20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

“We forget that there was a time where good journalism penetrated ideological bubbles. So why doesn’t it now?”

Public opinion on the question of whether President Trump should be impeached has barely budged over the past few months, and many journalists have cited expanding ideological bubbles as the reason. And they’re not wrong.

But we forget that there was a time where good journalism penetrated ideological bubbles. So why doesn’t it now? Because journalism is stuck in its own bubble. And worse, we don’t seem to want to address the thorny question of how we got there or take much of the blame for it.

So why isn’t our work having more impact on public opinion? I think there are five reasons.

We are not trusted. According to a recent RAND report, 41 percent of those polled said they believed news has become less reliable than in the past, with only 15 percent saying news is more reliable now. Gallup reported in the fall that only 41 percent of Americans said they trusted the media, with that number at 15 percent for Republicans. Yes, Donald Trump’s anti-press rhetoric has surely contributed to that decline. But in 2014, only 27 percent of Republicans said they trusted the press — so the larger issue preceded Trump.

Some journalistic traditions haven’t effectively made the transition to a digitally dominated world. The largest one is the distinction between news and editorial content. No journalist should ever again shake their head and exclaim in explanation, “But that’s the opinion page, not the news page!” I’m not sure that distinction was even as clear in print as we thought, but in a disaggregated digital world, it’s become utterly meaningless. Much of the public believes an opinion column Post that attacks a politician is a sign of the publication’s bias. It doesn’t matter if it’s fair; it’s the reality. But reality can be hard to find from inside the bubble.

We’ve done a poor job of communicating with our audience. This must change as we move into a reader revenue–driven world. While industry chatter about local news is almost always focused on its massive financial struggles, Pew found in March that 71 percent of consumers thought local media was doing well financially. That’s because we stink at showing vulnerability and being honest with consumers that we need their support if we’re going to stay alive. It’s time to stop couching layoffs as smart digital reorganizations, and admit what we know: Local media is in really tough shape.

Social media has pulled the curtain back — and it isn’t pretty. Twitter is its own mini journalism bubble. It’s the most partisan of the social platforms, and also the one where journalists are highly over-represented among the user base. What could go wrong there? As it turns out, quite a lot.

We spend too much time patting ourselves on the back. While I agree that what we do as journalists is important to democracy, one of journalism’s core rules has always been: Show me, don’t tell me. Look at this 2018 study from Arizona State and see how much more highly we rate ourselves than our sources or the public does. We need to do a better job of letting our work speak for itself.

When we decide to let our journalism speak louder than individual journalists, when we decide that many of our traditions need revisiting in this new age, and when we open up to the consumers who are increasingly supporting us, the bond will get tighter and the trust will follow. But the bubble’s gotta burst first. And I wish I felt as if the pop was right around the corner. But I don’t.

Jim Brady is the CEO of Spirited Media.

Public opinion on the question of whether President Trump should be impeached has barely budged over the past few months, and many journalists have cited expanding ideological bubbles as the reason. And they’re not wrong.

But we forget that there was a time where good journalism penetrated ideological bubbles. So why doesn’t it now? Because journalism is stuck in its own bubble. And worse, we don’t seem to want to address the thorny question of how we got there or take much of the blame for it.

So why isn’t our work having more impact on public opinion? I think there are five reasons.

We are not trusted. According to a recent RAND report, 41 percent of those polled said they believed news has become less reliable than in the past, with only 15 percent saying news is more reliable now. Gallup reported in the fall that only 41 percent of Americans said they trusted the media, with that number at 15 percent for Republicans. Yes, Donald Trump’s anti-press rhetoric has surely contributed to that decline. But in 2014, only 27 percent of Republicans said they trusted the press — so the larger issue preceded Trump.

Some journalistic traditions haven’t effectively made the transition to a digitally dominated world. The largest one is the distinction between news and editorial content. No journalist should ever again shake their head and exclaim in explanation, “But that’s the opinion page, not the news page!” I’m not sure that distinction was even as clear in print as we thought, but in a disaggregated digital world, it’s become utterly meaningless. Much of the public believes an opinion column Post that attacks a politician is a sign of the publication’s bias. It doesn’t matter if it’s fair; it’s the reality. But reality can be hard to find from inside the bubble.

We’ve done a poor job of communicating with our audience. This must change as we move into a reader revenue–driven world. While industry chatter about local news is almost always focused on its massive financial struggles, Pew found in March that 71 percent of consumers thought local media was doing well financially. That’s because we stink at showing vulnerability and being honest with consumers that we need their support if we’re going to stay alive. It’s time to stop couching layoffs as smart digital reorganizations, and admit what we know: Local media is in really tough shape.

Social media has pulled the curtain back — and it isn’t pretty. Twitter is its own mini journalism bubble. It’s the most partisan of the social platforms, and also the one where journalists are highly over-represented among the user base. What could go wrong there? As it turns out, quite a lot.

We spend too much time patting ourselves on the back. While I agree that what we do as journalists is important to democracy, one of journalism’s core rules has always been: Show me, don’t tell me. Look at this 2018 study from Arizona State and see how much more highly we rate ourselves than our sources or the public does. We need to do a better job of letting our work speak for itself.

When we decide to let our journalism speak louder than individual journalists, when we decide that many of our traditions need revisiting in this new age, and when we open up to the consumers who are increasingly supporting us, the bond will get tighter and the trust will follow. But the bubble’s gotta burst first. And I wish I felt as if the pop was right around the corner. But I don’t.

Jim Brady is the CEO of Spirited Media.

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Millie Tran   Wicked

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks