20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Clash of Clans: Election Edition

“The overarching stories journalism tells aren’t just descriptive. Like any popular mythology, the reoccurring elements in journalists’ stories help craft the very categories of identity that people use to comprehend themselves and others.”

The 2020 elections will feel momentous for U.S. journalists. Reporting on such a pivotal event calls not just for accurate facts but also for compelling stories that can make those facts meaningful. What overarching narratives will journalists use to frame the heart of the 2020 contest?

For much of the conservative media, the fundamental narrative for 2020 will echo a longstanding motif: pitting Donald Trump, a pugnacious representative of embattled conservatives, up against elite, condescending liberals and leftists. In this story, liberal forces are driven by a contempt for ordinary conservatives and their communities, who they see as so irredeemably flawed that they are unfit to participate in civic life. Critics of conservative media often don’t take this frame seriously, dismissing conservative victimization as only a rhetorical maneuver. But this is a story that resonates on a deeply emotional level for many. Conservative media constantly remind their audiences of liberals and leftists who they say want to shame and humiliate them. Agitating this kind of identity threat can activate a polarizing lens for how they view politics.

Meanwhie, left-of-center news media will be a bit more fractured in their overarching framing. How the protagonist of this story is characterized will depend on the Democratic candidate and her or his campaign. Nonetheless, I think it’s fair to say that much of progressive media will stage 2020 as a battle against reactionary forces. In a country with changing demographics and rising tides of social justice activism, these reactionaries will be depicted as increasingly desperate as they try to protect entrenched hierarchies of power along the lines of race, gender, religion, and other axes.

So what will be the frame deployed by the many journalists who try to eschew an ideological stance? They will also want something dramatic and captivating — but also something that might play with various audiences. A popular and readymade frame will be the battle of “red vs. blue.” But now that we’ve crawled into what some call a post-truth age, with looming constitutional crises, reducing the race to color-soaked electoral maps won’t cut it. The red-state/blue-state trope will likely be intensified and transformed into something grander — something closer to a “clash of political civilizations” narrative. Two political identities will be portrayed as not just holding different policy preferences or values, but tied to fundamentally irreconcilable ways of life — and of understanding reality itself.

That sort of a framing could be harmful. The overarching stories journalism tells aren’t just descriptive. Like any popular mythology, the reoccurring elements in journalists’ stories help craft the very categories of identity that people use to comprehend themselves and others. The red vs. blue tale is compellingly simple, and it makes these two positions appear fixed and natural.

There will also be a growing current of journalism that undercuts this narrative by probing the contingencies that hold these potentially fractious coalitions and political identities together. You could call it the political sociology beat. During and after the 2016 cycle, some journalists intensified their search for new ways of grasping what seemed like a rapidly changing, unpredictable, and unstable political reality. They started to make use of insights from emerging political and social theory — from scholars like Lilliana Mason and Leonie Huddy — to examine diverse social processes that create, maintain, and sometimes transform how people think about their political identity.

In 2020, political sociology reporting will get better. It will be able to tell more complex stories that grapple with challenging puzzles of political identity formation. Unfortunately, as journalism itself divides further into market-segmented niches, this kind of reporting is likely to be found primarily in outlets that target only certain well-educated audiences.

Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College and author of Making the News Popular.

The 2020 elections will feel momentous for U.S. journalists. Reporting on such a pivotal event calls not just for accurate facts but also for compelling stories that can make those facts meaningful. What overarching narratives will journalists use to frame the heart of the 2020 contest?

For much of the conservative media, the fundamental narrative for 2020 will echo a longstanding motif: pitting Donald Trump, a pugnacious representative of embattled conservatives, up against elite, condescending liberals and leftists. In this story, liberal forces are driven by a contempt for ordinary conservatives and their communities, who they see as so irredeemably flawed that they are unfit to participate in civic life. Critics of conservative media often don’t take this frame seriously, dismissing conservative victimization as only a rhetorical maneuver. But this is a story that resonates on a deeply emotional level for many. Conservative media constantly remind their audiences of liberals and leftists who they say want to shame and humiliate them. Agitating this kind of identity threat can activate a polarizing lens for how they view politics.

Meanwhie, left-of-center news media will be a bit more fractured in their overarching framing. How the protagonist of this story is characterized will depend on the Democratic candidate and her or his campaign. Nonetheless, I think it’s fair to say that much of progressive media will stage 2020 as a battle against reactionary forces. In a country with changing demographics and rising tides of social justice activism, these reactionaries will be depicted as increasingly desperate as they try to protect entrenched hierarchies of power along the lines of race, gender, religion, and other axes.

So what will be the frame deployed by the many journalists who try to eschew an ideological stance? They will also want something dramatic and captivating — but also something that might play with various audiences. A popular and readymade frame will be the battle of “red vs. blue.” But now that we’ve crawled into what some call a post-truth age, with looming constitutional crises, reducing the race to color-soaked electoral maps won’t cut it. The red-state/blue-state trope will likely be intensified and transformed into something grander — something closer to a “clash of political civilizations” narrative. Two political identities will be portrayed as not just holding different policy preferences or values, but tied to fundamentally irreconcilable ways of life — and of understanding reality itself.

That sort of a framing could be harmful. The overarching stories journalism tells aren’t just descriptive. Like any popular mythology, the reoccurring elements in journalists’ stories help craft the very categories of identity that people use to comprehend themselves and others. The red vs. blue tale is compellingly simple, and it makes these two positions appear fixed and natural.

There will also be a growing current of journalism that undercuts this narrative by probing the contingencies that hold these potentially fractious coalitions and political identities together. You could call it the political sociology beat. During and after the 2016 cycle, some journalists intensified their search for new ways of grasping what seemed like a rapidly changing, unpredictable, and unstable political reality. They started to make use of insights from emerging political and social theory — from scholars like Lilliana Mason and Leonie Huddy — to examine diverse social processes that create, maintain, and sometimes transform how people think about their political identity.

In 2020, political sociology reporting will get better. It will be able to tell more complex stories that grapple with challenging puzzles of political identity formation. Unfortunately, as journalism itself divides further into market-segmented niches, this kind of reporting is likely to be found primarily in outlets that target only certain well-educated audiences.

Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College and author of Making the News Popular.

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Millie Tran   Wicked

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen