In 2017, the press will have to confront a president and a public that are dangerously hostile to it.
President Obama has not been a friend to national security journalists. His administration has used grand jury subpoenas to force reporters to reveal their confidential sources. And it’s used the Espionage Act, a vague 1917 law that criminalizes sharing sensitive national security info, to jail reporters’ sources.
But Obama at least paid lip service to the importance of press freedom. He held regular press conferences, sat down with reporters for one-on-one interviews, and publicly praised investigative journalism.
Compare that to the president-elect. Trump made insulting journalists a staple of his campaign rallies, threatened to sue news organizations for reporting true stories that were critical of him, and refused to issue press credentials to reporters who had written things that he did not like.
Combine the Obama administration’s legal precedent with Trump’s disdain for the press and you’ve got a dangerous mix.
Trump and his choice for attorney general, Jeff Sessions, will likely to increase the number of subpoenas and leak prosecutions. They might even go a step further and try to indict reporters under the Espionage Act. Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s former campaign manager, has already said that New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet “should be in jail.”
Such heavy-handed repression of journalists might inspire public outcry against Trump. Or it might not. Right now, much of the public shares the president-elect’s disdain for journalists.
A nasty, polarized campaign filled with competing charges of media bias has soured the press in the eyes of many people on both left and right. These people won’t stop reading and watching mainstream news sources, but they will have less trust in them. That will make it harder for mainstream journalists to win sympathy if Trump tries to crush them.
It will also make it tougher to debunk conspiracy theories spread by fake news sites. Someone might read The New York Times, but that doesn’t mean they’ll trust the Times when the paper debunks conspiracy theories or fact-checks politicians.
It’s not enough for people to read the news. They have to trust it.
Public distrust of the press will also make it easier for celebrities and billionaires to silence media companies that they don’t like. The Supreme Court’s 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan made it difficult for public figures to win libel cases against journalists. Even when a jury finds in favor of a public figure, those verdicts are usually reversed on appeal. But plaintiffs don’t have to win cases in order to make life difficult for media companies. Legal bills aren’t cheap. A sufficiently motivated billionaire can easily fund enough frivolous lawsuits to bankrupt a small media organization.
Invasion-of-privacy suits are even more dangerous for news organizations, since truth isn’t a defense. Journalists can publish accurate stories and still be found liable for invading someone’s privacy. A jury that identifies more with celebrities than journalists is less likely to accept high-minded First Amendment arguments about newsworthiness and the public’s right to know.
In 2017, journalists will face attacks on all fronts. They’ll need to defend their First Amendment rights in court while keeping the public informed about the Trump’s administration’s activities. They’ll need to remind the American people why a free press is important.
Peter Sterne covers media for Politico.
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
An Xiao Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
David Weigel A test for online speech
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health