For months now, I have been telling my students at the University of Southern California that one of their first duties as journalists will be to restore trust with audiences. Americans’ trust in the news media has dropped to a new low, and many of the other principles we teach journalism students will be less effective if they don’t have the basic attention and faith of the public. That focus has taken on new urgency in the wake of the 2016 presidential election, and I’ve been thinking more about concrete steps current and future journalists can take to repair the damaged relationship.
So let’s make 2017 the year of transparency. Show your work by explaining more of the reporting process to your audience. Be authentic by being more honest about what you know and what you don’t. It’s a small part of all things we can do, but it’s something we can do now — and frankly should have been doing all along.
Like many members of the media, I felt like I had the wind knocked out of me by the presidential election. I believed in the conventional wisdom that Hillary Clinton would win the presidency. Her loss in the face of our over-confident predictions did further damage to the media’s relationship with the public that we couldn’t afford.
Prior to the election cycle, there were already a lot of things journalists had done in recent years that erode the trust of audiences: making major changes to stories online without so much as an editor’s note, relying on clickbait in headlines and social media posts, teasing or confusing readers in push alerts. These may not seem like big problems, but fixing these bad habits by treating the audience with respect — human to human — can go a long way.
Something we’ve done a better job of in recent years is telling audiences “what we know and what we don’t” as a breaking news situation unfolds. While the process of producing real-time breaking news is somewhat unique, let’s adapt this approach to more types of reporting. We often try too hard to come up with a definitive-sounding conclusion instead of being honest and transparent both throughout the process and in the final product.
A notable exception to the media’s transparency problem this election cycle was The Washington Post’s David Fahrenthold, who showed his work on Twitter as he was reporting on Donald Trump’s charitable giving. And I was inspired by the approach to election-night calls that BuzzFeed’s Ben Smith outlined ahead of the organization’s live Twitter election broadcast (disclosure: I used to work for BuzzFeed). My favorite line: “We don’t believe that our audience is going to trust a news outlet because they’ve got dramatic music, great graphics, or great hair.”
I’m also encouraged by The New York Times’ approach to reporting in Oakland after the city’s devastating warehouse fire. Instead of just giving readers a sense of what they’ve been up to after much of the reporting has been done, they’re starting by establishing a relationship, a conversation while they’re there. Showing their work.
We’ve lost much of the public. The same old tactics won’t work to win them back. In 2017, try something new, taking inspiration from the examples above. Ask yourself why, in your personal life, you trust people. Is it because they talk down to you? Unlikely. It’s probably because you establish a relationship and are able to have genuine conversations.
The election was a wakeup call. We should capitalize on this moment and not fall back into bad habits. If not 2017, then when? I hope we do it now, because otherwise I fear it will be too late.
Laura E. Davis is assistant professor of professional practice at USC Annenberg.
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Andrew Ramsammy Rise of the rebel journalist
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
David Chavern Fake news gets solved
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
Andy Rossback The year of the user
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Richard J. Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Hillary Frey Forests need to burn to regrow
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
An Xiao Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Olivia Ma The year collaboration beats competition
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism