What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,
Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.
Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.
It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.
“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.
Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”
In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.
Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.
Ståle Grut
Anita Varma
Izabella Kaminska
Simon Galperin
S. Mitra Kalita
Sam Guzik
Mike Rispoli
Larry Ryckman
James Green
Burt Herman
Richard Tofel
Millie Tran
Matt DeRienzo
Mandy Jenkins
Megan McCarthy
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Jennifer Coogan
Anthony Nadler
David Cohn
Meena Thiruvengadam
Mario García
Victor Pickard
Brian Moritz
Sarah Marshall
Kerri Hoffman
Tony Baranowski
Don Day
Moreno Cruz Osório
Joshua P. Darr
Shalabh Upadhyay
Zizi Papacharissi
Simon Allison
Cherian George
Michael W. Wagner
Mary Walter-Brown
Kristen Jeffers
Wilson Liévano
Jesse Holcomb
Christina Shih
Jody Brannon
Jennifer Brandel
Rachel Glickhouse
A.J. Bauer
Gordon Crovitz
Chicas Poderosas
Catalina Albeanu
Melody Kramer
Joni Deutsch
Francesco Zaffarano
Cindy Royal
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Ariel Zirulnick
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Parker Molloy
Julia Munslow
Joe Amditis
Christoph Mergerson
David Skok
Robert Hernandez
Raney Aronson-Rath
Chase Davis
Stefanie Murray
Janelle Salanga
Tom Trewinnard
Anika Anand
Nikki Usher
Stephen Fowler
Cristina Tardáguila
Paul Cheung
Gonzalo del Peon
Jonas Kaiser
Joy Mayer
John Davidow
Jessica Clark
Joanne McNeil
Matt Karolian
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Alice Antheaume
Sarah Stonbely
Amara Aguilar
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Jim Friedlich
Eric Nuzum
Andrew Freedman
Whitney Phillips
Gabe Schneider
Errin Haines
Kristen Muller
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Natalia Viana
Daniel Eilemberg
Tamar Charney
Juleyka Lantigua
AX Mina
Julia Angwin
j. Siguru Wahutu
Doris Truong
Matthew Pressman
Candace Amos