We remember the importance of face-to-face reporting

“It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.”

What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,

Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.

Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.

It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.

“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.

Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”

In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.

Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.

What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,

Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.

Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.

It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.

“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.

Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”

In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.

Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.

Sarah Marshall

Simon Allison

Moreno Cruz Osório

Paul Cheung

Zizi Papacharissi

Doris Truong

Andrew Freedman

Stephen Fowler

Errin Haines

Ariel Zirulnick

Tamar Charney

Gonzalo del Peon

Julia Munslow

Stefanie Murray

Simon Galperin

Joshua P. Darr

Matt Karolian

Sam Guzik

Jesse Holcomb

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Whitney Phillips

Joanne McNeil

Matthew Pressman

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Janelle Salanga

Kristen Jeffers

Eric Nuzum

Burt Herman

Gabe Schneider

Cindy Royal

Brian Moritz

Melody Kramer

Richard Tofel

Joy Mayer

John Davidow

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

David Skok

Jody Brannon

Jim Friedlich

Rachel Glickhouse

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Parker Molloy

Cherian George

Amara Aguilar

Victor Pickard

Ståle Grut

Shalabh Upadhyay

A.J. Bauer

Nikki Usher

Don Day

Tony Baranowski

Gordon Crovitz

Robert Hernandez

Joni Deutsch

Candace Amos

S. Mitra Kalita

Juleyka Lantigua

Anthony Nadler

Daniel Eilemberg

Julia Angwin

Mario García

Jennifer Coogan

Mary Walter-Brown

Anika Anand

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Catalina Albeanu

Jennifer Brandel

Christina Shih

Meena Thiruvengadam

Kristen Muller

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Matt DeRienzo

Cristina Tardáguila

Wilson Liévano

Jessica Clark

Izabella Kaminska

Natalia Viana

David Cohn

Christoph Mergerson

Jonas Kaiser

Tom Trewinnard

Joe Amditis

Francesco Zaffarano

Chicas Poderosas

Chase Davis

Sarah Stonbely

Mandy Jenkins

Kerri Hoffman

Larry Ryckman

Megan McCarthy

Mike Rispoli

Raney Aronson-Rath

j. Siguru Wahutu

James Green

Alice Antheaume

Michael W. Wagner

Millie Tran

An Xiao Mina

Anita Varma