What lies beyond paywalls

“We can combine machine learning, predictive, and anticipatory analytics to optimize the value exchanged from this reader, on this device, coming from this platform, on this article, at this exact moment in time.”

For over a decade, digital publishers have been wrestling with an existential strategic question: Should we pursue consumer or advertising revenue as our primary revenue stream? In 2017, that question, and the tradeoff it implies, will become obsolete by the widespread adoption of machine-learning, predictive, and anticipatory analytics. In creating a dynamic meter among publishers, their readers, and their advertisers, these algorithms have the potential to transform how the publishing industry generates revenue.

david-skokOne exciting side effect of building a dynamic meter is that it puts the entire organization’s emphasis on each individual story. If the story isn’t of high journalistic or engagement value, then it becomes much harder to build a business model around it. This moves publishers away from the all-or-nothing pursuit of scale at the expense of depth for advertising models, or loyalty at the expense of reach for consumer revenue models. Each article has to stand on its own. This changes dramatically the calculation that reporters and editors make in determining whether to cover a story.

All of it makes the notion of having binary on-or-off paywalls and press releases touting “10 free articles a month” seem antiquated.

Machine learning

Most publishers still identify their articles through the traditional tagging mechanisms of People, Places, and Topics. While these tags are helpful for categorizing the “what” of our journalism, they are unsophisticated tools for categorizing the “why” of our journalism. For example, when we tag a story as People: Donald Trump, Places: Washington, D.C., and Topic: Politics, we now know how we can present that article to our reader — but we don’t know why that story exists.

By mining the text in the article using natural language processing and seeking out complex patterns, machine-learning tools like IBM’s Alchemy API can go deeper in describing the emotional drivers of that story. Perhaps the article is really about a reader feeling outrage, or about feeling like the underdog. So while it may seem at first glance to be another story about the Trump transition team, by applying machine learning to that article, it may reveal that the story has more in common with a sports underdog story about Cleveland’s baseball team.

It’s the Kurt Vonnegut theory of storytelling, that every story follows a consistent emotional pattern — come to life on every article.

Once able to identify the emotional response expressed by a reader on individual articles, publishers can then begin to understand reader patterns and how eliciting specific emotions could create measurable value for each unique visitor.

Predictive analytics

Predictive analytics have the potential to increase revenue for publishers on an article basis while reducing overall cost-per-acquisition. Analytics can also help better convert visitors to subscribers, and most importantly, increase readers’ satisfaction.

Imagine a reader browsing the web on their smartphone while on a train heading into work. They click on a link through Reddit and arrive on your news site where they are served a paywall. Using predictive analytics, we are quite certain that this Reddit mobile reader will not subscribe to your website. In fact, the reader may even post on Reddit just how much she despises your paywall. So, instead of wasting our time trying to get that reader to subscribe, what other kinds of value can you exchange with her that could be of mutual benefit? Perhaps it’s an email newsletter signup form that could begin an inbound marketing relationship? Perhaps it’s a video preroll ad with a high CPM to generate maximum ad revenue? Perhaps it’s a prompt for the reader to “like” you on Facebook so that they can help expand your reach?

By looking at the data provided by past readers, publishers can predict what the ideal value exchange and conversion rate would be for any visitor arriving on any individual article from any referrer, any platform, at any time of day and then serve them a dynamic meter accordingly. Yes, achieving this will require an investment in data analysts, but there are already third-party tools on the market that could reduce the cost of implementation.

Anticipatory analytics

Predictive analytics have one fundamental flaw: They’re only based on historical data. By learning on the fly, anticipatory analytics are able to adapt in real-time to the conditions surrounding an article.

Remember that Reddit reader whose historical data suggests is unlikely to subscribe? Well, what if the article she is clicking on was an exclusive investigation directly related to Reddit itself? What if the article was just beginning to gain traction in the digital platform ecosystem but it wasn’t yet being picked up by other news outlets? Would that Reddit reader be more likely to subscribe then?

Anticipatory analytics allow publishers to make value-exchange decisions in real time on each article. If they wished, this could allow them to wall-off an article for subscribers only for the precise amount of time when it is of greatest value, and then, “open it back up” when the value of an ad impression surpasses the value of potential subscription revenue.

Machine learning + predictive analytics + anticipatory analytics

Now that we understand how machine learning can identify emotional drivers within stories, how predictive analytics can identify the value exchange between publishers and their individual readers, and how anticipatory analytics can adjust the maximum value exchange on the fly, we can begin to envision how combining all three could become the holy grail for publishers.

For advertisers, a publisher can identify that an article eliciting hope generates higher interest from a Facebook visitor than an article eliciting fear. Knowing hope results in greater advertiser satisfaction when their brand is placed next to those stories, publishers can raise the price of placing an advertisement next to that piece of journalism or insert a relevant piece of sponsored content in that article, while the story is being amplified and accelerating in interest.

From a subscription standpoint, a publisher can adjust paywalls according to a visitor’s likelihood of subscribing. For example, if one identifies that articles eliciting anger generate higher interest from a desktop homepage visitor than those eliciting sympathy and that this anger results in a higher subscription conversion rate while the story is amplifying in interest, you could put a hard wall around that article for that unique moment of time.

None of these scenarios are mutually exclusive. We can combine machine learning, predictive, and anticipatory analytics to optimize the value exchanged from this reader, on this device, coming from this platform, on this article, at this exact moment in time. In other words, a dynamic meter.

A prediction caveat

What could prevent this prediction from coming true is not technology, but organizational culture. The technology needed to pursue the dynamic meter already exists. The challenges of implementation are less technical and more cultural, as they would require publishers to collaborate across departments. In order to maximize overall revenues, publishers may have to do so at the expense of revenues in one department’s P&L or another. It also requires a serious investment in analytics, product, and technology at a time when budgets continue to shrink in newsrooms across North America. Finally, it requires publishers unifying around the common goal of putting their readers, and their stories, and not their own self-interest, first.

If collaboration, investment, and philosophy can align, then 2017 may be the year when a sophisticated, data-driven approach to revenue comes to fruition, and a dynamic value exchange among readers, the advertisers, and publishers, can be achieved.

David Skok is associate editor and head of digital editorial strategy at The Toronto Star.

David Skok   What lies beyond paywalls

Lam Thuy Vo   The primary source in the age of mechanical multiplication

Alexis Lloyd   Public trust for private realities

Olivia Ma   The year collaboration beats competition

Amy Webb   Journalism as a service

Tracie Powell   Building reader relationships

Millie Tran   International expansion without colonial overtones

Steve Henn   The next revolution is voice

Hillary Frey   Forests need to burn to regrow

Mark Armstrong   Time to pay up

Carrie Brown-Smith   We won’t do enough

Rubina Madan Fillion   Snapchat grows up

Dan Gillmor   Fix the demand side of news too

Anita Zielina   The sales funnel reaches (and changes) the newsroom

Jeremy Barr   A terrible year for Tiers B through D

Liz McMillen   The year of deep insights

P. Kim Bui   The year journalism teaches again

Vivian Schiller   Tested like never before

Cindy Royal   Preparing the digital educator-scholar hybrid

M. Scott Havens   Quality advertising to pair with quality content

Ole Reißmann   Un-faking the news

Emi Kolawole   From empathy to community

Erin Millar   The bottom falls out of Canadian media

Christopher Meighan   Unlocking a deeper mobile experience

Tanya Cordrey   The resurgence of reach

Michael Kuntz   Trust is the new click

Matt Karolian   AI improves publishing

Peter Sterne   A dangerous anti-press mix

Dan Colarusso   Let’s make live video we can love

Caitlin Thompson   High touch, high value

Sam Ford   The year we talk about our awful metrics

Richard J. Tofel   The country doesn’t trust us — but they do believe us

Juan Luis Sánchez   Your predictions are our present

S.P. Sullivan   Baking transparency into our routines

Ariane Bernard   Better data about your users

David Weigel   A test for online speech

Renée Kaplan   Pure reach has reached its limit

Samantha Barry   Messaging apps go mainstream

Liz Danzico   The triumph of the small

Dannagal G. Young   The return of the gatekeepers

Pablo Boczkowski   Fake news and the future of journalism

Javaun Moradi   What can we own?

Michael Oreskes   Reversing the erosion of democracy

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   News after advertising may look like news before advertising

Felix Salmon   Headlines matter

Robert Hernandez   History will exclude you, again

Jim Friedlich   A banner year for venture philanthropy

Reyhan Harmanci   Bear witness — but then what?

Sara M. Watson   There is no neutral interface

Helen Havlak   Chasing mobile search results

Dhiya Kuriakose   The year of digital detoxing

Swati Sharma   Failing diversity is failing journalism

Jon Slade   Trusted news, at a premium

Mary Walter-Brown   Getting comfortable asking for money

Julia Beizer   Building a coherent core identity

Molly de Aguiar   Philanthropists galvanize around news

Annemarie Dooling   UGC as a path out of the bubble

Lee Glendinning   A call for great editing

Asma Khalid   The year of the newsy podcast

Nushin Rashidian   A rise in high-price, high-value subscriptions

Juliette De Maeyer and Dominique Trudel   A rebirth of populist journalism

Mario Garcia   Virtual reality on mobile leaps forward

Rachel Schallom   Stop flying over the flyover states

Mandy Velez   The audience is the source and the story

Francesco Marconi   The year of augmented writing

Umbreen Bhatti   A sense of journalists’ humanity

Maria Bustillos   “It’s true — I saw it on Facebook”

Megan H. Chan   Cultural reporting goes mainstream

Scott Dodd   Nonprofits team up for impact

Joanne Lipman   The year of the drone, really

Aja Bogdanoff   Comments start pulling their weight

Tim Griggs   The year we stop taking sides

Mathew Ingram   The Faustian Facebook dance continues

Jonathan Hunt   Measurement companies get with the times

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting stratifies into hard layers

Tressie McMillan Cottom   A path through the media’s coming legitimacy crisis

Rebekah Monson   Journalism is community-as-a-service

Kawandeep Virdee   Moving deeper than the machine of clicks

Alberto Cairo   Communicating uncertainty to our readers

Ashley C. Woods   Local journalism will fight a new fight

Mary Meehan   Feeling blue in a red state

Libby Bawcombe   Kids board the podcast train

Andrew Haeg   The year of listening

Tim Herrera   The safe space of service journalism

Zizi Papacharissi   Distracted journalism looks in the mirror

Emily Goligoski   Incorporating audience feedback at scale

Laura E. Davis   Show your work

Almar Latour   Thanks, #fakenews

Corey Ford   The year of the rebelpreneur

Sydette Harry   Facing journalism’s history

Cory Haik   Navigating power in Trump’s America

Erin Pettigrew   A year of reflection in tech

Claire Wardle   Verification takes center stage

Margarita Noriega   From pinning tweets to tweeting pins

Sue Schardt   Objectivity, fairness, balance, and love

Moreno Cruz Osório   The year of transparency in Brazilian journalism

Ken Schwencke   Disaggregation and collection

Andrea Silenzi   Podcasts dive into breaking news analysis

Andy Rossback   The year of the user

Amie Ferris-Rotman   Вслед за Россией

Kathleen Kingsbury   Print as a premium offering

Amy O'Leary   Not just covering communities, reaching them

Geetika Rudra   Journalism is community

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Truthiness in private spaces

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-checking bot

Carla Zanoni   Prioritizing emotional health

Priya Ganapati   Mobile websites are ready for reinvention

Mike Ragsdale   A smarter information diet

Sarah Wolozin   Virtual reality on the open web

Jonathan Stray   A boom in responsible conservative media

Alice Antheaume   A new test for French media

Sarah Marshall   Focusing on the why of the click

Burt Herman   Local news gets interesting

David Chavern   Fake news gets solved

Nicholas Quah   Podcasting’s coming class war

Guy Raz   Inspiration and hope will matter more than ever

Matt Waite   The people running the media are the problem

Bill Keller   A healthy skepticism about data

Adam Thomas   The coming collaboration across Europe

Taylor Lorenz   “Selfie journalism” becomes a thing

Coleen O'Lear   Back to basics

Rachel Sklar   Women are going to get loud

Andrew Ramsammy   Rise of the rebel journalist

Ståle Grut   The battle for high-quality VR

Nathalie Malinarich   Making it easy

Melody Kramer   Radically rethinking design

Ray Soto   VR moves from experiments to immersion

Ryan McCarthy   Platforms grow up or grow more toxic

Andrew Losowsky   Building our own communities

Laura Walker   Authentic voices, not fake news

Mira Lowe   News literacy, bias, and “Hamilton”

Katie Zhu   The year of minority media

Keren Goldshlager   Defining a focus, and then saying no

Doris Truong   Connecting with diverse perspectives

Errin Haines Whack   Chaos or community?

Elizabeth Jensen   Trust depends on the details

An Xiao Mina   2017 is for the attention innovators

Gabriel Snyder   The aberration of 20th-century journalism

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Earn trust by working for (and with) readers

Trushar Barot   API or die