We remember the importance of face-to-face reporting

“It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.”

What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,

Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.

Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.

It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.

“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.

Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”

In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.

Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.

What new digital disruption does 2022 have in store for journalists? This year is actually gearing up to have more of a vintage flavor. With the Covid crisis still fresh, the spotlight is turning back to the good old low-tech art of on-the-ground reporting,

Almost two years after a global health crisis forced newsrooms to improvise, coming back to the field and rekindling in-person interactions can be a challenge. Some reporters will tell you they’re feeling a little rusty. Others say it was easier to be protected by a screen when covering the world’s misery. Some will even admit that reporting from a sofa has its perks — and, in terms of comfort, definitely beats the uncertainty of meeting anonymous sources in the field.

Technology enables the production of more and more remote reporting — at a cheaper cost, from a business point of view. But there is a crucial need to get back to sources and events in the physical world. Only in real life is it possible to scrutinize the slightest signal without being limited by the time slot designated for a call. If you’re distracted by a source’s background on a Zoom call, you might notice what’s on their desk or happening in the corridor near them. Face-to-face reporting saves you from the burden of frozen Facetime images on a bad connection. It might let you glimpse that almost imperceptible frown on your source’s face when you ask a question.

It’s complicated to get to the truth. Getting to the bottom of an issue exclusively from a distance seems a nearly impossible task, even with the habit of a sedentary lifestyle imposed by curfews and lockdowns during Covid.

“When I was in Colombia to report the life and death of the socialist leader Maritza Quiroz Leyva, I had to check with no less than six sources, realizing that these six people could, at any time, give me six different versions,” recalls the French reporter Emilienne Malfatto. Margaux Benn, a journalist of dual French and Canadian nationality, had the same experience, where she had to consult 15 sources to check a piece of information.

Being online adds more complexity. There’s no hierarchy between people with no agenda, experts with an agenda, fake accounts, and so on. Hate, fakes, and data are one big mess; all sources are speaking at the same level and at the same time. To understand the facts behind a story on Instagram or TikTok, an organic exchange, an actual conversation, with all its in-person perks, as well as its annoyances, is essential. In a recent presentation to students at Sciences Po, Clarissa Ward, chief international correspondent at CNN, compared an interview to a dance. “You need to be in the moment to listen to what a person is telling you — it is a real engagement between two individuals, as opposed to a person reading a list of questions and doing their best impression of what listening looks like. Look at their body language and hear them.”

In 2022, as journalists strive to distinguish between sincere insights and questionable testimonies, getting back into the field is bound to come back into fashion.

Alice Antheaume is executive dean of the Sciences Po Journalism School in Paris.

Stephen Fowler

Kerri Hoffman

Richard Tofel

Stefanie Murray

Jim Friedlich

Janelle Salanga

Sarah Marshall

Melody Kramer

Matthew Pressman

Victor Pickard

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Burt Herman

Chase Davis

Joy Mayer

Tamar Charney

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

John Davidow

Jonas Kaiser

Eric Nuzum

Gabe Schneider

Juleyka Lantigua

Nikki Usher

James Green

Andrew Freedman

Christina Shih

Tony Baranowski

Simon Allison

Don Day

Parker Molloy

Chicas Poderosas

Cherian George

Natalia Viana

j. Siguru Wahutu

Ståle Grut

Alice Antheaume

Errin Haines

Brian Moritz

Joni Deutsch

Daniel Eilemberg

Amara Aguilar

A.J. Bauer

Jody Brannon

Cindy Royal

Paul Cheung

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Michael W. Wagner

Jesse Holcomb

Mike Rispoli

Millie Tran

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Julia Angwin

Gordon Crovitz

Jessica Clark

Kristen Jeffers

Zizi Papacharissi

Francesco Zaffarano

Wilson Liévano

Rachel Glickhouse

David Skok

Doris Truong

Mary Walter-Brown

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Simon Galperin

Matt DeRienzo

Cristina Tardáguila

Candace Amos

Whitney Phillips

Matt Karolian

Joanne McNeil

Jennifer Coogan

S. Mitra Kalita

Joshua P. Darr

Larry Ryckman

Tom Trewinnard

Anita Varma

Joe Amditis

Ariel Zirulnick

Mandy Jenkins

Anika Anand

Mario García

Shalabh Upadhyay

Kristen Muller

Moreno Cruz Osório

An Xiao Mina

Anthony Nadler

Izabella Kaminska

Raney Aronson-Rath

Sam Guzik

David Cohn

Megan McCarthy

Meena Thiruvengadam

Gonzalo del Peon

Sarah Stonbely

Christoph Mergerson

Catalina Albeanu

Jennifer Brandel

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Robert Hernandez

Jesenia De Moya Correa

Julia Munslow