Know what’s the worst part of being a podcast consultant? Everyone thinks they know what they’re doing.
Talented people and companies see the buzz around podcasting, want a piece of the action, and jump into the FOMO-fueled gold rush that’s built over the past seven years.
Legacy television, print, and radio news organizations fall into a predictable pattern: They look at podcasting and see a possible additional route forward through this era of disruption. They hire an executive producer, a head of audio, or some other impressive and official-sounding title (often someone with a track record as a creator, but zero experience as an executive or strategic leader), throw them a seemingly impressive headcount and budget, and then sit back and wait for their version of The Daily, Radiolab, or Serial to magically emerge from their new team.
Almost every major news organization has followed some version of the above, but how many are succeeding with this strategy? Almost none — and even those with some flashes of success aren’t doing it systematically or consistently.
For several years, a mixture of denial and deep optimism have kept up the facade. News outlet leaders believe that, since others are perceived to have success with podcasting, their payoff must be right around the corner. They see news of multimillion-dollar acquisitions and distribution deals, or derivative rights deals with major stars attached, and believe theirs will happen…soon.
But I believe that 2022 is going to be the year that changes. Remember all those pivots to video? The same thing will happen to podcasting: a lot of thrashing around meant to replace one magic-bullet podcasting strategy with another.
Some organizations will effectively exit podcasting; others will reboot; some will even double down and increase their investments. None of it will really make a difference unless they change one thing: They need to dump revenue-based metrics as their primary goals.
To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with revenue. Businesses exist to make a profit, and nonprofits exist to generate service without losing money. Revenue is necessary for both. But in the “you are what you measure” world, the worst way to achieve success in podcast revenue is to make revenue your primary goal.
The most important lesson I offer to companies about podcasting is that every single podcast that you’d deem “a success” became successful by focusing on audience building. People who will be successful in the future will be those who worry about using podcasting to build and deepen relationships, first and foremost.
A primary focus on revenue leads to a lot of problems, and then some stupid solutions to those problems, often trying to squeeze more out of an already underperforming portfolio, reducing investment, and making the whole thing a lot less fun for the company, creators, and the audience.
When you focus your primary goal on audience building, you create a number of problems, too. But those are great problems to have: How do I monetize all this listening? How do I manage collaboration and partnership opportunities? How do I set up subscription opportunities? How do I engage with all these people?
Most importantly, focusing on audience helps address the big mistake that almost every legacy media organization makes when they stand up a podcast group: They make big investments in production, but put almost no resources into ongoing audience engagement, social media, or other means to build a community around what they create.
Revenue comes from having an audience, so the key to revenue growth is audience growth. Focus on the audience and the money will follow.
This coming year, I believe a lot of bean-counters will look at what their legacy orgs are investing in podcasting, look at what return that investment is generating, and raise the flag that something needs to change. And they’ll be right.
But moments like this shouldn’t be feared. They are an opportunity to take stock, learn from early experiences, and reboot in a way that sets the podcast team up for success. If that happens, then Podcast Strategy 2.0 (or 3.0, or 6.0) will feel like a step forward toward an exciting future.
Eric Nuzum is cofounder of the production and creative consulting company Magnificent Noise.
Know what’s the worst part of being a podcast consultant? Everyone thinks they know what they’re doing.
Talented people and companies see the buzz around podcasting, want a piece of the action, and jump into the FOMO-fueled gold rush that’s built over the past seven years.
Legacy television, print, and radio news organizations fall into a predictable pattern: They look at podcasting and see a possible additional route forward through this era of disruption. They hire an executive producer, a head of audio, or some other impressive and official-sounding title (often someone with a track record as a creator, but zero experience as an executive or strategic leader), throw them a seemingly impressive headcount and budget, and then sit back and wait for their version of The Daily, Radiolab, or Serial to magically emerge from their new team.
Almost every major news organization has followed some version of the above, but how many are succeeding with this strategy? Almost none — and even those with some flashes of success aren’t doing it systematically or consistently.
For several years, a mixture of denial and deep optimism have kept up the facade. News outlet leaders believe that, since others are perceived to have success with podcasting, their payoff must be right around the corner. They see news of multimillion-dollar acquisitions and distribution deals, or derivative rights deals with major stars attached, and believe theirs will happen…soon.
But I believe that 2022 is going to be the year that changes. Remember all those pivots to video? The same thing will happen to podcasting: a lot of thrashing around meant to replace one magic-bullet podcasting strategy with another.
Some organizations will effectively exit podcasting; others will reboot; some will even double down and increase their investments. None of it will really make a difference unless they change one thing: They need to dump revenue-based metrics as their primary goals.
To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with revenue. Businesses exist to make a profit, and nonprofits exist to generate service without losing money. Revenue is necessary for both. But in the “you are what you measure” world, the worst way to achieve success in podcast revenue is to make revenue your primary goal.
The most important lesson I offer to companies about podcasting is that every single podcast that you’d deem “a success” became successful by focusing on audience building. People who will be successful in the future will be those who worry about using podcasting to build and deepen relationships, first and foremost.
A primary focus on revenue leads to a lot of problems, and then some stupid solutions to those problems, often trying to squeeze more out of an already underperforming portfolio, reducing investment, and making the whole thing a lot less fun for the company, creators, and the audience.
When you focus your primary goal on audience building, you create a number of problems, too. But those are great problems to have: How do I monetize all this listening? How do I manage collaboration and partnership opportunities? How do I set up subscription opportunities? How do I engage with all these people?
Most importantly, focusing on audience helps address the big mistake that almost every legacy media organization makes when they stand up a podcast group: They make big investments in production, but put almost no resources into ongoing audience engagement, social media, or other means to build a community around what they create.
Revenue comes from having an audience, so the key to revenue growth is audience growth. Focus on the audience and the money will follow.
This coming year, I believe a lot of bean-counters will look at what their legacy orgs are investing in podcasting, look at what return that investment is generating, and raise the flag that something needs to change. And they’ll be right.
But moments like this shouldn’t be feared. They are an opportunity to take stock, learn from early experiences, and reboot in a way that sets the podcast team up for success. If that happens, then Podcast Strategy 2.0 (or 3.0, or 6.0) will feel like a step forward toward an exciting future.
Eric Nuzum is cofounder of the production and creative consulting company Magnificent Noise.
Jim Friedlich
Raney Aronson-Rath
Simon Galperin
Sam Guzik
Don Day
Stephen Fowler
Cindy Royal
Kerri Hoffman
Mary Walter-Brown
Jonas Kaiser
Catalina Albeanu
Ståle Grut
Mario García
Julia Angwin
Izabella Kaminska
Janelle Salanga
Sarah Marshall
Matt Karolian
Natalia Viana
Paul Cheung
Simon Allison
David Cohn
Larry Ryckman
Rachel Glickhouse
Gabe Schneider
Amara Aguilar
Anika Anand
Joshua P. Darr
Richard Tofel
Gordon Crovitz
Joni Deutsch
Cherian George
Kristen Muller
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Shalabh Upadhyay
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Errin Haines
Cristina Tardáguila
Michael W. Wagner
Andrew Freedman
Kristen Jeffers
Victor Pickard
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Sarah Stonbely
Chase Davis
Megan McCarthy
Mandy Jenkins
Whitney Phillips
Eric Nuzum
Nikki Usher
Moreno Cruz Osório
Anita Varma
Juleyka Lantigua
Candace Amos
Jennifer Coogan
Robert Hernandez
Tony Baranowski
Daniel Eilemberg
j. Siguru Wahutu
John Davidow
Millie Tran
Burt Herman
Tom Trewinnard
Tamar Charney
Gonzalo del Peon
Anthony Nadler
Chicas Poderosas
Doris Truong
Joy Mayer
Melody Kramer
Jessica Clark
Mike Rispoli
David Skok
Francesco Zaffarano
James Green
Jody Brannon
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Jennifer Brandel
Brian Moritz
Christina Shih
Stefanie Murray
S. Mitra Kalita
Matt DeRienzo
Alice Antheaume
An Xiao Mina
Parker Molloy
Jesse Holcomb
Joe Amditis
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Matthew Pressman
Christoph Mergerson
Ariel Zirulnick
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Joanne McNeil
Julia Munslow
Meena Thiruvengadam
Zizi Papacharissi
Wilson Liévano
A.J. Bauer