Newsrooms will expend enormous resources and effort preparing for Election Night on November 3, 2020. New apps will be built; new interactive maps will premiere; rooms filled with analysts will pour over the incoming data. And there will be a collective sigh of relief late in the night (or more realistically, early the next morning) at having made it through another presidential election.
But I predict the real work will have just begun. Reflections back to 2016 will follow; after the 2016 election, one could hardly go to a journalism conference without hearing about the need for more listening and for more efforts to get out of newsrooms to understand diverse communities. I suspect that 2020 will be characterized by new lessons about the consequences of under-covered and under-served communities, as well as about communities that have lost faith in the news media as an institution. These communities will have fractured, some turning to alternative sources of information, including those that primarily cater to people’s political predispositions. Others will have opted out of what is perceived as an agonizingly long campaign season.
In the week following the election, weary newsrooms will trod out the typical post-mortems: Why did one candidate win and others lose? What do the exit polls tell us? What can be learned from a trip to the most blue and the most red counties? What strategic blunders defined the election?
The aftermath of the election will represent an opportunity for the news media. In this period where the legitimacy of the media (and democracy itself) will be questioned, newsrooms can help the public process what has happened. Did candidates win on the basis of better maneuvering and strategy, illegitimate tactics, or interference? Or did more voters find alignment with particular candidates? Providing the best possible data to answer these questions will help people to process the election in ways that either preserve democracy or raise fundamental questions about the electoral process. Assuming the election is considered largely legitimate (knocking on wood), newsrooms can help to heal communities and bring people together despite the inevitable disappointment that will be felt by many.
By humanizing those with different views, as opposed to focusing on winners making celebratory remarks for example, journalists can promote understanding and (re)build connections within communities. That newsrooms will be able to do this critical post-election work is my aspirational prediction.
Talia Stroud is a professor at the University of Texas and director of the Center for Media Engagement.
Newsrooms will expend enormous resources and effort preparing for Election Night on November 3, 2020. New apps will be built; new interactive maps will premiere; rooms filled with analysts will pour over the incoming data. And there will be a collective sigh of relief late in the night (or more realistically, early the next morning) at having made it through another presidential election.
But I predict the real work will have just begun. Reflections back to 2016 will follow; after the 2016 election, one could hardly go to a journalism conference without hearing about the need for more listening and for more efforts to get out of newsrooms to understand diverse communities. I suspect that 2020 will be characterized by new lessons about the consequences of under-covered and under-served communities, as well as about communities that have lost faith in the news media as an institution. These communities will have fractured, some turning to alternative sources of information, including those that primarily cater to people’s political predispositions. Others will have opted out of what is perceived as an agonizingly long campaign season.
In the week following the election, weary newsrooms will trod out the typical post-mortems: Why did one candidate win and others lose? What do the exit polls tell us? What can be learned from a trip to the most blue and the most red counties? What strategic blunders defined the election?
The aftermath of the election will represent an opportunity for the news media. In this period where the legitimacy of the media (and democracy itself) will be questioned, newsrooms can help the public process what has happened. Did candidates win on the basis of better maneuvering and strategy, illegitimate tactics, or interference? Or did more voters find alignment with particular candidates? Providing the best possible data to answer these questions will help people to process the election in ways that either preserve democracy or raise fundamental questions about the electoral process. Assuming the election is considered largely legitimate (knocking on wood), newsrooms can help to heal communities and bring people together despite the inevitable disappointment that will be felt by many.
By humanizing those with different views, as opposed to focusing on winners making celebratory remarks for example, journalists can promote understanding and (re)build connections within communities. That newsrooms will be able to do this critical post-election work is my aspirational prediction.
Talia Stroud is a professor at the University of Texas and director of the Center for Media Engagement.
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Mario García Think small (screen)
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms