Journalism is community-as-a-service

“Sure, Facebook’s standardized display and positioning of content doesn’t help users make informed choices, but journalism can’t shirk responsibility for cheapening the product offering.”

News organizations are reeling. The 2016 election upended a lot of our ideas about our work — most disturbingly that reported, factual journalism is valued and trusted less than a cheap, clumsy imitation of itself. But the problem isn’t Macedonian teens or the fake news that made them rich. The problem is that we’ve forgotten what media businesses actually are. And 2017 brings a challenge and an opportunity to correct that mistake.

rebekah-monsonTo borrow a popular framework from the tech industry, media companies are and always have been community-as-a-service businesses. It’s time we start acting like it again.

At the peak of mass media consolidation, media had the luxury of operating as a widget business. In oligopolies, media could easily sell an exclusive inventory of ad units and fill the spaces around them with journalism (or crosswords, horoscopes, comics, newscasts, sitcoms, etc.). In a market of limited competition and inaccurate measures, we were allowed to forget that our primary value is actually contingent on a community trusting and acting on what we publish.

It’s not hard to trace how we got here. Media businesses have lost their distribution advantage to giant aggregators. They’ve met that upheaval with a frantic push for increased inventory, churning out content packed with more and more ads that annoy the hell out of users. Media companies have simultaneously slashed the journalism workforce to sweeten their balance sheets. The simplest economic forces at play in these two decisions predict a rapid decline in overall quality as quantity increases.

Journalists have also rediscovered that attention and engagement for identity-driven coverage far outpaces “objective” models of news that we built up during consolidation. Personality and identity have been huge brand differentiators in news businesses since they were invented in the 17th century. Within the infinite content supply of the news feed, people reliably gravitate toward the ease and emotional magnetism of identity politics rather than fact-based formats of modern journalism. And so news editors quite logically make more of the former and figure out ways to “spice up” the latter so that it might compete for attention.

These decisions have resulted in a proliferation of content from journalism brands that many people could easily confuse with or purposefully substitute with “fake news.” Sure, Facebook’s standardized display and positioning of content doesn’t help users make informed choices, but journalism can’t shirk responsibility for cheapening the product offering.

Journalism businesses must shift away from thinking that our solution is to build more, cheaper content to create more, cheaper ad inventory. Media’s own measures of business value reflect how wrong this idea is. One-off anonymous views are far cheaper than the sustained attention of those whom we understand and who trust us. And as CPMs shrink in the age of “peak content,” media businesses are cultivating revenue streams beyond display ads — including premium subscriptions, membership models, newsletters, and events — all of which rely on the value proposition of access to and meaningful information for specific, engaged communities.

Media have advantages in this effort. Journalists are pretty damn good at making authentic, impactful, and important stories. They’ve always built products that help people create, share, and unite around ideas. Some companies even have significant scale. It’s time to leverage these tools and recenter around the highest value proposition we have: engaged communities.

Great communities run on trust, and journalism’s top priority now must be building trust. Trust is a competitive advantage media has taken for granted and allowed to wither through a false assumption that market dominance indicated trust. Media literacy has eroded. Circulation and appointment viewing have declined. Scholars have long argued that “the view from nowhere” is hurting media. Here’s the proof: Users aren’t buying claims of objectivity. And a push toward niche content and niche products and an increasing reliance on social media as a vehicle for targeted distribution demonstrate that journalism isn’t really buying objectivity either. So, how do we set the next standard for trust?

We can start with radical transparency. Our communities don’t actually understand our businesses (neither do most of us, to be fair), and the lack of clarity leads to mistrust. At WhereBy.Us, our journalists in Miami and Seattle have been working on clarifying our business practices for users, laying out specifics about how we make money, who makes what, and how we present what we make. We’re seeking feedback from our community about these distinctions and how we might improve upon our practices. This isn’t a one-off project, but the start of an ongoing conversation, one that we consider deeply important as we experiment with new revenue models. We’ve all avoided the uncomfortable conversation too long, and now we have to talk about the business to build community trust.

Journalists can actively include users in our work, seeking input often, responding to that input promptly, and bringing them along to experience journalism first-hand. The belief that our own news judgment is more valuable than the questions of our communities is both paternalistic and out of sync with the many-to-many ethos of modern communication. Products like Hearken and The Coral Project are built to facilitate and organize this work and demonstrate that this effort pays off in increased engagement and strengthened brand relationships. And if media literacy is a problem in our communities, we have to find a solution.

The days of “don’t read the comments” are absolutely dead. If community is our core value, we don’t get the luxury of checking out and being dismissive when our community is unhealthy. Rather, journalists must be responsible hosts, actively engaging, listening and questioning the community to nurture its value. Journalists must seek to elevate the community, serving as a true platform of ideas rather than a command-and-control distribution force for facts we deem interesting.

Building community and learning to serve it allows media businesses to deliver more business value. Editorial employees are always growing their content and community expertise. The rise of product teams designed to scale the “Chinese wall” of our business models can and should leverage that expertise to help fuel the creation of new revenue opportunities.

For years, we’ve thought of reinventing journalism as a question of technology. We’ve considered this reinvention as a problem of scale, which we’ve often built at the expense of a deeply invested community. But we failed to see the human side of our problem. Every failure is also a challenge. Our communities are our true value, and now is the time to invest in them.

Rebekah Monson is co­founder and vice president of product of WhereBy.Us.

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

Errin Haines   Chaos or community?

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

Andy Rossback   The year of the user

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

Trushar Barot   API or die

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Mario García   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

Richard Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story