Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.
Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.
Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.
Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.
The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.
An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.
Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.
Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.
Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.
The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.
But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.
It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.
This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?
I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.
To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.
Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.
Opportunities for young journalists aren’t created equal, and U.S. media internships are fraught with inequity.
Internships have multiple barriers to entry. “Prestige” newsrooms usually require previous internship experience. That doesn’t necessarily account for comparable experience gained from student media, or even self-published work with an engaged audience. Students often produce their work with few resources beyond peers who might have a semester or two more experience. Yet they meet deadlines, break stories, and keep their communities informed.
Who can afford to take an internship? The deck is stacked against anyone who might not be able to move across the country for eight to 12 weeks of work, sometimes for pay that’s barely above minimum wage.
Some news organizations say they offer college credit. That’s a trap. It costs money to claim that college credit — so the internship isn’t just unpaid, it makes the student find cash for the privilege of a summer of unpaid labor.
The deck is also stacked against people who don’t have a solid foundation in journalism basics. Our industry has no pipeline for attracting people if they aren’t at a college or university.
An overwhelming majority of journalists have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared with one-third of American adults. Like attracts like, and this comes at the expense of our newsrooms not reflecting the communities we’re supposed to serve. We need more people of color in newsrooms — particularly in leadership positions — but we also need more military veterans and disabled journalists.
Instead of reinforcing a cycle that selects people who already have advantages, internships should focus on providing real-world journalism experience and career coaching. More can be done to ensure that people from a variety of backgrounds have equitable opportunities.
Cities with at least two news organizations will see the value in pooling resources to provide affordable — or free — housing for interns. Local news is best done by people embedded in the community. And a key skill for journalists is learning to quickly establish rapport with sources. So internships in an unfamiliar part of the country will broaden a young journalist’s horizons, offer them lessons to quickly learn what’s important to their short-term neighbors, and allow them to bring an outsider’s perspective to the newsroom.
Poynter adjunct Kathy Lu has an idea that would upend the system: allowing places with the most resources to train journalists who would then be poised for success in smaller markets.
The internship process is set up like sports franchises. Your local papers are the farm teams, and they nurture the talent — some of whom make it to the big leagues.
But that system was set up back when most newsrooms (and I’m mostly talking about newspapers) were flush with resources — offices that have a 20-person team now once had over 100 — and news deserts didn’t exist.
It was a system set up to eventually benefit the larger, dominant newsrooms (a colonialist move), who get to pay intern wages to hard-working reporters who have already had several summers of experience.
This isn’t to say people can’t have an ambition to work at these important institutions of record. It’s to ask: Why is the pipeline one-directional? Why aren’t the larger newsrooms with more resources also helping supply talent to the smaller ones? Why isn’t there a program to train journalists to become bad-ass reporters and writers for local media?
I absolutely love the idea of inverting the talent pipeline. It puts the organizations with the most resources — including an abundance of experienced journalists who can be mentors — in the position to nurture promising young journalists who will thrive because of the attention paid to their development in those crucial internship weeks.
To grow talent, news organizations need to invest in creating fertile ground for emerging journalists to do their best — and to make occasional mistakes. But those mistakes should not include entering the workforce underpaid and with a mountain of student loans.
Doris Truong is director of training and diversity at The Poynter Institute.
Chase Davis
Errin Haines
David Cohn
Tony Baranowski
Sam Guzik
Jody Brannon
Victor Pickard
Joanne McNeil
Anika Anand
Julia Angwin
Ståle Grut
An Xiao Mina
Paul Cheung
Gabe Schneider
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Robert Hernandez
Millie Tran
Cherian George
Eric Nuzum
Christina Shih
Jesse Holcomb
Daniel Eilemberg
Mike Rispoli
Francesco Zaffarano
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Jessica Clark
Joni Deutsch
Mario García
Mandy Jenkins
Stefanie Murray
Andrew Freedman
Melody Kramer
Tom Trewinnard
Simon Galperin
Brian Moritz
Parker Molloy
Juleyka Lantigua
Jennifer Coogan
Matt Karolian
Joshua P. Darr
Simon Allison
Sarah Stonbely
Nikki Usher
Janelle Salanga
Raney Aronson-Rath
Cindy Royal
Zizi Papacharissi
Anthony Nadler
Joe Amditis
Matt DeRienzo
Rachel Glickhouse
Izabella Kaminska
Julia Munslow
David Skok
j. Siguru Wahutu
Gordon Crovitz
Mary Walter-Brown
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Megan McCarthy
Shalabh Upadhyay
Cristina Tardáguila
Larry Ryckman
Whitney Phillips
John Davidow
Natalia Viana
Alice Antheaume
Moreno Cruz Osório
Anita Varma
Kristen Jeffers
Wilson Liévano
Candace Amos
Stephen Fowler
Kristen Muller
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Matthew Pressman
Jim Friedlich
Don Day
S. Mitra Kalita
Ariel Zirulnick
A.J. Bauer
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Kerri Hoffman
Amara Aguilar
Jonas Kaiser
Meena Thiruvengadam
Tamar Charney
Burt Herman
Christoph Mergerson
Michael W. Wagner
Sarah Marshall
Doris Truong
Gonzalo del Peon
Jennifer Brandel
Joy Mayer
Chicas Poderosas
James Green
Catalina Albeanu
Richard Tofel