20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

News coverage gets geo-fragmented

“Coverage of the 2020 U.S. presidential election will mark the beginning of gerrymandered news coverage.”

Coverage of the 2020 U.S. presidential election will mark the beginning of gerrymandered news coverage, as hyper-personalization and geotargeting are applied at scale in news apps and in mobile push notifications.

Personalization and social filtering have both been widely leveraged to maximize user engagement with digital news. The communication of unique messages to specific audiences has capitalized on various personalization strategies that target individuals within populations based on: the channel or platform; behavioral information, such as click history; social network information; and users’ self-identified preferences. Location-based personalization is also common in targeting specific consumers, yet has only recently emerged in a news context.

The 2018 midterm elections provided a first glimpse of location-based targeting in journalism, with major news apps and aggregators using location data to personalize push notifications. This was most prominent in the Florida gubernatorial race: National news outlets provided not only different push notifications at different times to local and national audiences — they also fragmented the state, with different alerts sent to users in Orlando and Tallahassee, Miami and Fort Myers.

For example, following the primary elections nominating Republican Ron DeSantis and Democrat Andrew Gillum, some locations only received alerts from NBC News about one party’s candidate — no matter the ideology or previous reading behavior of the user:

In Miami: DeSantis wins Florida GOP primary for Governor, will face Democrat Andrew Gillum after upset. (August, 29, 2018, 6:13 AM)

In Orlando and Tallahassee: Andrew Gillum wins Florida Democratic governor primary. (August, 29, 2018, 6:37 AM)

National: Bernie Sanders-backed Democrat Gillum to take on Trump-endorsed Republican DeSantis in Florida gov race, NBC News projects. (August 29, 2018, 5:05 PM)

Local elections can have national interest and implications, making election coverage applicable to multiple audiences based on their location. Push notifications about these stories increasingly frame the same topic in ways that are unique to local and national audiences, often even when they link to the same story. Personalizing to different local audiences could have the measurable outcome of impacting name recognition for candidates in particular districts.

This location-based personalization, however, is distinctly different from historic differences between local and national news coverage. Local affiliates have traditionally provided further details on stories that may impact local audiences, and smaller news outlets have provided more coverage than national organizations for local-specific stories. While the use of geo-location targeted push notifications has parallels to the nested models of local affiliations and national organizations, the human-information interactions and overall implications — particularly relative to how this applies to communications around elections — are very different.

Personalized push notifications are somewhat unique in that, while the majority of them are paired — with frames for local and national audiences, but pointing to the same story — there’s no guarantee that a user ever taps on the alert to read the story. That means the tailored frame might be all that the user sees. As a result, geo-targeted notifications have the potential to manipulate the information environment, even through subtle choices about detail or sentiment, potentially exacerbating social-geographic fragmentation and gerrymandering understanding of elections.

In a 2018 study we conducted, we found that location-based personalization had only recently emerged, with hundreds of examples in a few states related to political news — a very small subset of push notifications overall. In some cases, this personalization was not only harmless but also highly useful and effective. In other cases, however, it had the potential of amplifying problems like filter bubble, manipulation, and loss of readers’ trust.

Given the preview provided by the 2018 midterm elections, we anticipate that location-based information will be used to send alerts with different frames for the same story; at different times, based on relevance; selectively, with different details, based on local relevance; and from local affiliates, using a national platform.

Recent studies have cast doubts on the extent to which filter bubbles generate completely different perceptions through news coverage. But push notifications present unique personalization opportunities, in terms of location and of the controlled capture of behavioral patterns. We believe that, even if some concerns about filter bubbles have been overstated, location-based personalization of push notifications could present a different and more significant challenge in this context — especially given the hyper-partisan geographic divides in the United States.

Madelyn Sanfilippo is a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy. Yafit Lev-Aretz is an assistant professor of law at the Zicklin School of Business of CUNY’s Baruch College.

Coverage of the 2020 U.S. presidential election will mark the beginning of gerrymandered news coverage, as hyper-personalization and geotargeting are applied at scale in news apps and in mobile push notifications.

Personalization and social filtering have both been widely leveraged to maximize user engagement with digital news. The communication of unique messages to specific audiences has capitalized on various personalization strategies that target individuals within populations based on: the channel or platform; behavioral information, such as click history; social network information; and users’ self-identified preferences. Location-based personalization is also common in targeting specific consumers, yet has only recently emerged in a news context.

The 2018 midterm elections provided a first glimpse of location-based targeting in journalism, with major news apps and aggregators using location data to personalize push notifications. This was most prominent in the Florida gubernatorial race: National news outlets provided not only different push notifications at different times to local and national audiences — they also fragmented the state, with different alerts sent to users in Orlando and Tallahassee, Miami and Fort Myers.

For example, following the primary elections nominating Republican Ron DeSantis and Democrat Andrew Gillum, some locations only received alerts from NBC News about one party’s candidate — no matter the ideology or previous reading behavior of the user:

In Miami: DeSantis wins Florida GOP primary for Governor, will face Democrat Andrew Gillum after upset. (August, 29, 2018, 6:13 AM)

In Orlando and Tallahassee: Andrew Gillum wins Florida Democratic governor primary. (August, 29, 2018, 6:37 AM)

National: Bernie Sanders-backed Democrat Gillum to take on Trump-endorsed Republican DeSantis in Florida gov race, NBC News projects. (August 29, 2018, 5:05 PM)

Local elections can have national interest and implications, making election coverage applicable to multiple audiences based on their location. Push notifications about these stories increasingly frame the same topic in ways that are unique to local and national audiences, often even when they link to the same story. Personalizing to different local audiences could have the measurable outcome of impacting name recognition for candidates in particular districts.

This location-based personalization, however, is distinctly different from historic differences between local and national news coverage. Local affiliates have traditionally provided further details on stories that may impact local audiences, and smaller news outlets have provided more coverage than national organizations for local-specific stories. While the use of geo-location targeted push notifications has parallels to the nested models of local affiliations and national organizations, the human-information interactions and overall implications — particularly relative to how this applies to communications around elections — are very different.

Personalized push notifications are somewhat unique in that, while the majority of them are paired — with frames for local and national audiences, but pointing to the same story — there’s no guarantee that a user ever taps on the alert to read the story. That means the tailored frame might be all that the user sees. As a result, geo-targeted notifications have the potential to manipulate the information environment, even through subtle choices about detail or sentiment, potentially exacerbating social-geographic fragmentation and gerrymandering understanding of elections.

In a 2018 study we conducted, we found that location-based personalization had only recently emerged, with hundreds of examples in a few states related to political news — a very small subset of push notifications overall. In some cases, this personalization was not only harmless but also highly useful and effective. In other cases, however, it had the potential of amplifying problems like filter bubble, manipulation, and loss of readers’ trust.

Given the preview provided by the 2018 midterm elections, we anticipate that location-based information will be used to send alerts with different frames for the same story; at different times, based on relevance; selectively, with different details, based on local relevance; and from local affiliates, using a national platform.

Recent studies have cast doubts on the extent to which filter bubbles generate completely different perceptions through news coverage. But push notifications present unique personalization opportunities, in terms of location and of the controlled capture of behavioral patterns. We believe that, even if some concerns about filter bubbles have been overstated, location-based personalization of push notifications could present a different and more significant challenge in this context — especially given the hyper-partisan geographic divides in the United States.

Madelyn Sanfilippo is a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy. Yafit Lev-Aretz is an assistant professor of law at the Zicklin School of Business of CUNY’s Baruch College.

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Millie Tran   Wicked

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions