In September, eight weeks before the election, Gallup reported that trust in the nation’s news media has reached the lowest point since they began asking this question 44 years ago. The decline in trust, Gallup noted, has been more or less steady since 2005, although it greatly accelerated in 2016.
Since the election, journalists have been engaged in almost nonstop handwringing about the collapse in trust. To be candid, most seem astonished — but also almost affronted — that so much of the electorate chose Donald Trump after the avalanche of negative coverage he received. Surely, they seem to think, if the voters trusted us, they wouldn’t have voted for this man.
But there is another set of numbers worth considering as well. Here are a few examples: 20 percent of Trump voters, the exit polls report, had an unfavorable view of him. That’s 12 million people voting for a man they didn’t like. Fully 57 percent of white voters did not consider Trump honest or trustworthy. In other words, the explanation for the election result likely turned not so much on views of Trump, but on how broken many Americans believe our system to be, and on how desperate they are somehow to change it. (Also, on what many think of Hillary Clinton.)
And while many Americans are currently giving the president-elect the benefit of any doubts since his election, more are not. In eight polls taken since the election, Trump’s average of favorable views minus negative views is negative 4 percent. Bill Clinton, who was first elected with a smaller share of the popular vote than Trump (albeit in a three-candidate race), had net approval ratings around positive 30 percent at this point in 1992. Barack Obama, whose share of the popular vote was about seven points higher than Trump’s, had net approval ratings around positive 40 percent in 2008. In a survey taken in early December, 65 percent of respondents said they considered Trump to be “reckless.”
Justice Potter Stewart, in discussing Supreme Court rulings favorable to the press, once rhetorically asked a group of journalists, “Where do you think these rights came from? The stork didn’t bring them!” Similarly, where did voters get these views, and where are the people getting their negative impressions of their new leader?
They are getting them from the same press they say they do not trust.
I do not mean to minimize the problem of the trust gap: It is real, and it has important implications. Cable television, in particular, did a disgraceful job covering the campaign. Moreover, the trust gap is at least in part the result of a concerted campaign by Trump and others who share his politics, quite possibly aided and abetted by the Russian government, to undermine confidence in American journalism. This presents a serious threat in 2017, and likely beyond that.
But while concerned about trust, we need also to recognize that our fellow citizens are still listening to us as journalists, still reading, still watching, still learning from us — and that we need to redouble our own efforts to listen, and to learn from them.
The year ahead promises a time of well-reasoned fear for those of us in the news business. But fear should not give way to despair, nor should it cause us to soft-pedal the truth about our next president and his new administration.
Democratic governance in the United States is premised in part on the notion that if the people are kept informed by a vigorous press, they will ultimately choose wisely from among potential leaders. But such faith in long-term outcomes does not, and should not be taken to mean that all electoral judgments will be deemed wise by history. James Buchanan, Warren Harding, and Richard Nixon (twice) were all elected president.
Beyond that, while everyone prefers to be liked, admired, trusted, being liked is not our job as journalists.
Instead, that job, in the year ahead, is to continue to tell the truth about President Trump and all that comes with him, and to do this with special vigor when and if he challenges limits set by the Constitution. It is also to keep faith with the American people, believing that if we continue to listen to and inform them, they will, collectively, bring the country through, and perhaps even, thereby, have their own trust in the press somewhat restored.
Richard J. Tofel is president of ProPublica.
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
David Weigel A test for online speech
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom