For over a decade, digital publishers have been wrestling with an existential strategic question: Should we pursue consumer or advertising revenue as our primary revenue stream? In 2017, that question, and the tradeoff it implies, will become obsolete by the widespread adoption of machine-learning, predictive, and anticipatory analytics. In creating a dynamic meter among publishers, their readers, and their advertisers, these algorithms have the potential to transform how the publishing industry generates revenue.
One exciting side effect of building a dynamic meter is that it puts the entire organization’s emphasis on each individual story. If the story isn’t of high journalistic or engagement value, then it becomes much harder to build a business model around it. This moves publishers away from the all-or-nothing pursuit of scale at the expense of depth for advertising models, or loyalty at the expense of reach for consumer revenue models. Each article has to stand on its own. This changes dramatically the calculation that reporters and editors make in determining whether to cover a story.
All of it makes the notion of having binary on-or-off paywalls and press releases touting “10 free articles a month” seem antiquated.
Most publishers still identify their articles through the traditional tagging mechanisms of People, Places, and Topics. While these tags are helpful for categorizing the “what” of our journalism, they are unsophisticated tools for categorizing the “why” of our journalism. For example, when we tag a story as People: Donald Trump, Places: Washington, D.C., and Topic: Politics, we now know how we can present that article to our reader — but we don’t know why that story exists.
By mining the text in the article using natural language processing and seeking out complex patterns, machine-learning tools like IBM’s Alchemy API can go deeper in describing the emotional drivers of that story. Perhaps the article is really about a reader feeling outrage, or about feeling like the underdog. So while it may seem at first glance to be another story about the Trump transition team, by applying machine learning to that article, it may reveal that the story has more in common with a sports underdog story about Cleveland’s baseball team.
It’s the Kurt Vonnegut theory of storytelling, that every story follows a consistent emotional pattern — come to life on every article.
Once able to identify the emotional response expressed by a reader on individual articles, publishers can then begin to understand reader patterns and how eliciting specific emotions could create measurable value for each unique visitor.
Predictive analytics have the potential to increase revenue for publishers on an article basis while reducing overall cost-per-acquisition. Analytics can also help better convert visitors to subscribers, and most importantly, increase readers’ satisfaction.
Imagine a reader browsing the web on their smartphone while on a train heading into work. They click on a link through Reddit and arrive on your news site where they are served a paywall. Using predictive analytics, we are quite certain that this Reddit mobile reader will not subscribe to your website. In fact, the reader may even post on Reddit just how much she despises your paywall. So, instead of wasting our time trying to get that reader to subscribe, what other kinds of value can you exchange with her that could be of mutual benefit? Perhaps it’s an email newsletter signup form that could begin an inbound marketing relationship? Perhaps it’s a video preroll ad with a high CPM to generate maximum ad revenue? Perhaps it’s a prompt for the reader to “like” you on Facebook so that they can help expand your reach?
By looking at the data provided by past readers, publishers can predict what the ideal value exchange and conversion rate would be for any visitor arriving on any individual article from any referrer, any platform, at any time of day and then serve them a dynamic meter accordingly. Yes, achieving this will require an investment in data analysts, but there are already third-party tools on the market that could reduce the cost of implementation.
Predictive analytics have one fundamental flaw: They’re only based on historical data. By learning on the fly, anticipatory analytics are able to adapt in real-time to the conditions surrounding an article.
Remember that Reddit reader whose historical data suggests is unlikely to subscribe? Well, what if the article she is clicking on was an exclusive investigation directly related to Reddit itself? What if the article was just beginning to gain traction in the digital platform ecosystem but it wasn’t yet being picked up by other news outlets? Would that Reddit reader be more likely to subscribe then?
Anticipatory analytics allow publishers to make value-exchange decisions in real time on each article. If they wished, this could allow them to wall-off an article for subscribers only for the precise amount of time when it is of greatest value, and then, “open it back up” when the value of an ad impression surpasses the value of potential subscription revenue.
Now that we understand how machine learning can identify emotional drivers within stories, how predictive analytics can identify the value exchange between publishers and their individual readers, and how anticipatory analytics can adjust the maximum value exchange on the fly, we can begin to envision how combining all three could become the holy grail for publishers.
For advertisers, a publisher can identify that an article eliciting hope generates higher interest from a Facebook visitor than an article eliciting fear. Knowing hope results in greater advertiser satisfaction when their brand is placed next to those stories, publishers can raise the price of placing an advertisement next to that piece of journalism or insert a relevant piece of sponsored content in that article, while the story is being amplified and accelerating in interest.
From a subscription standpoint, a publisher can adjust paywalls according to a visitor’s likelihood of subscribing. For example, if one identifies that articles eliciting anger generate higher interest from a desktop homepage visitor than those eliciting sympathy and that this anger results in a higher subscription conversion rate while the story is amplifying in interest, you could put a hard wall around that article for that unique moment of time.
None of these scenarios are mutually exclusive. We can combine machine learning, predictive, and anticipatory analytics to optimize the value exchanged from this reader, on this device, coming from this platform, on this article, at this exact moment in time. In other words, a dynamic meter.
What could prevent this prediction from coming true is not technology, but organizational culture. The technology needed to pursue the dynamic meter already exists. The challenges of implementation are less technical and more cultural, as they would require publishers to collaborate across departments. In order to maximize overall revenues, publishers may have to do so at the expense of revenues in one department’s P&L or another. It also requires a serious investment in analytics, product, and technology at a time when budgets continue to shrink in newsrooms across North America. Finally, it requires publishers unifying around the common goal of putting their readers, and their stories, and not their own self-interest, first.
If collaboration, investment, and philosophy can align, then 2017 may be the year when a sophisticated, data-driven approach to revenue comes to fruition, and a dynamic value exchange among readers, the advertisers, and publishers, can be achieved.
David Skok is associate editor and head of digital editorial strategy at The Toronto Star.
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
David Weigel A test for online speech
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid