20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

A fork in the road for conservative media

“While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse.”

Last year, I predicted the impending fragmentation of the conservative mediasphere. Without President Donald Trump as its center of gravity, I reasoned, conservative news and commentary outlets would resort to sub-ideological sorting — with different outlets competing for different sub-groups within the constellation of single-issue and philosophical dispositions that comprise the modern conservative movement.

In the intervening year, my colleagues Anthony Nadler, Magda Konieczna and I have had the opportunity to interview nearly two dozen online conservative newsworkers, as part of a study funded by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. Our findings, forthcoming in early 2020, have raised doubts about my clairvoyance.

As it happens, few conservative news outlets impose strict ideological standards when hiring reporters and editors. While at times an outlet might champion a particular cause or candidate — Breitbart’s paleoconservative push for Trump in 2016, for example, or The Bulwark’s ongoing anti-Trumpism — in general, we found little sub-ideological sorting among conservative newsworkers. That is, most online conservative news outlets employ conservatives of various ideological stripes. Sorting outlets into fusionist, neoconservative, neoliberal, and paleoconservative niches would require considerable shakeups within extant digital conservative newsrooms, which seems unlikely.

While Trump’s removal by impeachment seems similarly unlikely, he still faces an uphill battle in the 2020 election. Even if he manages to thread the Electoral College needle once again, the inevitable end of the Trump era will necessarily impact a conservative mediasphere that has already been fundamentally reshaped by his presidency.

There are two likely trajectories for a post-Trump future of conservative media — a reckoning or a reformation.

A one-term Trump presidency would precipitate a wave of infighting within both the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. If he loses in a landslide, he risks dragging paleoconservative ideals — such as trade protectionism, anti-immigrant sentiments, and white nationalism — back into ignominy (good riddance).

Such an outcome would likely cause tumult among conservative newsworkers. Those who staked their reputations defending Trump will be forced to denounce him or else face the recriminations of fellow conservatives who publicly held their tongues during the height of the Trump personality cult.

A resurgence of anti-Trump conservatism would create new opportunities for Trump apologists (i.e. Breitbart) to again corner the market on paleoconservative commentary and news. But I suspect most conservative outlets will return to their fusionist roots, in search of a viable post-Trump conservative vision.

On the other hand, if Trump wins reelection, or only loses by a small margin, the main beneficiary will be the nascent Nationalist Conservatism movement. As artfully profiled by the Know Your Enemy podcast this summer, nationalist conservatism is an effort to reproduce Trumpism without the cult of personality. Without a clear imperative to denounce Trumpism outright, many conservative news and commentary outlets will face considerable pressure to hew to the tenets of nationalist conservatism — their audiences will be expecting a worldview similar to the one espoused during the Trump years and will have little incentive to consider where or whether Trump led them astray.

While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse. From William F. Buckley’s founding of the National Review through the Tea Party era, conservative media figures were highly attuned to shifts in public opinion — softening their racial appeals and employing dog whistles, for example, when overt white supremacist rhetoric became perceived as unacceptable to the public at large.

Trump’s brash white supremacism has stretched the tensile boundaries of conservative respectability politics to near their breaking point. Only a strong electoral backlash in 2020 can impose respectable boundaries on the conservative mediasphere. Absent that, with a few principled exceptions, I fear conservative media will venture beyond self-regulation for good.

A.J. Bauer is a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU.

Last year, I predicted the impending fragmentation of the conservative mediasphere. Without President Donald Trump as its center of gravity, I reasoned, conservative news and commentary outlets would resort to sub-ideological sorting — with different outlets competing for different sub-groups within the constellation of single-issue and philosophical dispositions that comprise the modern conservative movement.

In the intervening year, my colleagues Anthony Nadler, Magda Konieczna and I have had the opportunity to interview nearly two dozen online conservative newsworkers, as part of a study funded by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. Our findings, forthcoming in early 2020, have raised doubts about my clairvoyance.

As it happens, few conservative news outlets impose strict ideological standards when hiring reporters and editors. While at times an outlet might champion a particular cause or candidate — Breitbart’s paleoconservative push for Trump in 2016, for example, or The Bulwark’s ongoing anti-Trumpism — in general, we found little sub-ideological sorting among conservative newsworkers. That is, most online conservative news outlets employ conservatives of various ideological stripes. Sorting outlets into fusionist, neoconservative, neoliberal, and paleoconservative niches would require considerable shakeups within extant digital conservative newsrooms, which seems unlikely.

While Trump’s removal by impeachment seems similarly unlikely, he still faces an uphill battle in the 2020 election. Even if he manages to thread the Electoral College needle once again, the inevitable end of the Trump era will necessarily impact a conservative mediasphere that has already been fundamentally reshaped by his presidency.

There are two likely trajectories for a post-Trump future of conservative media — a reckoning or a reformation.

A one-term Trump presidency would precipitate a wave of infighting within both the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. If he loses in a landslide, he risks dragging paleoconservative ideals — such as trade protectionism, anti-immigrant sentiments, and white nationalism — back into ignominy (good riddance).

Such an outcome would likely cause tumult among conservative newsworkers. Those who staked their reputations defending Trump will be forced to denounce him or else face the recriminations of fellow conservatives who publicly held their tongues during the height of the Trump personality cult.

A resurgence of anti-Trump conservatism would create new opportunities for Trump apologists (i.e. Breitbart) to again corner the market on paleoconservative commentary and news. But I suspect most conservative outlets will return to their fusionist roots, in search of a viable post-Trump conservative vision.

On the other hand, if Trump wins reelection, or only loses by a small margin, the main beneficiary will be the nascent Nationalist Conservatism movement. As artfully profiled by the Know Your Enemy podcast this summer, nationalist conservatism is an effort to reproduce Trumpism without the cult of personality. Without a clear imperative to denounce Trumpism outright, many conservative news and commentary outlets will face considerable pressure to hew to the tenets of nationalist conservatism — their audiences will be expecting a worldview similar to the one espoused during the Trump years and will have little incentive to consider where or whether Trump led them astray.

While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse. From William F. Buckley’s founding of the National Review through the Tea Party era, conservative media figures were highly attuned to shifts in public opinion — softening their racial appeals and employing dog whistles, for example, when overt white supremacist rhetoric became perceived as unacceptable to the public at large.

Trump’s brash white supremacism has stretched the tensile boundaries of conservative respectability politics to near their breaking point. Only a strong electoral backlash in 2020 can impose respectable boundaries on the conservative mediasphere. Absent that, with a few principled exceptions, I fear conservative media will venture beyond self-regulation for good.

A.J. Bauer is a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU.

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Millie Tran   Wicked

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad