The 2020 elections will feel momentous for U.S. journalists. Reporting on such a pivotal event calls not just for accurate facts but also for compelling stories that can make those facts meaningful. What overarching narratives will journalists use to frame the heart of the 2020 contest?
For much of the conservative media, the fundamental narrative for 2020 will echo a longstanding motif: pitting Donald Trump, a pugnacious representative of embattled conservatives, up against elite, condescending liberals and leftists. In this story, liberal forces are driven by a contempt for ordinary conservatives and their communities, who they see as so irredeemably flawed that they are unfit to participate in civic life. Critics of conservative media often don’t take this frame seriously, dismissing conservative victimization as only a rhetorical maneuver. But this is a story that resonates on a deeply emotional level for many. Conservative media constantly remind their audiences of liberals and leftists who they say want to shame and humiliate them. Agitating this kind of identity threat can activate a polarizing lens for how they view politics.
Meanwhie, left-of-center news media will be a bit more fractured in their overarching framing. How the protagonist of this story is characterized will depend on the Democratic candidate and her or his campaign. Nonetheless, I think it’s fair to say that much of progressive media will stage 2020 as a battle against reactionary forces. In a country with changing demographics and rising tides of social justice activism, these reactionaries will be depicted as increasingly desperate as they try to protect entrenched hierarchies of power along the lines of race, gender, religion, and other axes.
So what will be the frame deployed by the many journalists who try to eschew an ideological stance? They will also want something dramatic and captivating — but also something that might play with various audiences. A popular and readymade frame will be the battle of “red vs. blue.” But now that we’ve crawled into what some call a post-truth age, with looming constitutional crises, reducing the race to color-soaked electoral maps won’t cut it. The red-state/blue-state trope will likely be intensified and transformed into something grander — something closer to a “clash of political civilizations” narrative. Two political identities will be portrayed as not just holding different policy preferences or values, but tied to fundamentally irreconcilable ways of life — and of understanding reality itself.
That sort of a framing could be harmful. The overarching stories journalism tells aren’t just descriptive. Like any popular mythology, the reoccurring elements in journalists’ stories help craft the very categories of identity that people use to comprehend themselves and others. The red vs. blue tale is compellingly simple, and it makes these two positions appear fixed and natural.
There will also be a growing current of journalism that undercuts this narrative by probing the contingencies that hold these potentially fractious coalitions and political identities together. You could call it the political sociology beat. During and after the 2016 cycle, some journalists intensified their search for new ways of grasping what seemed like a rapidly changing, unpredictable, and unstable political reality. They started to make use of insights from emerging political and social theory — from scholars like Lilliana Mason and Leonie Huddy — to examine diverse social processes that create, maintain, and sometimes transform how people think about their political identity.
In 2020, political sociology reporting will get better. It will be able to tell more complex stories that grapple with challenging puzzles of political identity formation. Unfortunately, as journalism itself divides further into market-segmented niches, this kind of reporting is likely to be found primarily in outlets that target only certain well-educated audiences.
Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College and author of Making the News Popular.
The 2020 elections will feel momentous for U.S. journalists. Reporting on such a pivotal event calls not just for accurate facts but also for compelling stories that can make those facts meaningful. What overarching narratives will journalists use to frame the heart of the 2020 contest?
For much of the conservative media, the fundamental narrative for 2020 will echo a longstanding motif: pitting Donald Trump, a pugnacious representative of embattled conservatives, up against elite, condescending liberals and leftists. In this story, liberal forces are driven by a contempt for ordinary conservatives and their communities, who they see as so irredeemably flawed that they are unfit to participate in civic life. Critics of conservative media often don’t take this frame seriously, dismissing conservative victimization as only a rhetorical maneuver. But this is a story that resonates on a deeply emotional level for many. Conservative media constantly remind their audiences of liberals and leftists who they say want to shame and humiliate them. Agitating this kind of identity threat can activate a polarizing lens for how they view politics.
Meanwhie, left-of-center news media will be a bit more fractured in their overarching framing. How the protagonist of this story is characterized will depend on the Democratic candidate and her or his campaign. Nonetheless, I think it’s fair to say that much of progressive media will stage 2020 as a battle against reactionary forces. In a country with changing demographics and rising tides of social justice activism, these reactionaries will be depicted as increasingly desperate as they try to protect entrenched hierarchies of power along the lines of race, gender, religion, and other axes.
So what will be the frame deployed by the many journalists who try to eschew an ideological stance? They will also want something dramatic and captivating — but also something that might play with various audiences. A popular and readymade frame will be the battle of “red vs. blue.” But now that we’ve crawled into what some call a post-truth age, with looming constitutional crises, reducing the race to color-soaked electoral maps won’t cut it. The red-state/blue-state trope will likely be intensified and transformed into something grander — something closer to a “clash of political civilizations” narrative. Two political identities will be portrayed as not just holding different policy preferences or values, but tied to fundamentally irreconcilable ways of life — and of understanding reality itself.
That sort of a framing could be harmful. The overarching stories journalism tells aren’t just descriptive. Like any popular mythology, the reoccurring elements in journalists’ stories help craft the very categories of identity that people use to comprehend themselves and others. The red vs. blue tale is compellingly simple, and it makes these two positions appear fixed and natural.
There will also be a growing current of journalism that undercuts this narrative by probing the contingencies that hold these potentially fractious coalitions and political identities together. You could call it the political sociology beat. During and after the 2016 cycle, some journalists intensified their search for new ways of grasping what seemed like a rapidly changing, unpredictable, and unstable political reality. They started to make use of insights from emerging political and social theory — from scholars like Lilliana Mason and Leonie Huddy — to examine diverse social processes that create, maintain, and sometimes transform how people think about their political identity.
In 2020, political sociology reporting will get better. It will be able to tell more complex stories that grapple with challenging puzzles of political identity formation. Unfortunately, as journalism itself divides further into market-segmented niches, this kind of reporting is likely to be found primarily in outlets that target only certain well-educated audiences.
Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College and author of Making the News Popular.
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Mario García Think small (screen)
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job