To VR or not to VR — is that the question? Thanks to cheap and accessible technology, almost everyone is planning their first 360° video shoot and VR project. But is it really for everyone — and everything — every time?
Over the past few years, the story of journalistic innovation has repeated itself: a new medium, function, or technology appears, and we experiment willingly. VR and 360° video are no different. Google, Facebook and Samsung are all big technology companies pushing it as the next big thing; media companies are enticed to supply their technology with the needed content. The New York Times is now producing a new 360° video every single day in partnership with Samsung.
But just because technology allows your audience to feel like the drinking fountain that Ai Weiwei drinks from — as demonstrated in one of their latest videos — should you do it? Remember that having a 360° camera can give you 359 more ways of making mistakes.
As Mike Isaac points out, technological innovation is often low risk for the tech companies, but a huge risk for publishers. Yet we act as if our lives depend on it. Just replace the technology, and what David Carr famously said upon receiving the first iPad in 2010 is just as apt for VR as we enter 2017: “Is that our bridge to the future? Or, oh wait, it’s a gallows!”
Let’s be honest: VR and 360° video are delightfully tricky. And as we all try to master this new medium, some obvious weaknesses have been uncovered, both in the medium and in us. Is it a waste of our time? What does it really take to make good VR?
After spending countless hours of watching VR and 360° content the last years, it strikes me that too many journalistic endeavors lack the key ingredients of good stories and good storytelling — which is quite an amazing feat for a profession built around the two.
With VR, we need to abandon almost everything we know about traditional media production. This is like video games. Or theatre. You’re now an audio guide at a museum, or Gyro Gearloose’s little helper.
We should use VR and 360° video as an opportunity to return to the core of our business: telling stories that need to be told, and showing places where they unfold in meaningful ways for more people.
It was only last year, when I vicariously joined Alexander Marquardt of ABC News in Syria, that I was convinced this technology could be worthwhile as a tool for journalism.
Ever since, I’ve been chasing a high that seems almost impossible to obtain again. One of the few contenders this year was Ben Solomon and The New York Times’ experience from the front lines in Iraq. It gave me a similar feeling of presence and understanding of the situation.
That initial rush to dive into VR now verges on parody. As more low-quality experiments are created and distributed to the public, the medium loses its power and the media loses its credibility. The story is lost when technology has taken its place.
That is why I would encourage more journalists and media organizations to take a look at how the BBC is approaching VR and 360° experiences. There’s a lot to learn, not just from their final products, but also in their underlying thinking.
Experiencing the story has been at the core of the BBC’s use of VR. They stress presence as a key to success. If you are in a forest, it’s about the wind in the trees, the cracking branches, and the trickling water.
This is not something you watch on TV; it’s something you experience. Something you remember happening to you. As a tool for journalism, to explain situations, stories and places, it could be second to none.
In my opinion, the BBC is far ahead of others here, despite only having released a small number of VR experiences and 360° videos to the public.
One reason is that they started out scrapping two out of three projects. As they went through the steps of figuring out the strengths of the medium before they released anything, the audience only got to see the products that had the requisite quality. With the bar already set high, and the likes of Facebook having hundreds of developers working on raising it higher, it’s time to acknowledge that your audience does not need to see your every stumble on the way to virtual reality greatness.
Notice the basic environment when Sir David Attenborough (who else?) makes you acquainted with a giant dinosaur. But make no mistake: It’s a high quality production with a lot of preparation, RED cameras, and a big crew.
Be sure you read up on their eight tips on producing VR before setting out to do it yourself next year.
They will also let you join refugees aboard a liferaft trying to cross the Mediterranean, in a similar fashion to what Planned Parenthood did when they allowed you to experience a journey to one of its clinics. Experiences like this actually embody the emotional capabilities of the new medium. Another fine example from the cold north is a 360° film on bullying from the Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company.
Thanks to newly found audio tapes, the BBC built a historic VR documentary around a soldier’s recollection of the Easter rebellion in Ireland. You play his part; the essence is that you being present is amplifying your understanding of a subject or a situation — just as Nonny de la Peña has recreated nonfiction narratives in VR for years.
For what its worth: The push from the technology companies will not make 2017 the year of VR, either. VR and 360° video will only go mainstream when people are starting to have great experiences and start to talk to each other about them. That is where journalism should play a pivotal role.
Ståle Grut is the acting editor of the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation’s R&D-lab, NRKbeta.
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
David Weigel A test for online speech
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Carrie Brown We won’t do enough
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers