The 2020 presidential election will be the most expensive election ever, and most of the money will be used on political advertising. Industry experts predicted in September that $10 billion would be spent, a 60 percent increase in ad spending from 2016 — and that was before Michael Bloomberg’s entry into the Democratic primary and the record-breaking $57 million he spent in just his first week as a candidate.
Will all that ad spending matter? Yes and no: These advertisements will have effects, but not on voters. The majority of evidence in political science finds that political ads have limited effects that are short-lived. Individual ads may persuade temporarily by informing voters or triggering an emotional response, but the effects are small in the real world and cancel each other out when ads are aired in equal volume.
This massive infusion of political cash into the media will benefit tech companies and cable news networks more than in previous cycles — reinforcing trends in the media industry that are hurting politics in America today and causing more damage than any negative ad.
The major tech companies are receiving more and more campaign cash. For example, including search ads (and despite their “new rules”), Bloomberg bought $4.6 million in advertising from Google in his first week — more than the entire Democratic field combined had to that point.
Federal regulations disadvantage local news stations in today’s environment. The FCC regulates rates of television ads and demands that stations disclose those rates, but no such regulations exist for online advertising. Traditionally, campaigns have focused their limited resources on ads on local broadcast channels in targeted markets in swing states, but local television ownership is consolidating and these ads will benefit ownership groups as well as individual stations. Local newspapers also receive none of this money for print ads (though there is quite a bit of digital advertising on local newspaper websites, at much lower rates).
The shifting of spending to national cable and online platforms will hasten current trends in the media environment, such as the nationalization of political decision-making. Politics, and political news, are gradually becoming a referendum on the president and what’s going on in Washington, as local news struggles to adapt to the changing economics of news and preferences of consumers.
The unbelievable spending we’re already witnessing will make cable news, tech companies, and owners of television stations richer, while benefiting local news less than ever.
Joshua P. Darr is an assistant professor of political communication at Louisiana State University.
The 2020 presidential election will be the most expensive election ever, and most of the money will be used on political advertising. Industry experts predicted in September that $10 billion would be spent, a 60 percent increase in ad spending from 2016 — and that was before Michael Bloomberg’s entry into the Democratic primary and the record-breaking $57 million he spent in just his first week as a candidate.
Will all that ad spending matter? Yes and no: These advertisements will have effects, but not on voters. The majority of evidence in political science finds that political ads have limited effects that are short-lived. Individual ads may persuade temporarily by informing voters or triggering an emotional response, but the effects are small in the real world and cancel each other out when ads are aired in equal volume.
This massive infusion of political cash into the media will benefit tech companies and cable news networks more than in previous cycles — reinforcing trends in the media industry that are hurting politics in America today and causing more damage than any negative ad.
The major tech companies are receiving more and more campaign cash. For example, including search ads (and despite their “new rules”), Bloomberg bought $4.6 million in advertising from Google in his first week — more than the entire Democratic field combined had to that point.
Federal regulations disadvantage local news stations in today’s environment. The FCC regulates rates of television ads and demands that stations disclose those rates, but no such regulations exist for online advertising. Traditionally, campaigns have focused their limited resources on ads on local broadcast channels in targeted markets in swing states, but local television ownership is consolidating and these ads will benefit ownership groups as well as individual stations. Local newspapers also receive none of this money for print ads (though there is quite a bit of digital advertising on local newspaper websites, at much lower rates).
The shifting of spending to national cable and online platforms will hasten current trends in the media environment, such as the nationalization of political decision-making. Politics, and political news, are gradually becoming a referendum on the president and what’s going on in Washington, as local news struggles to adapt to the changing economics of news and preferences of consumers.
The unbelievable spending we’re already witnessing will make cable news, tech companies, and owners of television stations richer, while benefiting local news less than ever.
Joshua P. Darr is an assistant professor of political communication at Louisiana State University.
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
AX Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Mario García Think small (screen)
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters