Last year, I predicted the impending fragmentation of the conservative mediasphere. Without President Donald Trump as its center of gravity, I reasoned, conservative news and commentary outlets would resort to sub-ideological sorting — with different outlets competing for different sub-groups within the constellation of single-issue and philosophical dispositions that comprise the modern conservative movement.
In the intervening year, my colleagues Anthony Nadler, Magda Konieczna and I have had the opportunity to interview nearly two dozen online conservative newsworkers, as part of a study funded by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. Our findings, forthcoming in early 2020, have raised doubts about my clairvoyance.
As it happens, few conservative news outlets impose strict ideological standards when hiring reporters and editors. While at times an outlet might champion a particular cause or candidate — Breitbart’s paleoconservative push for Trump in 2016, for example, or The Bulwark’s ongoing anti-Trumpism — in general, we found little sub-ideological sorting among conservative newsworkers. That is, most online conservative news outlets employ conservatives of various ideological stripes. Sorting outlets into fusionist, neoconservative, neoliberal, and paleoconservative niches would require considerable shakeups within extant digital conservative newsrooms, which seems unlikely.
While Trump’s removal by impeachment seems similarly unlikely, he still faces an uphill battle in the 2020 election. Even if he manages to thread the Electoral College needle once again, the inevitable end of the Trump era will necessarily impact a conservative mediasphere that has already been fundamentally reshaped by his presidency.
There are two likely trajectories for a post-Trump future of conservative media — a reckoning or a reformation.
A one-term Trump presidency would precipitate a wave of infighting within both the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. If he loses in a landslide, he risks dragging paleoconservative ideals — such as trade protectionism, anti-immigrant sentiments, and white nationalism — back into ignominy (good riddance).
Such an outcome would likely cause tumult among conservative newsworkers. Those who staked their reputations defending Trump will be forced to denounce him or else face the recriminations of fellow conservatives who publicly held their tongues during the height of the Trump personality cult.
A resurgence of anti-Trump conservatism would create new opportunities for Trump apologists (i.e. Breitbart) to again corner the market on paleoconservative commentary and news. But I suspect most conservative outlets will return to their fusionist roots, in search of a viable post-Trump conservative vision.
On the other hand, if Trump wins reelection, or only loses by a small margin, the main beneficiary will be the nascent Nationalist Conservatism movement. As artfully profiled by the Know Your Enemy podcast this summer, nationalist conservatism is an effort to reproduce Trumpism without the cult of personality. Without a clear imperative to denounce Trumpism outright, many conservative news and commentary outlets will face considerable pressure to hew to the tenets of nationalist conservatism — their audiences will be expecting a worldview similar to the one espoused during the Trump years and will have little incentive to consider where or whether Trump led them astray.
While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse. From William F. Buckley’s founding of the National Review through the Tea Party era, conservative media figures were highly attuned to shifts in public opinion — softening their racial appeals and employing dog whistles, for example, when overt white supremacist rhetoric became perceived as unacceptable to the public at large.
Trump’s brash white supremacism has stretched the tensile boundaries of conservative respectability politics to near their breaking point. Only a strong electoral backlash in 2020 can impose respectable boundaries on the conservative mediasphere. Absent that, with a few principled exceptions, I fear conservative media will venture beyond self-regulation for good.
A.J. Bauer is a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU.
Last year, I predicted the impending fragmentation of the conservative mediasphere. Without President Donald Trump as its center of gravity, I reasoned, conservative news and commentary outlets would resort to sub-ideological sorting — with different outlets competing for different sub-groups within the constellation of single-issue and philosophical dispositions that comprise the modern conservative movement.
In the intervening year, my colleagues Anthony Nadler, Magda Konieczna and I have had the opportunity to interview nearly two dozen online conservative newsworkers, as part of a study funded by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. Our findings, forthcoming in early 2020, have raised doubts about my clairvoyance.
As it happens, few conservative news outlets impose strict ideological standards when hiring reporters and editors. While at times an outlet might champion a particular cause or candidate — Breitbart’s paleoconservative push for Trump in 2016, for example, or The Bulwark’s ongoing anti-Trumpism — in general, we found little sub-ideological sorting among conservative newsworkers. That is, most online conservative news outlets employ conservatives of various ideological stripes. Sorting outlets into fusionist, neoconservative, neoliberal, and paleoconservative niches would require considerable shakeups within extant digital conservative newsrooms, which seems unlikely.
While Trump’s removal by impeachment seems similarly unlikely, he still faces an uphill battle in the 2020 election. Even if he manages to thread the Electoral College needle once again, the inevitable end of the Trump era will necessarily impact a conservative mediasphere that has already been fundamentally reshaped by his presidency.
There are two likely trajectories for a post-Trump future of conservative media — a reckoning or a reformation.
A one-term Trump presidency would precipitate a wave of infighting within both the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. If he loses in a landslide, he risks dragging paleoconservative ideals — such as trade protectionism, anti-immigrant sentiments, and white nationalism — back into ignominy (good riddance).
Such an outcome would likely cause tumult among conservative newsworkers. Those who staked their reputations defending Trump will be forced to denounce him or else face the recriminations of fellow conservatives who publicly held their tongues during the height of the Trump personality cult.
A resurgence of anti-Trump conservatism would create new opportunities for Trump apologists (i.e. Breitbart) to again corner the market on paleoconservative commentary and news. But I suspect most conservative outlets will return to their fusionist roots, in search of a viable post-Trump conservative vision.
On the other hand, if Trump wins reelection, or only loses by a small margin, the main beneficiary will be the nascent Nationalist Conservatism movement. As artfully profiled by the Know Your Enemy podcast this summer, nationalist conservatism is an effort to reproduce Trumpism without the cult of personality. Without a clear imperative to denounce Trumpism outright, many conservative news and commentary outlets will face considerable pressure to hew to the tenets of nationalist conservatism — their audiences will be expecting a worldview similar to the one espoused during the Trump years and will have little incentive to consider where or whether Trump led them astray.
While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse. From William F. Buckley’s founding of the National Review through the Tea Party era, conservative media figures were highly attuned to shifts in public opinion — softening their racial appeals and employing dog whistles, for example, when overt white supremacist rhetoric became perceived as unacceptable to the public at large.
Trump’s brash white supremacism has stretched the tensile boundaries of conservative respectability politics to near their breaking point. Only a strong electoral backlash in 2020 can impose respectable boundaries on the conservative mediasphere. Absent that, with a few principled exceptions, I fear conservative media will venture beyond self-regulation for good.
A.J. Bauer is a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU.
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Mario García Think small (screen)
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles