For those of us in journalism, media, and political communication who’ve spent the last decade touting the democratic possibilities of digital technologies, 2016 has been a tough year.
Critical of the dangers of the consolidation of media ownership, we’ve railed against the powerful, centralized gatekeepers of the past. We’ve scoffed at early-20th-century writings by Lippmann, Bernays, and others and their patronizing way they referred to the masses needing to be instructed, guided, or molded.
We’ve cheered for the citizen empowerment that would accompany the downstream migration of control away from concentrated power-holders into the hands of citizens, consumers, and audiences.
We’ve celebrated the foresight of elected officials who, in the 1980s, understood the democratic potential of digital technologies and made a case for funding their development.
We’ve pointed to Web 2.0 as the ultimate realization of the potential of digital technologies to empower individuals to create, talk back, connect, share, and disseminate original unfiltered content.
But in our optimism and full-throated endorsement of the possibilities of these wondrous technologies, it seems we also lost sight of a fundamental truth. To quote self-made supervillain, Buddy, from the 2004 Pixar film The Incredibles: “When everyone’s super…no one is.”
The rise in digital technologies has been accompanied by trends that are fueling the decentralization of control across our cultural and political institutions — from the declining power of political parties, to a growing lack of faith in traditional journalistic institutions, to public skepticism towards science and intellectual authority.
The result is a giant power vacuum that’s being filled with noise, flattery, and disinformation.
Even the digital platforms whose entire philosophies are rooted in the promise of decentralization are having to face the reality that the pendulum may have swung too far — away from concentrated power in the hands of a few towards distributed power in the hands of all.
Facebook is struggling with the epidemic of false information and “fake news” disseminated through its worldwide platform, and is actively resisting its new identity as news source rather than distribution platform. Twitter is recognizing that its platform is being used as a mechanism for the spread of hate and is being forced to respond before it loses more users and more revenue.
What’s becoming clear in the aftermath of the 2016 election is that it’s true: “When everyone’s powerful…no one is.” And citizens don’t like feeling this way.
Hence the post-election spike in paid subscriptions to The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal and the positive trend in Washington Post subscriptions over the past year. Hence the increased public attention to the importance of accountability journalism and the need to pay for it.
The idea of bringing back some form of elite gatekeepers to engage in a check on what is real and what is not — what is important and what is not, what is true and what is not — harkens back to a time and a paradigm that many of us have criticized as elitist or patronizing. But where we find ourselves now is a far more dangerous place. Yes, back then, power was concentrated in the hands a few individuals, entities, and institutions who set the public’s agenda and oriented the public’s attention to a handful of key issues. But these individuals, entities, and institutions were themselves professionalized and formally trained. They had a code of ethics and guiding principles. And while scholars lamented the hierarchical nature of the information environment, the reality is that trust in these institutions was high.
When Walter Cronkite said “And that’s the way it is,” people didn’t say: “No, it isn’t.”
With trust and authority came a shared body of knowledge, a shared set of facts. With shared facts came the opportunity for public debate and shared governance.
And while Facebook considers new algorithms or crowdsourcing solutions to help prevent the spread of fake news, what they’ll soon discover is that although contrary to their philosophical orientation to the information environment, Walter Lippmann was right. There is no substitute for experts in a field, parsing information and serving as the arbiters of truth, and reifying our faith in a shared reality, a shared body of facts.
Which is why 2017 will be the year journalism and distribution platforms will embrace the reality that no, not everyone is super.
Dannagal G. Young is an associate professor of communication at the University of Delaware.
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
David Weigel A test for online speech
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach