I have persistent memories from my first few days in my first newsroom. It was impossible for me to assimilate most of my new experiences into my previous understanding of what a workplace was like, or any abstract ideas of what a newsroom was likely to be. The humor was dark. So dark! Everyone was also much nicer than I anticipated, and so patient with my rookie mistakes. It was much quieter than I expected.
I love newsrooms. I love reporting. I fell in love almost instantly despite all the imperfections in our industry and our processes. But there’s one thing I’ve never been able to assimilate, that feels as incomprehensible now as it did in my first days in this work: I was shocked that there was no method to determining what “the news” was.
Every day, this decision seemed as arbitrary as the day before, with no system or order determining what our community needed from us that day. It just seemed to happen.
That isn’t good enough. It’s past time to get a better system — or, at least, a system.
News has lost its meaning for most of us. How do I know? Because when you ask people what they want from their news (we have), they tell you more traffic and more weather. But if you ask people what they see as their biggest challenges and what information they need to meet those challenges, you get something else. You get stories and tips and more importantly a roadmap for how to create something of value.
Few people want more news. But many, it seems, want more from those of us who work in the news.
There isn’t an infinite menu of things we can provide as producers, reporters, editors, photographers, engagement experts, digital and social wizards, fact-checkers, and all the other roles in a newsroom, but we can certainly do more. We can ask people what they want and build from there, as Berkleyside is building their Oakland newsroom. If it’s connection people need, we could offer something like the dialogues Spaceship Media provides. If our community wants a stake in what we’re building, we could create a co-op like Akron’s Devil Strip. If what they want is to participate and contribute, we can use the tools and programs City Bureau has come up with. If they want a more accurate record and a reckoning, we can create ambitious and powerful journalism in the mold of The New York Times’ 1619 Project.
There’s a lot holding us back from our ambitions. Local news is a tough business, because it’s not much of a business and hard-working people are still losing their jobs and closing up shops. Still, one of the things that holds many of us back is that we’re beholden to the news more than we’re beholden to our communities.
None of us can actually see the gulf between the informed and the ignored, between the legit and misinformation, and between the stories that get attention and the situations that deserve sunlight. We can see the consequences of letting that distance grow. We have to jump in there and try something new — and it’s not going to be the news.
Sarah Alvarez is the founder and editor of Outlier Media in Detroit.
I have persistent memories from my first few days in my first newsroom. It was impossible for me to assimilate most of my new experiences into my previous understanding of what a workplace was like, or any abstract ideas of what a newsroom was likely to be. The humor was dark. So dark! Everyone was also much nicer than I anticipated, and so patient with my rookie mistakes. It was much quieter than I expected.
I love newsrooms. I love reporting. I fell in love almost instantly despite all the imperfections in our industry and our processes. But there’s one thing I’ve never been able to assimilate, that feels as incomprehensible now as it did in my first days in this work: I was shocked that there was no method to determining what “the news” was.
Every day, this decision seemed as arbitrary as the day before, with no system or order determining what our community needed from us that day. It just seemed to happen.
That isn’t good enough. It’s past time to get a better system — or, at least, a system.
News has lost its meaning for most of us. How do I know? Because when you ask people what they want from their news (we have), they tell you more traffic and more weather. But if you ask people what they see as their biggest challenges and what information they need to meet those challenges, you get something else. You get stories and tips and more importantly a roadmap for how to create something of value.
Few people want more news. But many, it seems, want more from those of us who work in the news.
There isn’t an infinite menu of things we can provide as producers, reporters, editors, photographers, engagement experts, digital and social wizards, fact-checkers, and all the other roles in a newsroom, but we can certainly do more. We can ask people what they want and build from there, as Berkleyside is building their Oakland newsroom. If it’s connection people need, we could offer something like the dialogues Spaceship Media provides. If our community wants a stake in what we’re building, we could create a co-op like Akron’s Devil Strip. If what they want is to participate and contribute, we can use the tools and programs City Bureau has come up with. If they want a more accurate record and a reckoning, we can create ambitious and powerful journalism in the mold of The New York Times’ 1619 Project.
There’s a lot holding us back from our ambitions. Local news is a tough business, because it’s not much of a business and hard-working people are still losing their jobs and closing up shops. Still, one of the things that holds many of us back is that we’re beholden to the news more than we’re beholden to our communities.
None of us can actually see the gulf between the informed and the ignored, between the legit and misinformation, and between the stories that get attention and the situations that deserve sunlight. We can see the consequences of letting that distance grow. We have to jump in there and try something new — and it’s not going to be the news.
Sarah Alvarez is the founder and editor of Outlier Media in Detroit.
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
AX Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Mario García Think small (screen)
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline