Inverting the talent pipeline

“To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes.”

Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.

Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.

Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.

Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.

The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.

An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.

Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.

Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.

Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.

The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.

But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.

It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.

This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?

I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.

To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.

Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.

Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.

Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.

Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.

Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.

The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.

An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.

Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.

Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.

Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.

The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.

But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.

It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.

This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?

I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.

To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.

Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.

Candace Amos

Jessica Clark

Kathleen Searles & Rebekah Trumble

Mario García

Kerri Hoffman

Amy Schmitz Weiss

Matt DeRienzo

Julia Munslow

Matthew Pressman

David Skok

Jennifer Brandel

Millie Tran

Joni Deutsch

Francesco Zaffarano

Anika Anand

Meena Thiruvengadam

Mandy Jenkins

Cherian George

Eric Nuzum

Victor Pickard

Julia Angwin

Simon Allison

Catalina Albeanu

Christoph Mergerson

Christina Shih

Natalia Viana

An Xiao Mina

Moreno Cruz Osório

Jesenia De Moya Correa

John Davidow

Sam Guzik

j. Siguru Wahutu

Jim Friedlich

Errin Haines

Kendra Pierre-Louis

Sarah Stonbely

Matt Karolian

Stefanie Murray

Shalabh Upadhyay

Kristen Jeffers

Anita Varma

Raney Aronson-Rath

Jesse Holcomb

Michael W. Wagner

Gonzalo del Peon

Burt Herman

S. Mitra Kalita

Laxmi Parthasarathy

Sarah Marshall

Tony Baranowski

Joshua P. Darr

Rachel Glickhouse

Joe Amditis

Jody Brannon

Tom Trewinnard

Richard Tofel

Stephen Fowler

Robert Hernandez

A.J. Bauer

Janelle Salanga

Alice Antheaume

James Green

Joy Mayer

Joanne McNeil

Ståle Grut

Juleyka Lantigua

Chicas Poderosas

Brian Moritz

Izabella Kaminska

Doris Truong

Shannon McGregor & Carolyn Schmitt

Paul Cheung

Mike Rispoli

Nikki Usher

Zizi Papacharissi

Jonas Kaiser

Larry Ryckman

Cindy Royal

Andrew Freedman

Jennifer Coogan

Gordon Crovitz

David Cohn

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Amara Aguilar

Mary Walter-Brown

Parker Molloy

Gabe Schneider

Cristina Tardáguila

Chase Davis

Anthony Nadler

Daniel Eilemberg

Simon Galperin

Tamar Charney

Kristen Muller

Whitney Phillips

Wilson Liévano

Megan McCarthy

Melody Kramer

Ariel Zirulnick

Don Day