2017 will be the year that news organizations start approaching headlines with the importance they deserve.
A few years ago, around the time that a scary-exciting new thing called “social” started becoming more important than search engine optimization, digital media organizations discovered that nothing mattered more than headlines, at least when it came to getting stories effectively distributed by social media. Organizations like Upworthy and ViralNova embraced aggressive A/B testing and often wound up with hilarious curiosity-gap headlines, but the bigger lesson was deeper: Putting aside whether or not the curiosity gap worked, the first measure of any headline was how effective it was at driving traffic.
That lesson spread, almost by osmosis, throughout the digital media sphere, and we’ve now reached the point at which the amount of time and effort put into “packaging” a story can significantly exceed the amount of time and effort that went into writing it in the first place. And that’s at old-fashioned news organizations which write the story before they have a headline for it. At many digital outlets, you don’t even bother starting to write unless and until there’s a good catchy headline you’re writing to.
What precious few media organizations ever worried about, however, was the fact that even with the best-crafted headline in the world, for every person who clicks on it, there are hundreds, if not thousands, who see it, digest it, and simply move on. People get their news from headlines now in a way they never did in the past, just because they see so many of those headlines on Twitter and Facebook.
Which means that, for any remotely serious news organization, the amount of traffic that a story drives has to be less important than the message that headline imparts, when it’s divorced from the article it sits atop. In 2017, it will be clearly inadequate to excuse a bad headline on the grounds that anybody who hasn’t read the full 4,500-word story is unqualified to pass judgment. Even people who get their news from individual news organizations’ apps find themselves scrolling through headlines these days at a rate which would have been unthinkable in the age of print. Getting news from headlines is entirely legitimate, and journalists can no longer hide behind the age-old “I didn’t write the headline” excuse.
In practice, this is going to mean that the purview of headlines needs to be wrested back from social-optimization teams. Instead, the people who know the story best — including the people who actually wrote the thing — have to be empowered to veto all headlines which are in any way misleading. Which, yes, would include using “populist” as a euphemism for racist.
More generally, journalists are going to start accepting a few more degrees of humility when it comes to understanding how their meticulously reported and fact-checked stories are consumed in the real world. Because most of the time, it turns out, they aren’t read at all. Instead, it’s just the headline which gets shared and shared again, by people who never bothered to click on the story. Which means that in 2017, more than ever, it’s going to be the headline which really matters.
Felix Salmon is a senior editor at Fusion.
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
An Xiao Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
David Weigel A test for online speech
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism