Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.
Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.
Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.
Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.
The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.
An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.
Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.
Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.
Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.
The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.
But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.
It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.
This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?
I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.
To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.
Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.
Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.
Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.
Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.
Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.
The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.
An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.
Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.
Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.
Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.
The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.
But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.
It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.
This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?
I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.
To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.
Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.
Chase Davis
Jennifer Coogan
Kristen Muller
Errin Haines
Megan McCarthy
Francesco Zaffarano
Mario García
Zizi Papacharissi
Kendra Pierre-Louis
S. Mitra Kalita
Gonzalo del Peon
Matt Karolian
Simon Allison
Stephen Fowler
Andrew Freedman
Sam Guzik
Joanne McNeil
Catalina Albeanu
Raney Aronson-Rath
Jennifer Brandel
Tony Baranowski
Janelle Salanga
Shalabh Upadhyay
Paul Cheung
Joni Deutsch
Cindy Royal
Juleyka Lantigua
Joshua P. Darr
Julia Angwin
Gordon Crovitz
Meena Thiruvengadam
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Gabe Schneider
Daniel Eilemberg
Mandy Jenkins
Melody Kramer
Izabella Kaminska
Rachel Glickhouse
James Green
Wilson Liévano
David Skok
Whitney Phillips
Joy Mayer
Richard Tofel
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Anita Varma
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Anthony Nadler
Eric Nuzum
Alice Antheaume
Millie Tran
Burt Herman
Parker Molloy
Cristina Tardáguila
Christoph Mergerson
Moreno Cruz Osório
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Julia Munslow
Joe Amditis
David Cohn
Jesse Holcomb
Don Day
Nikki Usher
Natalia Viana
Mary Walter-Brown
Chicas Poderosas
Victor Pickard
Matthew Pressman
Doris Truong
Christina Shih
Amara Aguilar
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Larry Ryckman
Matt DeRienzo
Sarah Stonbely
A.J. Bauer
Ståle Grut
Kristen Jeffers
Candace Amos
AX Mina
John Davidow
Stefanie Murray
Sarah Marshall
Robert Hernandez
Jonas Kaiser
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Tom Trewinnard
Mike Rispoli
Simon Galperin
Ariel Zirulnick
Michael W. Wagner
Jody Brannon
Anika Anand
Jessica Clark
Cherian George
j. Siguru Wahutu
Tamar Charney
Brian Moritz
Jim Friedlich
Kerri Hoffman