What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
Stephen Fowler
Mike Rispoli
Amara Aguilar
Tom Trewinnard
Tamar Charney
Chicas Poderosas
Gordon Crovitz
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Meena Thiruvengadam
Gabe Schneider
Joanne McNeil
Jennifer Coogan
Jim Friedlich
Kerri Hoffman
Wilson Liévano
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Nikki Usher
Andrew Freedman
Christoph Mergerson
S. Mitra Kalita
Eric Nuzum
j. Siguru Wahutu
Ståle Grut
Matthew Pressman
Mary Walter-Brown
Joshua P. Darr
Michael W. Wagner
Izabella Kaminska
Francesco Zaffarano
Melody Kramer
Zizi Papacharissi
Brian Moritz
Jessica Clark
Whitney Phillips
Natalia Viana
Cherian George
Victor Pickard
Burt Herman
Millie Tran
Don Day
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Sarah Marshall
Sam Guzik
David Skok
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Jonas Kaiser
Cindy Royal
Matt Karolian
Robert Hernandez
Doris Truong
Mandy Jenkins
Tony Baranowski
John Davidow
Christina Shih
Rachel Glickhouse
Megan McCarthy
Ariel Zirulnick
Juleyka Lantigua
Stefanie Murray
Raney Aronson-Rath
Kristen Jeffers
Sarah Stonbely
Anthony Nadler
Daniel Eilemberg
Moreno Cruz Osório
Joni Deutsch
Jennifer Brandel
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Candace Amos
James Green
Paul Cheung
Julia Angwin
Kristen Muller
Chase Davis
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Matt DeRienzo
Larry Ryckman
Julia Munslow
Anika Anand
An Xiao Mina
Simon Allison
David Cohn
Jody Brannon
Janelle Salanga
Errin Haines
Alice Antheaume
Anita Varma
Jesse Holcomb
Parker Molloy
Joe Amditis
Simon Galperin
Gonzalo del Peon
Catalina Albeanu
Cristina Tardáguila
A.J. Bauer
Shalabh Upadhyay
Joy Mayer
Richard Tofel
Mario García