20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

“Trust me — every person of color in your newsroom has a story about how a manager questioned either their news judgment, their diction, or whether they could be neutral or objective.”

In 2020, news organizations will stop playing the neutrality vs. objectivity game with journalists of color.

Okay, that’s an aspirational declaration — but we have to start somewhere right? Trust me — every person of color in your newsroom has a story about how a manager questioned either their news judgment, their diction, or whether they could be neutral or objective.

I remember the day an old boss questioned out loud whether I’d be able to objectively cover a story about the shooting of a black man by police. This was 2007, before the killing of Tamir Rice and Philando Castile. Before the latest spat of nationwide dialogues and hand-wringing about the disproportionate killings of black and brown people at the hands of police.

This particular news boss wondered about my capacity for objectivity because I am black, and she held a common and misguided idea that I couldn’t be neutral or objective because my skin makes it impossible to see “all sides.” This is a common refrain, one many journalists of color have heard before — and it’s a deeply flawed idea that erodes our efforts to comprehensively cover the communities we serve.

Reporters can’t be objective if they are neutral. Yes, you read that right: Objectivity is not neutrality. Neutrality tries and fails to correct the real biases and prejudices of the journalist, which is impossible to do.

This flawed way of thinking also assumes that white journalists have a neutral point of view. News as we know it was built on this idea — that cultural norms, ideas, and points of view, which have historically come from white journalists, are neutral. But we can see from history that news coverage can be explicitly biased, centering the white experience, and in many cases blatantly racist. Some news organizations, like National Geographic, have begun to examine how racist ideology has shaped their journalism. It’s an attempt to slowly chip away at this larger idea. But the truth is it’ll take real work to break down the systems that have led to the news coverage we see today.

So, as we enter 2020, it’s important that we do the following:

  1. As newsrooms attempt to diversify, we understand and embrace what a diverse newsroom really means for coverage. It means that your news will look and sound different. This will feel foreign at first. Centering other voices and perspectives takes real work; it’s hard and messy. But it’s necessary. Especially if your organization is serious about diversifying.
  2. You must listen to the people of color in your newsroom. Remember, you hired them because they are smart and capable journalists. Let them do their jobs.
  3. Get rid of the idea of “bothsidesism” — and more importantly, false equivalency. Acknowledging the rights and humanity of people is not a “side.” The cost of being neutral is an ill-informed public that is distrustful of what we do.

Here’s to hoping!

Tonya Mosley is co-host of NPR’s midday news show Here & Now.

In 2020, news organizations will stop playing the neutrality vs. objectivity game with journalists of color.

Okay, that’s an aspirational declaration — but we have to start somewhere right? Trust me — every person of color in your newsroom has a story about how a manager questioned either their news judgment, their diction, or whether they could be neutral or objective.

I remember the day an old boss questioned out loud whether I’d be able to objectively cover a story about the shooting of a black man by police. This was 2007, before the killing of Tamir Rice and Philando Castile. Before the latest spat of nationwide dialogues and hand-wringing about the disproportionate killings of black and brown people at the hands of police.

This particular news boss wondered about my capacity for objectivity because I am black, and she held a common and misguided idea that I couldn’t be neutral or objective because my skin makes it impossible to see “all sides.” This is a common refrain, one many journalists of color have heard before — and it’s a deeply flawed idea that erodes our efforts to comprehensively cover the communities we serve.

Reporters can’t be objective if they are neutral. Yes, you read that right: Objectivity is not neutrality. Neutrality tries and fails to correct the real biases and prejudices of the journalist, which is impossible to do.

This flawed way of thinking also assumes that white journalists have a neutral point of view. News as we know it was built on this idea — that cultural norms, ideas, and points of view, which have historically come from white journalists, are neutral. But we can see from history that news coverage can be explicitly biased, centering the white experience, and in many cases blatantly racist. Some news organizations, like National Geographic, have begun to examine how racist ideology has shaped their journalism. It’s an attempt to slowly chip away at this larger idea. But the truth is it’ll take real work to break down the systems that have led to the news coverage we see today.

So, as we enter 2020, it’s important that we do the following:

  1. As newsrooms attempt to diversify, we understand and embrace what a diverse newsroom really means for coverage. It means that your news will look and sound different. This will feel foreign at first. Centering other voices and perspectives takes real work; it’s hard and messy. But it’s necessary. Especially if your organization is serious about diversifying.
  2. You must listen to the people of color in your newsroom. Remember, you hired them because they are smart and capable journalists. Let them do their jobs.
  3. Get rid of the idea of “bothsidesism” — and more importantly, false equivalency. Acknowledging the rights and humanity of people is not a “side.” The cost of being neutral is an ill-informed public that is distrustful of what we do.

Here’s to hoping!

Tonya Mosley is co-host of NPR’s midday news show Here & Now.

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Millie Tran   Wicked

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech