Last year, I predicted the impending fragmentation of the conservative mediasphere. Without President Donald Trump as its center of gravity, I reasoned, conservative news and commentary outlets would resort to sub-ideological sorting — with different outlets competing for different sub-groups within the constellation of single-issue and philosophical dispositions that comprise the modern conservative movement.
In the intervening year, my colleagues Anthony Nadler, Magda Konieczna and I have had the opportunity to interview nearly two dozen online conservative newsworkers, as part of a study funded by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. Our findings, forthcoming in early 2020, have raised doubts about my clairvoyance.
As it happens, few conservative news outlets impose strict ideological standards when hiring reporters and editors. While at times an outlet might champion a particular cause or candidate — Breitbart’s paleoconservative push for Trump in 2016, for example, or The Bulwark’s ongoing anti-Trumpism — in general, we found little sub-ideological sorting among conservative newsworkers. That is, most online conservative news outlets employ conservatives of various ideological stripes. Sorting outlets into fusionist, neoconservative, neoliberal, and paleoconservative niches would require considerable shakeups within extant digital conservative newsrooms, which seems unlikely.
While Trump’s removal by impeachment seems similarly unlikely, he still faces an uphill battle in the 2020 election. Even if he manages to thread the Electoral College needle once again, the inevitable end of the Trump era will necessarily impact a conservative mediasphere that has already been fundamentally reshaped by his presidency.
There are two likely trajectories for a post-Trump future of conservative media — a reckoning or a reformation.
A one-term Trump presidency would precipitate a wave of infighting within both the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. If he loses in a landslide, he risks dragging paleoconservative ideals — such as trade protectionism, anti-immigrant sentiments, and white nationalism — back into ignominy (good riddance).
Such an outcome would likely cause tumult among conservative newsworkers. Those who staked their reputations defending Trump will be forced to denounce him or else face the recriminations of fellow conservatives who publicly held their tongues during the height of the Trump personality cult.
A resurgence of anti-Trump conservatism would create new opportunities for Trump apologists (i.e. Breitbart) to again corner the market on paleoconservative commentary and news. But I suspect most conservative outlets will return to their fusionist roots, in search of a viable post-Trump conservative vision.
On the other hand, if Trump wins reelection, or only loses by a small margin, the main beneficiary will be the nascent Nationalist Conservatism movement. As artfully profiled by the Know Your Enemy podcast this summer, nationalist conservatism is an effort to reproduce Trumpism without the cult of personality. Without a clear imperative to denounce Trumpism outright, many conservative news and commentary outlets will face considerable pressure to hew to the tenets of nationalist conservatism — their audiences will be expecting a worldview similar to the one espoused during the Trump years and will have little incentive to consider where or whether Trump led them astray.
While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse. From William F. Buckley’s founding of the National Review through the Tea Party era, conservative media figures were highly attuned to shifts in public opinion — softening their racial appeals and employing dog whistles, for example, when overt white supremacist rhetoric became perceived as unacceptable to the public at large.
Trump’s brash white supremacism has stretched the tensile boundaries of conservative respectability politics to near their breaking point. Only a strong electoral backlash in 2020 can impose respectable boundaries on the conservative mediasphere. Absent that, with a few principled exceptions, I fear conservative media will venture beyond self-regulation for good.
A.J. Bauer is a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU.
Last year, I predicted the impending fragmentation of the conservative mediasphere. Without President Donald Trump as its center of gravity, I reasoned, conservative news and commentary outlets would resort to sub-ideological sorting — with different outlets competing for different sub-groups within the constellation of single-issue and philosophical dispositions that comprise the modern conservative movement.
In the intervening year, my colleagues Anthony Nadler, Magda Konieczna and I have had the opportunity to interview nearly two dozen online conservative newsworkers, as part of a study funded by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University. Our findings, forthcoming in early 2020, have raised doubts about my clairvoyance.
As it happens, few conservative news outlets impose strict ideological standards when hiring reporters and editors. While at times an outlet might champion a particular cause or candidate — Breitbart’s paleoconservative push for Trump in 2016, for example, or The Bulwark’s ongoing anti-Trumpism — in general, we found little sub-ideological sorting among conservative newsworkers. That is, most online conservative news outlets employ conservatives of various ideological stripes. Sorting outlets into fusionist, neoconservative, neoliberal, and paleoconservative niches would require considerable shakeups within extant digital conservative newsrooms, which seems unlikely.
While Trump’s removal by impeachment seems similarly unlikely, he still faces an uphill battle in the 2020 election. Even if he manages to thread the Electoral College needle once again, the inevitable end of the Trump era will necessarily impact a conservative mediasphere that has already been fundamentally reshaped by his presidency.
There are two likely trajectories for a post-Trump future of conservative media — a reckoning or a reformation.
A one-term Trump presidency would precipitate a wave of infighting within both the modern conservative movement and the Republican Party. If he loses in a landslide, he risks dragging paleoconservative ideals — such as trade protectionism, anti-immigrant sentiments, and white nationalism — back into ignominy (good riddance).
Such an outcome would likely cause tumult among conservative newsworkers. Those who staked their reputations defending Trump will be forced to denounce him or else face the recriminations of fellow conservatives who publicly held their tongues during the height of the Trump personality cult.
A resurgence of anti-Trump conservatism would create new opportunities for Trump apologists (i.e. Breitbart) to again corner the market on paleoconservative commentary and news. But I suspect most conservative outlets will return to their fusionist roots, in search of a viable post-Trump conservative vision.
On the other hand, if Trump wins reelection, or only loses by a small margin, the main beneficiary will be the nascent Nationalist Conservatism movement. As artfully profiled by the Know Your Enemy podcast this summer, nationalist conservatism is an effort to reproduce Trumpism without the cult of personality. Without a clear imperative to denounce Trumpism outright, many conservative news and commentary outlets will face considerable pressure to hew to the tenets of nationalist conservatism — their audiences will be expecting a worldview similar to the one espoused during the Trump years and will have little incentive to consider where or whether Trump led them astray.
While conservative media often seem to control of the national narrative, the Trump era has reiterated they are, in fact, limited by the perceived boundaries of acceptable public discourse. From William F. Buckley’s founding of the National Review through the Tea Party era, conservative media figures were highly attuned to shifts in public opinion — softening their racial appeals and employing dog whistles, for example, when overt white supremacist rhetoric became perceived as unacceptable to the public at large.
Trump’s brash white supremacism has stretched the tensile boundaries of conservative respectability politics to near their breaking point. Only a strong electoral backlash in 2020 can impose respectable boundaries on the conservative mediasphere. Absent that, with a few principled exceptions, I fear conservative media will venture beyond self-regulation for good.
A.J. Bauer is a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Media, Culture and Communication at NYU.
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Mario García Think small (screen)
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented