20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

“While meters assume that each story’s contribution toward a user’s eventual subscription is in some sense the same, freemium and dynamic models let us think about how each story can best contribute to the business.”

As U.S. publishers have sought to grow their reader revenue, their metered paywalls have tightened considerably — from many allowing 10 or more articles per month several years ago to an average of five today. This change has largely been successful for publishers; a tighter paywall means more readers being asked to pay, and more readers being asked to pay in turn leads to an increased rate of subscriptions.

But we’ve reached the end of that trend. With many meters already at 5 or less, access simply can’t be tightened much more without turning away visitors who are essentially new to our sites and drastically decreasing traffic and ad revenues. Nor would it be wise to tighten access further: Subscription is an act of loyalty, and readers need some way of developing that loyalty and affinity for a publication before they’re likely to pay.

With that in mind, I predict a shift in how U.S. publishers implement their paywalls, with many beginning to operate a freemium-style model (already common in Europe) and others beginning to experiment with dynamic models that ask different readers to pay at different points in their journey. There are already examples: Gannett has experimented with certain content being for subscribers only, Business Insider has launched BI Prime, and even sites like ESPN have gated off certain types of content for subscribers only.

There’s a lot to be excited for in this shift. While meters assume that each story’s contribution toward a user’s eventual subscription is in some sense the same, freemium and dynamic models let us think about how each story can best contribute to the business — bringing in new readers, driving engagement, driving subscriptions, or deepening engagement among subscribers. This opens up new challenges across the board, from editorial to product to data science, and it’ll be a fascinating year as publishers experiment and adapt in order to align their model to their users’ behaviors.

As U.S. publishers have sought to grow their reader revenue, their metered paywalls have tightened considerably — from many allowing 10 or more articles per month several years ago to an average of five today. This change has largely been successful for publishers; a tighter paywall means more readers being asked to pay, and more readers being asked to pay in turn leads to an increased rate of subscriptions.

But we’ve reached the end of that trend. With many meters already at 5 or less, access simply can’t be tightened much more without turning away visitors who are essentially new to our sites and drastically decreasing traffic and ad revenues. Nor would it be wise to tighten access further: Subscription is an act of loyalty, and readers need some way of developing that loyalty and affinity for a publication before they’re likely to pay.

With that in mind, I predict a shift in how U.S. publishers implement their paywalls, with many beginning to operate a freemium-style model (already common in Europe) and others beginning to experiment with dynamic models that ask different readers to pay at different points in their journey. There are already examples: Gannett has experimented with certain content being for subscribers only, Business Insider has launched BI Prime, and even sites like ESPN have gated off certain types of content for subscribers only.

There’s a lot to be excited for in this shift. While meters assume that each story’s contribution toward a user’s eventual subscription is in some sense the same, freemium and dynamic models let us think about how each story can best contribute to the business — bringing in new readers, driving engagement, driving subscriptions, or deepening engagement among subscribers. This opens up new challenges across the board, from editorial to product to data science, and it’ll be a fascinating year as publishers experiment and adapt in order to align their model to their users’ behaviors.

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Nikki Usher   All systems down

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Marie Gilot   This is fine

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Millie Tran   Wicked

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse