Why are tech platforms obsessed with audio all of a sudden? Radio’s been around forever.
Here’s some context: In the last few years, improvements in machine learning have powered automatic transcription that’s cheap, quick, and accurate. That makes it possible, with enough computing power, to treat MP3 files like text. Before machine learning, a podcast’s MP3 files were like black boxes in an RSS feed. Now it’s possible for computers to know what an MP3 file is talking about without the use of metatags. That’s huge.
If we can treat MP3 files like text, we can link between them. What might it be like to fall into an audio rabbit hole? What would it look like to have programming that expands and contracts depending on how much time a listener has or where they are in their day? With better personalization, what’s news to me might be slightly different than what’s news to you. You used to have one giant antenna for your entire audience. Now, as a broadcaster, you can have many antennas for many audiences.
In a future where you don’t just have one big audience, but many, having a diverse newsroom is more important than ever. Look around your newsrooms right now: What talent are you overlooking? Who could you start developing right now? I think you could futureproof your newsroom by hiring more people that look like your audience and training them today.
In the radio of the future, the role of editors might change. They’ll still be really important; editors are the ones who decide what’s news. But it used to be that one of their main functions was to choose which stories went into the circular file — the trash can. You only had so much air time. But with dynamic on-demand radio, they won’t have that problem. In this version of the future, I think the best editors won’t be the gatekeepers. They’ll be the champions. The advocates. And they’ll have an incredible tool in their tool belt: data.
With data, we can overcome our personal biases to make better informed editorial decisions. It’s no longer “I like this, I don’t like that.” A savvy editor could learn about their audience and what works for them. We can use data to tell better stories. With second-by-second analytics, we’ll make better choices about our craft. We could A/B test a lede, for example. We can question everything!
Brenda P. Salinas is an audio content strategist at Google.
Why are tech platforms obsessed with audio all of a sudden? Radio’s been around forever.
Here’s some context: In the last few years, improvements in machine learning have powered automatic transcription that’s cheap, quick, and accurate. That makes it possible, with enough computing power, to treat MP3 files like text. Before machine learning, a podcast’s MP3 files were like black boxes in an RSS feed. Now it’s possible for computers to know what an MP3 file is talking about without the use of metatags. That’s huge.
If we can treat MP3 files like text, we can link between them. What might it be like to fall into an audio rabbit hole? What would it look like to have programming that expands and contracts depending on how much time a listener has or where they are in their day? With better personalization, what’s news to me might be slightly different than what’s news to you. You used to have one giant antenna for your entire audience. Now, as a broadcaster, you can have many antennas for many audiences.
In a future where you don’t just have one big audience, but many, having a diverse newsroom is more important than ever. Look around your newsrooms right now: What talent are you overlooking? Who could you start developing right now? I think you could futureproof your newsroom by hiring more people that look like your audience and training them today.
In the radio of the future, the role of editors might change. They’ll still be really important; editors are the ones who decide what’s news. But it used to be that one of their main functions was to choose which stories went into the circular file — the trash can. You only had so much air time. But with dynamic on-demand radio, they won’t have that problem. In this version of the future, I think the best editors won’t be the gatekeepers. They’ll be the champions. The advocates. And they’ll have an incredible tool in their tool belt: data.
With data, we can overcome our personal biases to make better informed editorial decisions. It’s no longer “I like this, I don’t like that.” A savvy editor could learn about their audience and what works for them. We can use data to tell better stories. With second-by-second analytics, we’ll make better choices about our craft. We could A/B test a lede, for example. We can question everything!
Brenda P. Salinas is an audio content strategist at Google.
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates