20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Death to bothsidesism

“In day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting ‘both sides’ in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.”

I predict (pray?) that in 2020, the leaders of our national newspapers will see at last how they are assisting in the despoliation of our democracy — and how essential they could be instead in helping us restore it to health.

The New York Times, the exemplar, has shown itself eminently capable of changing in accord with the times. Its pages are filled with the faces and voices of people previously excluded from the sanctum. It adopted the gender-neutral singular pronoun “they” well before most of the nation. Its investigative and enterprise work rises to today’s unprecedented challenges. But in day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting “both sides” in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.

Here’s a recent example: One politician makes an appeal to hold a president accountable. Another responds by telling the first to put aside partisan politics. One statement will stand as historic; the other is nonsense. But the reporter solemnly adds: “But the appeals to rise above the tribalism of the moment from the two veteran lawmakers fell on deaf ears.” The distortions in the name of balance grow more painful as the article continues.

In a five-year-old essay I wish we’d all read right away, Norm Ornstein (a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a conservative of the good old-fashioned kind) wrote of “a larger ingrained journalistic habit that tries mightily to avoid any hint of reporting bias…the reflexive ‘we report both sides of every story,’ even to the point that one side is given equal weight not supported by reality.”

Ornstein continued: “Saying both sides are equally responsible, insisting on equivalence as the mantra of mainstream journalism, leaves the average voter at sea, unable to identify and vote against those perpetrating the problem. The public is left with a deeper disdain for all politics and all politicians, and voters become more receptive to demagogues and those whose main qualification for office is that they have never served, won’t compromise, and see everything in stark black-and-white terms.”

Wikipedia calls it “bothsidesism.” Its Twitter hashtag does lively trade. But the Times (and The Washington Post) have girded their loins against the frequent outcries over their commitment to it.

The damage this journalism is doing is awful enough. But think too of the promise of what could happen if we were freed from this contortion. Along with the courts, the press has the capacity to bring the nation together when norms are changing. The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage is one example. So is press coverage of sexual harassment. (Here’s an interesting piece of research on this topic.)

We’ve already seen the disastrous results of the press’ dedication to the false-balance folly in its early reporting on climate change. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that, however belatedly. But not on politics. In thrall to an ideal disastrously unsuited to the era, political reporting eats away at truth and knowledge every day. It causes people to think there is nothing solid they can believe in, deepens the divides among us and weakens our will to act “against those perpetrating the problem,” as Ornstein put it.

I predict the change will come next year, because the threat to the survival of our democracy will have become so clear as to be undeniable — even to the most bristlingly defensive of our press colleagues. We can only hope it’s not too late. That, I’d be more hesitant to predict.

Geneva Overholser is a former editor of the Des Moines Register and veteran of The New York Times and The Washington Post.

I predict (pray?) that in 2020, the leaders of our national newspapers will see at last how they are assisting in the despoliation of our democracy — and how essential they could be instead in helping us restore it to health.

The New York Times, the exemplar, has shown itself eminently capable of changing in accord with the times. Its pages are filled with the faces and voices of people previously excluded from the sanctum. It adopted the gender-neutral singular pronoun “they” well before most of the nation. Its investigative and enterprise work rises to today’s unprecedented challenges. But in day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting “both sides” in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.

Here’s a recent example: One politician makes an appeal to hold a president accountable. Another responds by telling the first to put aside partisan politics. One statement will stand as historic; the other is nonsense. But the reporter solemnly adds: “But the appeals to rise above the tribalism of the moment from the two veteran lawmakers fell on deaf ears.” The distortions in the name of balance grow more painful as the article continues.

In a five-year-old essay I wish we’d all read right away, Norm Ornstein (a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a conservative of the good old-fashioned kind) wrote of “a larger ingrained journalistic habit that tries mightily to avoid any hint of reporting bias…the reflexive ‘we report both sides of every story,’ even to the point that one side is given equal weight not supported by reality.”

Ornstein continued: “Saying both sides are equally responsible, insisting on equivalence as the mantra of mainstream journalism, leaves the average voter at sea, unable to identify and vote against those perpetrating the problem. The public is left with a deeper disdain for all politics and all politicians, and voters become more receptive to demagogues and those whose main qualification for office is that they have never served, won’t compromise, and see everything in stark black-and-white terms.”

Wikipedia calls it “bothsidesism.” Its Twitter hashtag does lively trade. But the Times (and The Washington Post) have girded their loins against the frequent outcries over their commitment to it.

The damage this journalism is doing is awful enough. But think too of the promise of what could happen if we were freed from this contortion. Along with the courts, the press has the capacity to bring the nation together when norms are changing. The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage is one example. So is press coverage of sexual harassment. (Here’s an interesting piece of research on this topic.)

We’ve already seen the disastrous results of the press’ dedication to the false-balance folly in its early reporting on climate change. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that, however belatedly. But not on politics. In thrall to an ideal disastrously unsuited to the era, political reporting eats away at truth and knowledge every day. It causes people to think there is nothing solid they can believe in, deepens the divides among us and weakens our will to act “against those perpetrating the problem,” as Ornstein put it.

I predict the change will come next year, because the threat to the survival of our democracy will have become so clear as to be undeniable — even to the most bristlingly defensive of our press colleagues. We can only hope it’s not too late. That, I’d be more hesitant to predict.

Geneva Overholser is a former editor of the Des Moines Register and veteran of The New York Times and The Washington Post.

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Richard Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Nikki Usher   All systems down

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Kevin D. Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Juleyka Lantigua   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Millie Tran   Wicked

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

J. Siguru Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Joshua P. Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look