I predict (pray?) that in 2020, the leaders of our national newspapers will see at last how they are assisting in the despoliation of our democracy — and how essential they could be instead in helping us restore it to health.
The New York Times, the exemplar, has shown itself eminently capable of changing in accord with the times. Its pages are filled with the faces and voices of people previously excluded from the sanctum. It adopted the gender-neutral singular pronoun “they” well before most of the nation. Its investigative and enterprise work rises to today’s unprecedented challenges. But in day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting “both sides” in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.
Here’s a recent example: One politician makes an appeal to hold a president accountable. Another responds by telling the first to put aside partisan politics. One statement will stand as historic; the other is nonsense. But the reporter solemnly adds: “But the appeals to rise above the tribalism of the moment from the two veteran lawmakers fell on deaf ears.” The distortions in the name of balance grow more painful as the article continues.
In a five-year-old essay I wish we’d all read right away, Norm Ornstein (a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a conservative of the good old-fashioned kind) wrote of “a larger ingrained journalistic habit that tries mightily to avoid any hint of reporting bias…the reflexive ‘we report both sides of every story,’ even to the point that one side is given equal weight not supported by reality.”
Ornstein continued: “Saying both sides are equally responsible, insisting on equivalence as the mantra of mainstream journalism, leaves the average voter at sea, unable to identify and vote against those perpetrating the problem. The public is left with a deeper disdain for all politics and all politicians, and voters become more receptive to demagogues and those whose main qualification for office is that they have never served, won’t compromise, and see everything in stark black-and-white terms.”
Wikipedia calls it “bothsidesism.” Its Twitter hashtag does lively trade. But the Times (and The Washington Post) have girded their loins against the frequent outcries over their commitment to it.
The damage this journalism is doing is awful enough. But think too of the promise of what could happen if we were freed from this contortion. Along with the courts, the press has the capacity to bring the nation together when norms are changing. The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage is one example. So is press coverage of sexual harassment. (Here’s an interesting piece of research on this topic.)
We’ve already seen the disastrous results of the press’ dedication to the false-balance folly in its early reporting on climate change. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that, however belatedly. But not on politics. In thrall to an ideal disastrously unsuited to the era, political reporting eats away at truth and knowledge every day. It causes people to think there is nothing solid they can believe in, deepens the divides among us and weakens our will to act “against those perpetrating the problem,” as Ornstein put it.
I predict the change will come next year, because the threat to the survival of our democracy will have become so clear as to be undeniable — even to the most bristlingly defensive of our press colleagues. We can only hope it’s not too late. That, I’d be more hesitant to predict.
Geneva Overholser is a former editor of the Des Moines Register and veteran of The New York Times and The Washington Post.
I predict (pray?) that in 2020, the leaders of our national newspapers will see at last how they are assisting in the despoliation of our democracy — and how essential they could be instead in helping us restore it to health.
The New York Times, the exemplar, has shown itself eminently capable of changing in accord with the times. Its pages are filled with the faces and voices of people previously excluded from the sanctum. It adopted the gender-neutral singular pronoun “they” well before most of the nation. Its investigative and enterprise work rises to today’s unprecedented challenges. But in day-to-day political reporting, the Times is hopelessly stuck in the past. Its proud allegiance to presenting “both sides” in a time of political breakdown renders it a handmaiden to the degradation of truth.
Here’s a recent example: One politician makes an appeal to hold a president accountable. Another responds by telling the first to put aside partisan politics. One statement will stand as historic; the other is nonsense. But the reporter solemnly adds: “But the appeals to rise above the tribalism of the moment from the two veteran lawmakers fell on deaf ears.” The distortions in the name of balance grow more painful as the article continues.
In a five-year-old essay I wish we’d all read right away, Norm Ornstein (a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and a conservative of the good old-fashioned kind) wrote of “a larger ingrained journalistic habit that tries mightily to avoid any hint of reporting bias…the reflexive ‘we report both sides of every story,’ even to the point that one side is given equal weight not supported by reality.”
Ornstein continued: “Saying both sides are equally responsible, insisting on equivalence as the mantra of mainstream journalism, leaves the average voter at sea, unable to identify and vote against those perpetrating the problem. The public is left with a deeper disdain for all politics and all politicians, and voters become more receptive to demagogues and those whose main qualification for office is that they have never served, won’t compromise, and see everything in stark black-and-white terms.”
Wikipedia calls it “bothsidesism.” Its Twitter hashtag does lively trade. But the Times (and The Washington Post) have girded their loins against the frequent outcries over their commitment to it.
The damage this journalism is doing is awful enough. But think too of the promise of what could happen if we were freed from this contortion. Along with the courts, the press has the capacity to bring the nation together when norms are changing. The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage is one example. So is press coverage of sexual harassment. (Here’s an interesting piece of research on this topic.)
We’ve already seen the disastrous results of the press’ dedication to the false-balance folly in its early reporting on climate change. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that, however belatedly. But not on politics. In thrall to an ideal disastrously unsuited to the era, political reporting eats away at truth and knowledge every day. It causes people to think there is nothing solid they can believe in, deepens the divides among us and weakens our will to act “against those perpetrating the problem,” as Ornstein put it.
I predict the change will come next year, because the threat to the survival of our democracy will have become so clear as to be undeniable — even to the most bristlingly defensive of our press colleagues. We can only hope it’s not too late. That, I’d be more hesitant to predict.
Geneva Overholser is a former editor of the Des Moines Register and veteran of The New York Times and The Washington Post.
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Mario García Think small (screen)
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades