candace Amos
Ståle Grut
Joanne McNeil
A.J. Bauer
Izabella Kaminska
Paul Cheung
David Cohn
Mandy Jenkins
Zizi Papacharissi
Larry Ryckman
Richard Tofel
Brian Moritz
Joy Mayer
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Amara Aguilar
Wilson Liévano
Eric Nuzum
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Shalabh Upadhyay
Chase Davis
Daniel Eilemberg
Doris Truong
Robert Hernandez
Nik Usher
Simon Allison
Rachel Glickhouse
Jennifer Brandel
Jody Brannon