For those of us in journalism, media, and political communication who’ve spent the last decade touting the democratic possibilities of digital technologies, 2016 has been a tough year.
Critical of the dangers of the consolidation of media ownership, we’ve railed against the powerful, centralized gatekeepers of the past. We’ve scoffed at early-20th-century writings by Lippmann, Bernays, and others and their patronizing way they referred to the masses needing to be instructed, guided, or molded.
We’ve cheered for the citizen empowerment that would accompany the downstream migration of control away from concentrated power-holders into the hands of citizens, consumers, and audiences.
We’ve celebrated the foresight of elected officials who, in the 1980s, understood the democratic potential of digital technologies and made a case for funding their development.
We’ve pointed to Web 2.0 as the ultimate realization of the potential of digital technologies to empower individuals to create, talk back, connect, share, and disseminate original unfiltered content.
But in our optimism and full-throated endorsement of the possibilities of these wondrous technologies, it seems we also lost sight of a fundamental truth. To quote self-made supervillain, Buddy, from the 2004 Pixar film The Incredibles: “When everyone’s super…no one is.”
The rise in digital technologies has been accompanied by trends that are fueling the decentralization of control across our cultural and political institutions — from the declining power of political parties, to a growing lack of faith in traditional journalistic institutions, to public skepticism towards science and intellectual authority.
The result is a giant power vacuum that’s being filled with noise, flattery, and disinformation.
Even the digital platforms whose entire philosophies are rooted in the promise of decentralization are having to face the reality that the pendulum may have swung too far — away from concentrated power in the hands of a few towards distributed power in the hands of all.
Facebook is struggling with the epidemic of false information and “fake news” disseminated through its worldwide platform, and is actively resisting its new identity as news source rather than distribution platform. Twitter is recognizing that its platform is being used as a mechanism for the spread of hate and is being forced to respond before it loses more users and more revenue.
What’s becoming clear in the aftermath of the 2016 election is that it’s true: “When everyone’s powerful…no one is.” And citizens don’t like feeling this way.
Hence the post-election spike in paid subscriptions to The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal and the positive trend in Washington Post subscriptions over the past year. Hence the increased public attention to the importance of accountability journalism and the need to pay for it.
The idea of bringing back some form of elite gatekeepers to engage in a check on what is real and what is not — what is important and what is not, what is true and what is not — harkens back to a time and a paradigm that many of us have criticized as elitist or patronizing. But where we find ourselves now is a far more dangerous place. Yes, back then, power was concentrated in the hands a few individuals, entities, and institutions who set the public’s agenda and oriented the public’s attention to a handful of key issues. But these individuals, entities, and institutions were themselves professionalized and formally trained. They had a code of ethics and guiding principles. And while scholars lamented the hierarchical nature of the information environment, the reality is that trust in these institutions was high.
When Walter Cronkite said “And that’s the way it is,” people didn’t say: “No, it isn’t.”
With trust and authority came a shared body of knowledge, a shared set of facts. With shared facts came the opportunity for public debate and shared governance.
And while Facebook considers new algorithms or crowdsourcing solutions to help prevent the spread of fake news, what they’ll soon discover is that although contrary to their philosophical orientation to the information environment, Walter Lippmann was right. There is no substitute for experts in a field, parsing information and serving as the arbiters of truth, and reifying our faith in a shared reality, a shared body of facts.
Which is why 2017 will be the year journalism and distribution platforms will embrace the reality that no, not everyone is super.
Dannagal G. Young is an associate professor of communication at the University of Delaware.
Joanne Lipman The year of the drone, really
Alexis Lloyd Public trust for private realities
Steve Henn The next revolution is voice
Juan Luis Sánchez Your predictions are our present
Lee Glendinning A call for great editing
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Earn trust by working for (and with) readers
Libby Bawcombe Kids board the podcast train
Jonathan Hunt Measurement companies get with the times
Amy Webb Journalism as a service
Elizabeth Jensen Trust depends on the details
Julia Beizer Building a coherent core identity
Maria Bustillos “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”
Mira Lowe News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”
Sydette Harry Facing journalism’s history
Cory Haik Navigating power in Trump’s America
Dhiya Kuriakose The year of digital detoxing
Alice Antheaume A new test for French media
Michael Oreskes Reversing the erosion of democracy
Mario García Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward
Tanya Cordrey The resurgence of reach
Lam Thuy Vo The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication
Doris Truong Connecting with diverse perspectives
Dannagal G. Young The return of the gatekeepers
Priya Ganapati Mobile websites are ready for reinvention
Adam Thomas The coming collaboration across Europe
Emi Kolawole From empathy to community
Rachel Schallom Stop flying over the flyover states
Mike Ragsdale A smarter information diet
Reyhan Harmanci Bear witness — but then what?
Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel A rebirth of populist journalism
Burt Herman Local news gets interesting
Amie Ferris-Rotman Вслед за Россией
Ariane Bernard Better data about your users
Taylor Lorenz “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing
Robert Hernandez History will exclude you, again
Jeremy Barr A terrible year for Tiers B through D
Ståle Grut The battle for high-quality VR
Kathleen Kingsbury Print as a premium offering
Erin Pettigrew A year of reflection in tech
Peter Sterne A dangerous anti-press mix
Mary Walter-Brown Getting comfortable asking for money
Scott Dodd Nonprofits team up for impact
Liz Danzico The triumph of the small
Andrew Haeg The year of listening
P. Kim Bui The year journalism teaches again
Bill Adair The year of the fact-checking bot
Emily Goligoski Incorporating audience feedback at scale
Ken Schwencke Disaggregation and collection
Nathalie Malinarich Making it easy
Molly de Aguiar Philanthropists galvanize around news
Kawandeep Virdee Moving deeper than the machine of clicks
Andrew Losowsky Building our own communities
Guy Raz Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever
Ole Reißmann Un-faking the news
Javaun Moradi What can we own?
Andy Rossback The year of the user
David Weigel A test for online speech
Eric Nuzum Podcasting stratifies into hard layers
Sue Schardt Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love
Aja Bogdanoff Comments start pulling their weight
Laura Walker Authentic voices, not fake news
Ashley C. Woods Local journalism will fight a new fight
Sarah Marshall Focusing on the why of the click
Liz McMillen The year of deep insights
Geetika Rudra Journalism is community
Jonathan Stray A boom in responsible conservative media
Moreno Cruz Osório The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism
Dan Colarusso Let’s make live video we can love
Richard Tofel The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us
Sara M. Watson There is no neutral interface
Mandy Velez The audience is the source and the story
Asma Khalid The year of the newsy podcast
Michael Kuntz Trust is the new click
Andrea Silenzi Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis
Anita Zielina The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom
Rubina Madan Fillion Snapchat grows up
Margarita Noriega From pinning tweets to tweeting pins
Pablo Boczkowski Fake news and the future of journalism
AX Mina 2017 is for the attention innovators
Jim Friedlich A banner year for venture philanthropy
Tressie McMillan Cottom A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis
Melody Kramer Radically rethinking design
Mathew Ingram The Faustian Facebook dance continues
Claire Wardle Verification takes center stage
Annemarie Dooling UGC as a path out of the bubble
Cindy Royal Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid
Vivian Schiller Tested like never before
Tracie Powell Building reader relationships
Renée Kaplan Pure reach has reached its limit
Jon Slade Trusted news, at a premium
Rachel Sklar Women are going to get loud
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Truthiness in private spaces
Zizi Papacharissi Distracted journalism looks in the mirror
Mary Meehan Feeling blue in a red state
Tim Griggs The year we stop taking sides
Rebekah Monson Journalism is community-as-a-service
Swati Sharma Failing diversity is failing journalism
Alberto Cairo Communicating uncertainty to our readers
Carla Zanoni Prioritizing emotional health
Megan H. Chan Cultural reporting goes mainstream
Matt Waite The people running the media are the problem
Almar Latour Thanks, #fakenews
M. Scott Havens Quality advertising to pair with quality content
David Skok What lies beyond paywalls
Carrie Brown-Smith We won’t do enough
Errin Haines Chaos or community?
Ryan McCarthy Platforms grow up or grow more toxic
Dan Gillmor Fix the demand side of news too
Sarah Wolozin Virtual reality on the open web
Tim Herrera The safe space of service journalism
Bill Keller A healthy skepticism about data
Keren Goldshlager Defining a focus, and then saying no
Corey Ford The year of the rebelpreneur
Caitlin Thompson High touch, high value
Francesco Marconi The year of augmented writing
Umbreen Bhatti A sense of journalists’ humanity
Matt Karolian AI improves publishing
S.P. Sullivan Baking transparency into our routines
Nicholas Quah Podcasting’s coming class war
Millie Tran International expansion without colonial overtones
Gabriel Snyder The aberration of 20th-century journalism
Christopher Meighan Unlocking a deeper mobile experience
Sam Ford The year we talk about our awful metrics
Nushin Rashidian A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions
Helen Havlak Chasing mobile search results
Amy O'Leary Not just covering communities, reaching them
Katie Zhu The year of minority media
Erin Millar The bottom falls out of Canadian media
Ray Soto VR moves from experiments to immersion
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen News after advertising may look like news before advertising
Samantha Barry Messaging apps go mainstream