The internet has been around long enough for audiences to expect a personal connection with the media they interact with. Many columnists and news personalities have quickly adapted to these new expectations. But news organizations have struggled to adequately capture and incorporate audience feedback at scale. Consider how readers, viewers, and listeners have historically had limited avenues for sharing their feedback through inbound methods like letters to the editor, customer support calls and @ replies.
Now more news brands like the BBC, BuzzFeed, and ProPublica are being proactive in learning about audiences’ experiences and unmet needs through user research experiments. Product and business people at companies like Facebook and Spotify are already finding major value in these audience insights approaches, and it will benefit more publishers to do the same.
User research is about becoming fascinated with your audiences, through tools including interviews, surveys, observation, usability testing, and co-design techniques. As a consumer subscription-first business, engaged regular readership is critical for The New York Times. We use user research to understand our audience members’ lives and what we can best offer them: news, analysis, entertainment, and even offerings that haven’t previously existed.
It’s helped us empathize with and design for people who want to get caught up on a breaking-news event 36 hours in; travelers who want to access recommendations for a city when they’re offline abroad; and presidential voters who want quick context on topics mid-debate. My colleagues also use these approaches for new product and international projects, among others.
My prediction — indeed, my hope — is that improvements informed by user insights can help offer financial stability for media organizations. How? Existing audiences who feel that their experiences are seriously considered are more likely to remain engaged and, where relevant, pay to subscribe. Second, digital and print story experiences that put users at the center have more deeply engaged audiences and are shared more often.
Imagine a near future in which editors across organizations will improve news experiences and story presentations by pairing qualitative intel with data analytics. This intelligence currently mostly informs tactical changes (such as specific stories and forms), but soon I think it will be used as background for more strategic changes (what areas to cover and how).
Listening to your audiences can start small. When Monica Guzman was a reporter at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, she held a regular call for readers to join her after work at a local coffeeshop to tell her what was on their minds and to learn about their news interactions. The effort was less about soliciting story ideas and more about really hearing from and connecting with readers. This inquisitiveness coupled with research best practices is a powerful pair — and one that journalism and design are uniquely well positioned to pull off with some resource investment.
Know that the opportunity to understand consumers’ behaviors and attitudes isn’t intended to override editorial judgment or dictate choices to appease upset readers. Instead, it offers powerful guidance that can inform designs and decision-making, next year and beyond.
I remain optimistic for the journalism business. As more people around the world get internet access, the need for high quality, trustworthy, without-fear-or-favor style journalism will grow. And it’s on us to understand how to provide that journalism in the best ways possible.
Emily Goligoski is a user experience research lead for The New York Times newsroom.
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
David Weigel A test for online speech
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
An Xiao Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention