2022 will be a make-or-break year for remote and flexible work in news, particularly in national and global newsrooms. This is the last chance to take what we’ve learned from the pandemic and implement long-term changes that can help these organizations become more inclusive and better places to work.
Next year, it seems likely newsrooms will finalize their plans for returning to office work. But it’s another question if news leaders will make the changes necessary to give their employees more flexibility in where and how they work — or if they’ll fall back into old habits and outdated management practices.
Even as many people continue to work from home, news organizations with correspondents around the country and the world still insist on hiring many positions to work out of offices, especially in New York and Washington. Bureaucracy and HR concerns are the likely culprits, but they’re also just excuses. After all, national news organizations like Vox Media, Forbes, and The 19th have figured out how to offer many fully remote positions.
There are valid reasons for news organizations to maintain the status quo. Newsrooms are great places for reporters and editors to collaborate. They offer opportunities for younger staffers to learn the trade, and they can be exciting, adrenaline-filled environments. But like offices in other industries, they won’t be the same after the pandemic, and they simply aren’t necessary for some kinds of jobs. Now’s the time to reimagine what newsrooms look like and make them better places to work.
Remote work can help chip away at some persistent problems in national media. More remote positions can allow for more desperately needed diverse hiring practices. Having staffers more widely dispersed throughout the country could improve how newsrooms think about and shape the news, and potentially cut down on parachute journalism. Hiring more remote workers could also push newsrooms to improve and formalize processes like mentorship and training.
That said, it’s not enough just to make certain positions remote-friendly and call it a day. In order to make remote work functional, newsrooms must actually enact policies for onboarding, stipends, mentorship, communication, and work culture, among other things. Also, establishing remote and flexible work policies must incorporate staff feedback.
All of this will take time and experimentation, and we should work together across the industry to share our knowledge as we figure out how to make this work. It will be worth it: Newsrooms that formalize meaningful remote and flexible work policies will likely become more competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
We’re now nearly two years into the pandemic; we have proof that news operations can function outside of offices. It’s past time for more newsrooms to come to terms with the future of remote work.
Rachel Glickhouse is a senior project manager at the (all-remote) News Revenue Hub.
2022 will be a make-or-break year for remote and flexible work in news, particularly in national and global newsrooms. This is the last chance to take what we’ve learned from the pandemic and implement long-term changes that can help these organizations become more inclusive and better places to work.
Next year, it seems likely newsrooms will finalize their plans for returning to office work. But it’s another question if news leaders will make the changes necessary to give their employees more flexibility in where and how they work — or if they’ll fall back into old habits and outdated management practices.
Even as many people continue to work from home, news organizations with correspondents around the country and the world still insist on hiring many positions to work out of offices, especially in New York and Washington. Bureaucracy and HR concerns are the likely culprits, but they’re also just excuses. After all, national news organizations like Vox Media, Forbes, and The 19th have figured out how to offer many fully remote positions.
There are valid reasons for news organizations to maintain the status quo. Newsrooms are great places for reporters and editors to collaborate. They offer opportunities for younger staffers to learn the trade, and they can be exciting, adrenaline-filled environments. But like offices in other industries, they won’t be the same after the pandemic, and they simply aren’t necessary for some kinds of jobs. Now’s the time to reimagine what newsrooms look like and make them better places to work.
Remote work can help chip away at some persistent problems in national media. More remote positions can allow for more desperately needed diverse hiring practices. Having staffers more widely dispersed throughout the country could improve how newsrooms think about and shape the news, and potentially cut down on parachute journalism. Hiring more remote workers could also push newsrooms to improve and formalize processes like mentorship and training.
That said, it’s not enough just to make certain positions remote-friendly and call it a day. In order to make remote work functional, newsrooms must actually enact policies for onboarding, stipends, mentorship, communication, and work culture, among other things. Also, establishing remote and flexible work policies must incorporate staff feedback.
All of this will take time and experimentation, and we should work together across the industry to share our knowledge as we figure out how to make this work. It will be worth it: Newsrooms that formalize meaningful remote and flexible work policies will likely become more competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
We’re now nearly two years into the pandemic; we have proof that news operations can function outside of offices. It’s past time for more newsrooms to come to terms with the future of remote work.
Rachel Glickhouse is a senior project manager at the (all-remote) News Revenue Hub.
Robert Hernandez
Gabe Schneider
j. Siguru Wahutu
Richard Tofel
Tony Baranowski
Victor Pickard
Julia Munslow
Don Day
Gonzalo del Peon
Kristen Muller
Jennifer Brandel
Janelle Salanga
Julia Angwin
Sam Guzik
Joanne McNeil
Izabella Kaminska
Christina Shih
Chicas Poderosas
Sarah Stonbely
Amy Schmitz Weiss
Larry Ryckman
Meena Thiruvengadam
Moreno Cruz Osório
Simon Allison
Andrew Freedman
Jesenia De Moya Correa
Parker Molloy
Zizi Papacharissi
Nikki Usher
Laxmi Parthasarathy
Shannon McGregor Carolyn Schmitt
Joe Amditis
Burt Herman
Simon Galperin
Matt Karolian
Cindy Royal
Matt DeRienzo
Michael W. Wagner
Joshua P. Darr
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Matthew Pressman
David Skok
Jesse Holcomb
Sarah Marshall
Catalina Albeanu
Jessica Clark
Joy Mayer
Daniel Eilemberg
A.J. Bauer
Megan McCarthy
Anita Varma
Mandy Jenkins
Melody Kramer
Mary Walter-Brown
Shalabh Upadhyay
Alice Antheaume
Cristina Tardáguila
Anika Anand
Stephen Fowler
Whitney Phillips
Jim Friedlich
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
Joni Deutsch
Millie Tran
Ariel Zirulnick
Doris Truong
Francesco Zaffarano
Eric Nuzum
Jennifer Coogan
Stefanie Murray
James Green
Kathleen Searles Rebekah Trumble
Wilson Liévano
Gordon Crovitz
Raney Aronson-Rath
Tom Trewinnard
Kerri Hoffman
Amara Aguilar
Tamar Charney
John Davidow
Rachel Glickhouse
Anthony Nadler
Chase Davis
Natalia Viana
Candace Amos
AX Mina
Christoph Mergerson
Mario García
Jonas Kaiser
David Cohn
Mike Rispoli
Errin Haines
Cherian George
Paul Cheung
Brian Moritz
Ståle Grut
Jody Brannon
S. Mitra Kalita
Juleyka Lantigua
Kristen Jeffers