Radically rethinking design

“2017 means rethinking every aspect of our designs: what they say, what they assume, and how they might better serve our audiences.”

In 2017, we will radically rethink our designs, and what they say, what they assume, and how they might better serve our audiences.

Let’s start with the headline. For example: Could an initial headline reflect visually that the story is evolving and contains incomplete information? Maybe a first report headline could look like this, with an empty outline?

k_emptymen

And then change in appearance to something like this, semi-filled, when we learn more information?

k_walk

And then change a third time when the story is complete?

k_plantflag

melody-kramerIn other words, how can we encode as much useful information as possible in a headline? Colors, fonts, shading, size, position, pictures, interactivity, history, metadata — basically all the design elements of information encoding across multiple dimensions. Which of those are most helpful to enhancing the headline? How can we test them?

For example, could we think of a headline as something that one can hover over, and immediately see source material? Or how many times the headline has changed? Or how other publications have written the same headline? (How does that help readers? How could that help publications?)

Let’s go broader. Why are headlines text? Could they be something else? What is the most important element at the top of a page? Is it five to fourteen words or is it something else entirely?

k_expletive

Could we have multiple headlines for the same piece? Maybe write one that reports verbatim what happened. Then one that interprets, particularly if what happens verbatim isn’t actually true. Then maybe one that sees what happens from a different point of view. Then one that uses a quote. Then one that uses numbers. Publish all of them alongside a story. (Other interesting existing examples: L.A. Times sharelines, WaPo’s Bandito, Bloomberg’s perpetual re-headlining and headline A/B testing, Optimizely and ChartBeat‘s headline A/B testing solutions, Naytev‘s social media multiple headline testing solution.) Are more dynamic, detailed, and numerous headlines on single articles effective ways for news organizations to distinguish themselves from generic fake news sites?

Could a headline be a comment? Could it be a visualization? What material does a reader need at the top of a page? Is it text? A push notification? Let’s pause there for a second. With newly designed headlines, translations to a push notification could get murky. Things like mouse-hover functionality won’t be accessible by mobile users.

We then have a constrained creativity problem, where constraints are embedded in various operating systems. It also suggests that headline writing may now span multiple jobs. Or maybe those all fall under one job, and it just means “headline writing” is now a bigger part of an editor’s job. And the skill set required is different.

Back to constraints within platforms limiting our creativity. Do we only think of mainly-text-based solutions because of the current nature of the platforms we share on? What if that changes? How could that change? A lot of current restrictions around headlines come from social and search restrictions and it would be interesting to think about that impact and how publications might bypass them with headline-like constructs (like Mic’s multimedia notifications or BuzzFeed’s emoji notifications.) They’re take the headline space and reworking it using images. What could we use besides images? In addition to images?

k_computer

Let’s think about this in terms of ads. Look at Facebook Ads. They localize headlines. Should news headlines be localized? What does that feel like?

What other kinds of information could be contained in the space that we currently call “headline”?

How might this help readers?

Now let’s repeat this experiment for first paragraphs, bylines, right rails, left rails, comment sections, landing pages, mastheads, verticals, investigative stories, push notifications, style section stories, homepages, metadata, what you measure, how you measure, and every other bit on your site. 2017 means rethinking every aspect of our designs: what they say, what they assume, and how they might better serve our audiences.

Thank you to Matt Crespi and Aram Zucker-Scharff for thinking through some of these ideas with me.

Melody Joy Kramer leads audience growth and development for the Wikimedia Foundation. Lisa Romero, whose work appears throughout this piece, is an illustrator based in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

Richard J. Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Errin Haines Whack   Chaos or community?

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Mario Garcia   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

Trushar Barot   API or die

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Andy Rossback   The year of the user